Clinical Outcomes of Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Ceftolozane-Tazobactam in Managing Pseudomonal Infections in Patients Undergoing Renal Replacement Therapy

被引:0
|
作者
El Nekidy, Wasim S. [1 ,2 ]
Al Ali, Mooza [1 ]
Abidi, Emna [1 ]
El Lababidi, Rania [1 ]
Alrahmany, Diaa [3 ]
Ghazi, Islam M. [4 ]
Mooty, Mohamad [1 ]
Hijazi, Fadi [1 ]
Ghosn, Muriel [1 ]
Mallat, Jihad [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Abu Dhabi, POB 112412, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Cleveland Clin, Lerner Coll Med, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[3] Minist Hlth, Pharmaceut Care Dept, Directorate Gen Med Supplies, Muscat 393100, Oman
[4] Long Isl Univ, Arnold & Marie Schwartz Coll Pharm, Brooklyn, NY 11201 USA
来源
ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL | 2024年 / 13卷 / 08期
关键词
ceftazidime-avibactam; ceftolozane-tazobactam; dialysis; outcomes;
D O I
10.3390/antibiotics13080699
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The optimal doses of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T) for treating multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) in patients utilizing renal replacement therapy (RRT) are not well established. Hence, the objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with the suggested doses of CZA and C/T in patients with PSA infection utilizing RRT. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted at our hospital between September 2018 and March 2022. Clinical cure was the primary endpoint, while microbiologic cure, 30-day recurrence, and 30-day mortality were the secondary endpoints. Results: In total, 45 subjects met the inclusion criteria, with 25 receiving CZA and 20 receiving C/T. The median age was 69 (52-81) and 69 (61.5-83) years, respectively, while the median weight was 70 (55.5-81.5) and 66 (57-79) kg, respectively. Clinical cure was achieved in 12 (48%) subjects in the CZA group and 12 (60%) in the C/T group (p = 0.432). Of the 36 subjects who had repeated cultures, a microbiologic cure was achieved in 14/23 (60%) subjects and 10/13 (76.9%) subjects (p = 0.273). Thirty-day recurrence was reported in 3 (12%) cases in the CZA group and 6 (30%) in the C/T group (p = 0.082). The 30-day mortality was 13 (52%) subjects in the CZA group and 10 (50%) in the C/T group (p = 0.894). The median maintenance dose of CZA was 1.88 (0.94-3.75) g and 2.25 (1.5-2.25) g for C/T. Multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that both drugs did not differ significantly in clinical cure. Bloodstream infection (BSI) (OR = 25, 95% CI: 1.63-411.7, p = 0.021) was the only independent factor associated with clinical cure in this population. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that C/T and CZA did not significantly differ in achieving clinical cure in patients with MDR PSA infections undergoing RRT. Larger clinical trials are needed to confirm our findings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Clinical outcomes and emergence of resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections treated with ceftolozane-tazobactam versus ceftazidime-avibactam
    Hareza, Dariusz A.
    Cosgrove, Sara E.
    Bonomo, Robert A.
    Dzintars, Kathryn
    Karaba, Sara M.
    Hawes, Armani M.
    Tekle, Tsigereda
    Simner, Patricia J.
    Tamma, Pranita D.
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2024, 68 (10)
  • [2] Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Ceftolozane-Tazobactam After Lung Transplantation
    Amore, Davide
    Pecoraro, Ylenia
    Carillo, Carolina
    Russo, Gianluca
    Poggi, Camilla
    Anile, Marco
    Pagini, Andreina
    Bassi, Massimiliano
    Cagnetti, Sara
    Mottola, Emilia
    D'Agostino, Federica Gilda
    Vannucci, Jacopo
    Mantovani, Sara
    Pugliese, Francesco
    De Giacomo, Tiziano
    Rendina, Erino Angelo
    Venuta, Federico
    Diso, Daniele
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 52 (05) : 1605 - 1607
  • [3] Meta-analysis of Outcomes Using Ceftolozane-Tazobactam and Ceftazidime-Avibactam for Multidrug-Resistant Organism Infections
    Wilson, Geneva
    Fitzpatrick, Margaret
    Walding, Kyle
    Gonzalez, Beverly
    Evans, Charlesnika
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2020, 41 : S316 - S316
  • [4] Clinical outcomes of ceftolozane-tazobactam dosing in patients with sepsis undergoing renal replacement therapies
    El Nekidy, Wasim S.
    Al Ali, Mooza
    Abidi, Emna
    Ghazi, Islam M.
    Attallah, Nizar
    El Lababidi, Rania
    Hijazi, Fadi
    Mallat, Jihad
    CLINICAL NEPHROLOGY, 2023, 100 (03) : 126 - 131
  • [5] Monotherapy of ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam against multidrug-resistant organisms
    Alatoom, Adnan
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 62 : 126 - 126
  • [6] CLINICAL AND PHARMACOECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF CEFTOLOZANE- TAZOBACTAM AND CEFTAZIDIME-AVIBACTAM
    Beatty, Julia
    Liao, Siyun
    Droege, Chris
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 48
  • [7] Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a Multicenter Cohort Study
    Almangour, Thamer A.
    Ghonem, Leen
    Alassiri, Dareen
    Aljurbua, Alanoud
    Al Musawa, Mohammed
    Alharbi, Aminah
    Almohaizeie, Abdullah
    Almuhisen, Sara
    Alghaith, Jeelan
    Damfu, Nader
    Aljefri, Doaa
    Alfahad, Wafa
    Khormi, Yaqoub
    Alanazi, Menyfah Q.
    Alsowaida, Yazed Saleh
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2023, 67 (08)
  • [8] Newer Intravenous Antibiotics in the Intensive Care Unit: Ceftaroline, Ceftolozane-Tazobactam, and Ceftazidime-Avibactam
    Connor, Kathryn A.
    AACN ADVANCED CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 27 (04) : 353 - 357
  • [9] Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Simulations of Cost-Effective Dosage Regimens of Ceftolozane-Tazobactam and Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Patients with Renal Impairment
    Dheyriat, Lucile
    Bourguignon, Laurent
    Perpoint, Thomas
    Ferry, Tristan
    Goutelle, Sylvain
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2022, 66 (03)
  • [10] Ceftazidime-avibactam and ceftolozane-tazobactam susceptibility of multidrug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains in Hungary
    O'Neall, Dustin
    Juhasz, Emese
    Toth, Akos
    Urban, Edit
    Szabo, Judit
    Melegh, Szilvia
    Katona, Katalin
    Kristof, Katalin
    ACTA MICROBIOLOGICA ET IMMUNOLOGICA HUNGARICA, 2020, 67 (01) : 61 - 65