Comparison and Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 2 and Version 3 among South Indian Population

被引:3
|
作者
Jayakumar, T. [1 ,2 ]
Rajasudhakar, R. [1 ]
Benoy, Jesnu Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Mysore, All India Inst Speech & Hearing, Dept Speech Language Sci, Speech Sci, Mysuru, Karnataka, India
[2] Univ Mysore, All India Inst Speech & Hearing, Dept Speech Language Sci, Mysuru 570006, Karnataka, India
关键词
AVQI-Acoustic; Acoustic Evaluation of Voice; Auditory-Perceptual Judgement; Voice Quality; Multi-parametric voice evaluation; DYSPHONIA SEVERITY INDEX; PERCEPTUAL EVALUATION; SPEECH;
D O I
10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.02.019
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Background. Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) has emerged in the recent past as a robust multiparametric voice quality evaluation tool. Two versions of AVQI derived using the program PRAAT have found extensive clinical and research applications. These versions have been validated in several languages around the world. However, no research reports are available on validation of AVQI in the South Indian population. Further, studies comparing the performance of the two versions of AVQI are limited in the literature. Objectives. This study was designed to validate and compare the two versions of AVQI (AVQIv02.02 and AVQIv03.01) in South Indian languages (Malayalam and Kannada). Methods. A retrospective analysis of previously recorded voice samples was carried out on a total of 160 (91 normophonic and 69 dysphonic) voice samples. These samples were perceptually rated on a GRBAS scale by five experienced speech-language pathologists. Standardized Syllable Number (SSN) necessary to derive AVQIv03.01 was computed. Following this, these samples were analyzed to obtain the AVQIv02.02 and AVQIv03.01. The concurrent validity and diagnostic accuracy of these measures were then examined and compared. Results. A moderate agreement was obtained across the judges on perceptual evaluation of voice quality. SSN in Malayalam and Kannada languages were identified to be 29 and 25 syllables respectively. Language differences were not observed on both versions of AVQI. The concurrent validity of AVQIv03.01 (r r = 0.788) was superior to that of AVQIv02.02 (r r = 0.655). Further, the threshold of differentiating normophonic and dysphonic samples were determined to be >3.45 for AVQIv02.02 and >2.45 for AVQIv03.01. Conclusions. AVQIv03.01 is superior to AVQIv02.02 in terms of its diagnostic accuracy and concurrent validity. Current findings also extend the application of AVQI as a robust tool for the evaluation of voice characteristics to the South Indian population.
引用
收藏
页码:1248e1 / 1248e9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population
    Kim, Geun-Hyo
    von Latoszek, Ben Barsties
    Lee, Yeon-Woo
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2021, 35 (04) : 660.e9 - 660.e18
  • [2] Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French
    Pommee, Timothy
    Maryn, Youri
    Finck, Camille
    Morsomme, Dominique
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2020, 34 (04) : 646.e11 - 646.e26
  • [3] Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German
    Latoszek, Ben Barsties, V
    Lehnert, Bernhard
    Janotte, Ben
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2020, 34 (01) : 157.e17 - 157.e25
  • [4] Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI) Version 03.01 in Italian
    Fantini, Marco
    Maccarini, Andrea Ricci
    Firino, Arianna
    Gallia, Michela
    Carlino, Vittoria
    Gorris, Christel
    Bisetti, Massimo Spadola
    Crosetti, Erika
    Succo, Giovanni
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2023, 37 (04) : 631e1 - 631e6
  • [5] Internal Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index version 03.01 und Acoustic Breathiness Index
    von Latoszek, Ben Barsties
    Lehnert, Bernhard
    LARYNGO-RHINO-OTOLOGIE, 2018, 97 (09) : 630 - 635
  • [6] Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and the Acoustic Breathiness Index in the Spanish language
    Delgado Hernandez, Jonathan
    Leon Gomez, Nieves M.
    Jimenez, Alejandra
    Izquierdo, Laura M.
    vander Latoszek, Ben Barsties
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 127 (05): : 317 - 326
  • [7] External Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 With Extended Representativity
    Barsties, Ben
    Maryn, Youri
    ANNALS OF OTOLOGY RHINOLOGY AND LARYNGOLOGY, 2016, 125 (07): : 571 - 583
  • [8] Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, to the Brazilian Portuguese Language
    Englert, Marina
    Latoszek, Ben Barsties, V
    Maryn, Youri
    Behlau, Mara
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2021, 35 (01) : 160.e15 - 160.e21
  • [9] The Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 for the Japanese-speaking Population
    Hosokawa, Kiyohito
    v Latoszek, Ben Barsties
    Iwahashi, Ttoshihiko
    Iwahashi, Mio
    Iwaki, Shinobu
    Kato, Chieri
    Yoshida, Misao
    Sasai, Hisanori
    Miyauchi, Akira
    Matsushiro, Naoki
    Inohara, Hidenori
    Ogawa, Makoto
    Maryn, Youri
    JOURNAL OF VOICE, 2019, 33 (01) : 125.e1 - 125.e12
  • [10] The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population
    Kankare, Elina
    Latoszek, Ben Barsties, V
    Maryn, Youri
    Asikainen, Marja
    Rorarius, Eija
    Vilpas, Sarkku
    Ilomaki, Irma
    Tyrmi, Jaana
    Rantala, Leena
    Laukkanen, Anne-Maria
    LOGOPEDICS PHONIATRICS VOCOLOGY, 2020, 45 (02) : 49 - 56