Seismicity zoning at Coso geothermal field and stress changes from fluid production and migration

被引:0
|
作者
Tung, Sui [1 ]
Kaven, Ole [2 ]
Shirzaei, Manoochehr [3 ]
Masterlark, Timothy [4 ]
Wang, Herbert F. [5 ]
Huang, Wei-Chuang [6 ]
Feigl, Kurt L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] US Geol Survey, Catonsville, MD USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA USA
[4] South Dakota Sch Mines, Rapid City, SD USA
[5] Univ Wisconsin, Madison, WI USA
[6] US Navy Geothermal Program Off, Washington, DC USA
关键词
Induced seismicity; Geothermal; Poroelastic; Stress triggering; Finite element; Reduced seismicity; EARTHQUAKE; CALIFORNIA; DEFORMATION; OKLAHOMA; COUNTY; RANGE; RATES; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.epsl.2024.119000
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The Coso geothermal field is a major geothermal power production site in the western United States. It has been observed that low-magnitude seismic events (M < 3.71) are unevenly distributed in three distinct zones, namely, nearfield (<3 km), midfield (3-6 km), and farfield (> 6 km) from the Coso geothermal plant. These zones exhibit distinct changes in earthquake location before and during geothermal production episodes that began in 1986. After 1986, the midfield region of the main flank experiences a significantly lower seismicity rate than the surrounding areas before production episodes. During 2014-2019, the farfield earthquakes cluster in the eastern and western parts of the greater Coso area, which is discernably different from how those pre-production earthquake events were distributed along the conjugate NW-SE and SW-NW trending structures across the main flank. Here, we analyze the stage of stress with finite-element-based poroelastic simulations to illustrate how the spatiotemporal evolution of the seismicity is associated with the pattern of stress perturbations caused by fluid migration amid the operations of geothermal power plants. Generally, similar to 70% of co-production seismicity is found in zones of increased Coulomb stress between 2014 and 2019 at >99% confidence. Meanwhile, the midfield zone of seismic paucity overlaps with the zone of decreasing pore-fluid pressure. Overall, the results provide a physical explanation of how decadal geothermal operations at Coso have perturbed stress-field changes and contributed to the evolving characteristic seismic pattern, shedding insights into assessing the seismic hazard in other geothermal settings.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Tidal modulation of seismicity at the Coso geothermal field
    Wang, Wei
    Shearer, Peter M.
    Vidale, John E.
    Xu, Xiaohua
    Trugman, Daniel T.
    Fialko, Yuri
    EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS, 2022, 579
  • [2] Seismicity and seismic stress in the Coso Range, Coso geothermal field, and Indian Wells Valley region, southeast-central California
    Bhattacharyya, Joydeep
    Lees, Jonathan M.
    Memoir of the Geological Society of America, 2002, 195 : 243 - 257
  • [3] Microseismicity, stress, and fracture in the Coso geothermal field, California
    Feng, Q
    Lees, JM
    TECTONOPHYSICS, 1998, 289 (1-3) : 221 - 238
  • [4] Seismicity Rate Change at the Coso Geothermal Field Following the July 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquakes
    Kaven, J. Ole
    BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2020, 110 (04) : 1728 - 1735
  • [5] Depth migration of seasonally induced seismicity at The Geysers geothermal field
    Johnson, Christopher W.
    Totten, Eoghan J.
    Burgmann, Roland
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (12) : 6196 - 6204
  • [6] A comparison of long-term changes in seismicity at The Geysers, Salton Sea, and Coso geothermal fields
    Trugman, Daniel T.
    Shearer, Peter M.
    Borsa, Adrian A.
    Fialko, Yuri
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 2016, 121 (01) : 225 - 247
  • [7] Scattering from a fault interface in the Coso geothermal field
    Lees, JM
    JOURNAL OF VOLCANOLOGY AND GEOTHERMAL RESEARCH, 2004, 130 (1-2) : 61 - 75
  • [8] Induced seismicity and geothermal energy production in the Salton Sea Geothermal Field, California
    White, Malcolm C. A.
    Nakata, Nori
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [9] P wave anisotropy, stress, and crack distribution at Coso geothermal field, California
    Lees, JM
    Wu, HT
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH, 1999, 104 (B8) : 17955 - 17973
  • [10] Stress tensor changes related to fluid injection at The Geysers geothermal field, California
    Martinez-Garzon, Patricia
    Bohnhoff, Marco
    Kwiatek, Grzegorz
    Dresen, Georg
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 40 (11) : 2596 - 2601