Comparison of Skin Effects in Ferromagnetic and Nonferromagnetic Metals in Eddy Current Testing

被引:0
|
作者
Kang, Jiale [1 ]
Zeng, Zhiwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Sch Aerosp Engn, Room 321,Aerosp Bldg,Xiangan Campus, Xiamen 361005, Fujian, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Ferromagnetic metal; eddy current testing; skin effect; skin depth; PENETRATION;
D O I
10.1080/09349847.2024.2395513
中图分类号
TB3 [工程材料学];
学科分类号
0805 ; 080502 ;
摘要
In eddy current (EC) testing, skin effect is a constraint factor of detecting subsurface defects and skin depth is an important parameter for probe design and frequency setup. This paper compares the skin effects in ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic metals. It is well known that the high permeability of ferromagnetic metal makes the attenuation of EC faster due to the greater EC loss. In this paper, the other role of the high permeability of ferromagnetic metal on the skin effect is reported. The EC distributions in both the radial and depth directions in the two types of materials excited by pancake coils are computed. It shows that the EC is more dispersed in the radial direction in high-permeability material. More importantly, the high permeability of ferromagnetic metal makes the skin depth of EC under the excitation of pancake coil close to the standard skin depth of EC under the excitation of uniform magnetic field, whereas there is a big discrepancy in the skin depths of ECs under the two types of excitations. This difference is explained by the radial dispersion of EC based on the EC diffusion-cancellation theory. Finally, the EC distributions in ferromagnetic Q235 steel and nonferromagnetic brass are compared, and the simulation results are qualitatively verified by experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 282
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Integrated Eddy Current Testing and Magnetic Memory Method Testing for Ferromagnetic Metals
    Lin, Junming
    Zhou, Changzhi
    Shen, Jianzhong
    APPLIED ELECTROMAGNETICS AND MECHANICS (II), 2009, 13 : 413 - +
  • [2] Investigation of Pulsed Eddy Current Testing of Flaws in Ferromagnetic and Non-ferromagnetic Metals
    Zhou, Deqiang
    Wu, Jialong
    Li, Yong
    Wang, Jun
    You, Lihua
    Zhang, Hong
    An, Wei
    ELECTROMAGNETIC NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION (XVIII), 2015, 40 : 236 - 243
  • [3] Comparison of Inspecting Non-Ferromagnetic and Ferromagnetic Metals Using Velocity Induced Eddy Current Probe
    Feng, Bo
    Ribeiro, Artur L.
    Rocha, Tiago J.
    Ramos, Helena G.
    SENSORS, 2018, 18 (10)
  • [4] Modelling eddy current testing of ferromagnetic medium
    Zorni, Chiara
    Reboud, Christophe
    Decitre, Jean-Marc
    Santandrea, Laurent
    Le Bihan, Yann
    Ventre, Salvatore
    Tamburrino, Antonello
    Lambert, Marc
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED ELECTROMAGNETICS AND MECHANICS, 2012, 39 (1-4) : 245 - 250
  • [5] EDDY CURRENT TESTING OF METALS.
    Blitz, Jack
    Materials and Design, 1987, 8 (06): : 340 - 345
  • [6] THE APPLICATION OF MULTIFREQUENCY EDDY CURRENTS TO TESTING FERROMAGNETIC METALS
    BLITZ, J
    PEAT, TS
    NDT INTERNATIONAL, 1981, 14 (01): : 15 - 17
  • [7] Transient eddy current response to pulsed eddy current testing inside a ferromagnetic casing
    Sun, Hu
    Shi, Yibing
    Zhang, Wei
    Li, Yanjun
    NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 126
  • [8] FEM Technique for Modeling Eddy-Current Testing of Ferromagnetic Media With Small Skin Depth
    Zaidi, Houda
    Santandrea, Laurent
    Krebs, Guillaume
    Le Bihan, Yann
    Demaldent, Edouard
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2014, 50 (02) : 129 - 132
  • [9] Pulsed eddy current nondestructive testing of ferromagnetic tubes
    Vasic, D
    Bilas, V
    Ambrus, D
    IMTC/O3: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH IEEE INSTRUMENTATION AND MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2003, : 1120 - 1125
  • [10] Massively multiplexed eddy current testing and its comparison with pulsed eddy current testing
    Brown, DJ
    Hils, CM
    Johnson, MJ
    REVIEW OF PROGRESS IN QUANTITATIVE NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION, VOLS 23A AND 23B, 2004, 23 : 390 - 397