Efficiency and renewability in energy conversion - A system perspective on policy objectives and instruments for climate change mitigation

被引:0
|
作者
Nordenstam, Lena [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Management & Engn, Div Energy Syst, SE-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
[2] Tekn Verken Linkoping AB publ, SE-58115 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Climate Change Mitigation; Efficiency in energy conversion; Greenhouse gas accounting; Attributional and consequential discussion; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; GREENHOUSE-GAS INVENTORIES; INDUSTRIAL EXCESS HEAT; WASTE HEAT; COHERENCE; MATTER; RESPONSIBILITY; PREVENTION; RECOVERY; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.egyr.2024.05.066
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The use of energy from renewable sources and improved efficiency throughout energy conversion, distribution and end-use are important means for mitigating climate change. This paper provides a novel exploration of the relationship between the system boundary in national greenhouse gas (GHG) inventories and policy incentives regarding technologies for GHG emission reduction, including the use of biomass, the use of heat from combined heat and power (CHP) production, industry waste heat, and energy recovery of waste. A novel generalisable applied method for applying a system perspective on a policy coherence analysis is another contribution from this paper. Major findings include the discovery that policies largely favour the use of biomass over technologies for energy efficiency, which does not adhere to the EU energy efficiency first principle. Also, although the EU largely promotes CHP production and high-efficiency CHP production, these technologies are largely opposed by Swedish policies. The following theoretical explanations for this are proposed: (1) The use of attributional GHG inventories for geographical areas induces the use of attributional climate policy objectives; and (2) The use of attributional climate policy objectives induces policies largely supporting the domestic use of technologies which potentially improve one's own climate objective, and largely opposing the domestic use of technologies which potentially worsens one's own climate objective, irrespective of the impact on global GHG emissions. An expansion of the current study including other policy and geographical areas is suggested for future research to further validate the generalisability of these outlined theoretical explanations. In conclusion, as the reduction of global GHG emissions is crucial for mitigating climate change, a shift from an attributional view in national GHG emission governance towards a consequential view is suggested for better efficacy in global GHG emissions reduction.
引用
收藏
页码:6126 / 6149
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An analysis of Chinese policy instruments for climate change mitigation
    Xu, Bo
    Sun, Qie
    Wennersten, Ronald
    Brandt, Nils
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLIMATE CHANGE STRATEGIES AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 2 (04) : 380 - 392
  • [2] Climate change mitigation policy paradigms—national objectives and alignments
    Kirsten Halsnæs
    Amit Garg
    John Christensen
    Helene Ystanes Føyn
    Maryna Karavai
    Emilio La Rovere
    Matthew Bramley
    Xianli Zhu
    Catherine Mitchell
    Joyashree Roy
    Kanako Tanaka
    Hidefumi Katayama
    Carlos Mena
    Imoh Obioh
    Igor Bashmakov
    Stanford Mwakasonda
    Myong-Kyoon Lee
    Marlene Vinluan
    Yu Joe Huang
    Laura Segafredo
    Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 2014, 19 : 45 - 71
  • [3] APPLICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY INSTRUMENTS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SUSTAINABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT: CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION
    Ciegis, Remigijus
    Mikalauskiene, Asta
    Pusinaite, Rasa
    TRANSFORMATIONS IN BUSINESS & ECONOMICS, 2012, 11 (01): : 111 - 123
  • [4] Industrial energy efficiency and climate change mitigation
    Ernst Worrell
    Lenny Bernstein
    Joyashree Roy
    Lynn Price
    Jochen Harnisch
    Energy Efficiency, 2009, 2
  • [5] Industrial energy efficiency and climate change mitigation
    Worrell, Ernst
    Bernstein, Lenny
    Roy, Joyashree
    Price, Lynn
    Harnisch, Jochen
    ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2009, 2 (02) : 109 - 123
  • [6] Climate change mitigation policy paradigms-national objectives and alignments
    Halsnaes, Kirsten
    Garg, Amit
    Christensen, John
    Foyn, Helene Ystanes
    Karavai, Maryna
    La Rovere, Emilio
    Bramley, Matthew
    Zhu, Xianli
    Mitchell, Catherine
    Roy, Joyashree
    Tanaka, Kanako
    Katayama, Hidefumi
    Mena, Carlos
    Obioh, Imoh
    Bashmakov, Igor
    Mwakasonda, Stanford
    Lee, Myong-Kyoon
    Vinluan, Marlene
    Huang, Yu Joe
    Segafredo, Laura
    MITIGATION AND ADAPTATION STRATEGIES FOR GLOBAL CHANGE, 2014, 19 (01) : 45 - 71
  • [7] Assessing the different instruments in climate change mitigation from the perspective of economics
    Endres, A
    GOALS AND ECONOMIC INSTRUMENTS FOR THE ACHIEVEMENT OF GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION IN EUROPE, 1999, : 409 - 425
  • [8] Energy efficiency potentials for global climate change mitigation
    Sugiyama, Masahiro
    Akashi, Osamu
    Wada, Kenichi
    Kanudia, Amit
    Li, Jun
    Weyant, John
    CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2014, 123 (3-4) : 397 - 411
  • [9] Energy efficiency potentials for global climate change mitigation
    Masahiro Sugiyama
    Osamu Akashi
    Kenichi Wada
    Amit Kanudia
    Jun Li
    John Weyant
    Climatic Change, 2014, 123 : 397 - 411
  • [10] Energy Efficiency and Directed Technical Change: Implications for Climate Change Mitigation
    Casey, Gregory
    REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2024, 91 (01): : 192 - 228