Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

被引:9
|
作者
Sreenivasan, Jayakumar [1 ]
Reddy, Rohin K. [2 ]
Jamil, Yasser [1 ]
Malik, Aaqib [3 ]
Chamie, Daniel [1 ]
Howard, James P. [2 ]
Nanna, Michael G. [1 ]
Mintz, Gary S. [4 ]
Maehara, Akiko [4 ,5 ]
Ali, Ziad A. [4 ,6 ]
Moses, Jeffrey W. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Chen, Shao-Liang [7 ]
Chieffo, Alaide [8 ,9 ]
Colombo, Antonio [10 ]
Leon, Martin B. [4 ,5 ]
Lansky, Alexandra J. [1 ]
Ahmad, Yousif [1 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Sch Med, Sect Cardiovasc Med, New Haven, CT USA
[2] Imperial Coll London, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London, England
[3] New York Med Coll, Westchester Med Ctr, Dept Cardiol, Valhalla, NY USA
[4] Cardiovasc Res Fdn, New York, NY USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[6] St Francis Hosp, Roslyn, NY USA
[7] Nanjing Med Univ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[8] Univ Vita Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
[9] IRCCS San Raffaele Sci Inst, Milan, Italy
[10] Humanitas IRCCS, Milan, Italy
来源
关键词
intravascular ultrasound; meta-analysis; optical coherence tomography; percutaneous coronary intervention; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; ELUTING STENT IMPLANTATION; ULTRASOUND; GUIDANCE; REVASCULARIZATION; OUTCOMES; LESIONS; MULTICENTER; DESIGN; IVUS;
D O I
10.1161/JAHA.123.031111
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Despite the initial evidence supporting the utility of intravascular imaging to guide percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), adoption remains low. Recent new trial data have become available. An updated study-level meta-analysis comparing intravascular imaging to angiography to guide PCI was performed. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided PCI compared with angiography-guided PCI. Methods and Results: A random-effects meta-analysis was performed on the basis of the intention-to-treat principle. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac events, cardiac death, and all-cause death. Mixed-effects meta-regression was performed to investigate the impact of complex PCI on the primary outcomes. A total of 16 trials with 7814 patients were included. The weighted mean follow-up duration was 28.8 months. Intravascular imaging led to a lower risk of major adverse cardiac events (relative risk [RR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.55-0.82]; P<0.001), cardiac death (RR, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.34-0.71]; P<0.001), stent thrombosis (RR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.40-0.99]; P=0.046), target-lesion revascularization (RR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.49-0.91]; P=0.01), and target-vessel revascularization (RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.45-0.80]; P<0.001). In complex lesion subsets, the point estimate for imaging-guided PCI compared with angiography-guided PCI for all-cause death was a RR of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.55-1.02; P=0.07). Conclusions: In patients undergoing PCI, intravascular imaging is associated with reductions in major adverse cardiac events, cardiac death, stent thrombosis, target-lesion revascularization, and target-vessel revascularization. The magnitude of benefit is large and consistent across all included studies. There may also be benefits in all-cause death, particularly in complex lesion subsets. These results support the use of intravascular imaging as standard of care and updates of clinical guidelines.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
    Sreenivasan, Jayakumar
    Reddy, Rohin
    Jamil, Yasser
    Malik, Aaqib H.
    Chamie, Daniel
    Howard, James
    Nanna, Michael
    Mintz, Gary
    Maehara, Akiko
    Ali, Ziad
    Moses, Jeffrey
    Chen, Shaoliang
    Chieffo, Alaide
    Colombo, Antonio
    Leon, Martin
    Lansky, Alexandra
    Ahmad, Yousif
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 82 (17) : B258 - B258
  • [2] Intravascular Ultrasound Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Darmoch, Fahed
    Alraies, M. Chadi
    Al-Khadra, Yasser
    Pacha, Homam Moussa
    Pinto, Duane S.
    Osborn, Eric A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2020, 9 (05):
  • [3] Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Amin, Ahmed Mazen
    Khlidj, Yehya
    Abuelazm, Mohamed
    Sayed, Ahmed
    Khan, Ubaid
    Elewidi, Mariam Mahmoud
    Tanashat, Mohammad
    Elharti, Hesham
    Ellabban, Mohamed Hatem
    Alassiri, Abdullah K.
    Alsaed, Mohamad
    Abdelazeem, Basel
    Kawsara, Akram
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [4] Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Complex PCI: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hamed, Mohamed
    Mohamed, Sheref
    Mahmoud, Mohamed
    Kahan, Jonathan
    Mohsen, Amr
    Rahman, Faisal
    Kayani, Waleed
    Alfonso, Fernando
    Brilakis, Emmanuel S.
    Elgendy, Islam Y.
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Elbadawi, Ayman
    CARDIOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2024, 13 (02) : 379 - 399
  • [5] Intravascular ultrasound-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and metaregression of randomized controlled trials
    Rahman, Asad
    Ahmed, Mushood
    Nadeem, Zain
    Javaid, Hira
    Jain, Hritvik
    Ahsan, Areeba
    Ahmad, Adeel
    Shahid, Farhan
    Ahmed, Raheel
    CIRCULATION, 2024, 150
  • [6] Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Mohan, Gautham Varun Krishna
    Babar, Nawabzada Nadir
    Sompalli, Sindhuja
    Mian, Muhammad Umar
    Israr, Farhan
    Chaudhari, Sandipkumar S.
    Wei, Calvin R.
    Allahwala, Danish
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (09)
  • [7] Intravascular Imaging-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided PCI: Meta-Analysis of 20 Randomized Controlled Trials
    Hong, David
    Kwon, Woochan
    Lee, Seung Hun
    Kim, Hyun Kuk
    Lee, Kwan Yong
    Choo, Eun Ho
    Hong, Young Joon
    Ahn, Youngkeun
    Jeong, Myung Ho
    Choi, Ki Hong
    Park, Taek Kyu
    Yang, Jeong Hoon
    Song, Young Bin
    Hahn, Joo-Yong
    Choi, Seung-Hyuk
    Gwon, Hyeon-Cheol
    Shin, Doosup
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2023, 82 (17) : B13 - B13
  • [8] Intravascular imaging guided versus coronary angiography guided percutaneous coronary intervention: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Khan, Safi U.
    Agarwal, Siddharth
    Arshad, Hassaan B.
    Akbar, Usman Ali
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    Arora, Shilpkumar
    Baber, Usman
    Goel, Sachin S.
    Kleiman, Neal S.
    Shah, Alpesh R.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 383
  • [9] Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression of Randomized Control Trials
    Ahmed, Mushood
    Nadeem, Zain Ali
    Ahsan, Areeba
    Javaid, Hira
    Jain, Hritvik
    Shahid, Farhan
    Ahmed, Raheel
    Mamas, Mamas A.
    CATHETERIZATION AND CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2025, 105 (01) : 68 - 80
  • [10] Impact of Intravascular Imaging- Guided versus Coronary Angiography-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Adverse Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials
    Yasmin, Farah
    Jawed, Kinza
    Moeed, Abdul
    Hassan, Omer
    Rahman, Saad Ur U.
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148