The Impact of a Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Nasal Polymerase Chain Reaction Protocol on Vancomycin Length of Therapy Among Patients With Skin and Soft Tissue Infections

被引:0
|
作者
Couzo, Anel [1 ]
Griffin, Adia [1 ]
Willis, Courtney M. [1 ]
Mendez, Julio [2 ]
Epps, Kevin L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Pharm, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Infect Dis, Jacksonville, FL USA
关键词
antimicrobial stewardship; skin and soft tissue infection; MRSA nares; HOSPITAL ADMISSION; COLONIZATION;
D O I
10.1177/08971900241273175
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective: We evaluated the impact of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocol on the vancomycin length of therapy (LOT) for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). Design: Retrospective quasi-experimental pre- and post- MRSA nasal PCR protocol implementation study. Setting: Tertiary-care academic medical center in Jacksonville, Florida. Patients: Eligible patients received empiric vancomycin for SSTIs from January 1st to September 30th 2020 (pre-implementation group) and from January 1st to September 30th 2022 (post-implementation group). Intervention: The electronic health system software was modified to provide a best-practice advisory (BPA) prompt to the pharmacist upon order verification of vancomycin for patients with SSTIs. Methods: We reviewed patient records to determine the time from vancomycin prescription to de-escalation. The secondary outcomes were incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), number of vancomycin levels collected, and hospital length of stay (LOS). Results: The study included 131 patients (pre-implementation, n = 86 and post-implementation, n = 45). There was no significant difference in vancomycin length of therapy (LOT) between implementation groups: mean LOT in days and standard deviation (SD) were 2.7 (1.9) and 2.6 (1.3), respectively, p-value 0.493. Of significance, in the post-implementation group, vancomycin LOT between patients with a negative and positive MRSA PCR were 2.3 (1.1) and 3.9 (1.6), p-value 0.006. There was no difference in secondary outcomes. Conclusion: The utilization of the MRSA nasal PCR to guide vancomycin de-escalation did not significantly change the vancomycin LOT, however in the post-implementation group there was a significant difference in vancomycin LOT between negative and positive MRSA PCRs.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 98
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Impact of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nasal Polymerase Chain Reaction Screening Tests on Duration of Vancomycin Therapy for Skin and Soft Tissue Infections
    Jantzen, Aleesha
    Woolever, Nathan
    Treu, Megan
    Stakston, Jaclyn
    Cai, Songlin
    Tempelis, Jennifer
    Kujak, Richard Charles
    Dierkhising, Ross A.
    Dababneh, Ala S.
    Lessard, Sarah
    HOSPITAL PHARMACY, 2025, 60 (01) : 83 - 89
  • [2] Impact of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus polymerase chain reaction nasal swabs on vancomycin utilisation in patients admitted to the intensive care unit with respiratory infections
    Cho, Lance
    Gilbert, Gregory E.
    Zipperlen, Carl
    Danaher, Keri
    Glatt, Aaron E.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE AND RESEARCH, 2022, 52 (01) : 26 - 33
  • [3] The role of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in skin and soft tissue infections
    Bassetti, Matteo
    Carnelutti, Alessia
    Righi, Elda
    CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 30 (02) : 150 - 157
  • [4] Role of nasal methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening in the management of skin and soft tissue infections
    Schleyer, Anneliese M.
    Jarman, Kenneth M.
    Chan, Jeannie D.
    Dellit, Timothy H.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2010, 38 (08) : 657 - 659
  • [5] Use of nasal swabs to tailor antibiotics in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections
    Schleyer, A. M.
    Jarman, K. M.
    Chan, J. D.
    Dellit, T. H.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2007, 22 : 141 - 141
  • [6] Antibiotics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections: the challenge of outpatient therapy
    Pate, Amy J.
    Terribilini, Reno Giovonni
    Ghobadi, Farzaneh
    Azhir, Alaleh
    Barber, Andre
    Pearson, Julie Marie
    Kalantari, Hossein
    Hassen, Getaw W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 32 (02): : 135 - 138
  • [7] New drugs for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections
    Hindy, Joya-Rita
    Haddad, Sara F.
    Kanj, Souha S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2022, 35 (02) : 112 - 119
  • [8] Skin and soft-tissue infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
    Daum, Robert S.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2007, 357 (04): : 380 - 390
  • [9] Diagnostic accuracy of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization to predict methicillin-resistant S aureus soft tissue infections
    Gunderson, Craig G.
    Holleck, Jurgen L.
    Chang, John J.
    Merchant, Naseema
    Lin, Shin
    Gupta, Shaili
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2016, 44 (10) : 1176 - 1177
  • [10] Is linezolid superior to vancomycin for complicated skin and soft tissue infections due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus?: Reply
    Weigelt, J
    Itani, K
    Stevens, D
    Knirsch, C
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2006, 50 (05) : 1910 - 1911