Dosimetric Correlation of Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Patients With Breast Cancer Undergoing Hypofractionated Proton Beam Therapy Using Pencil Beam Scanning

被引:0
|
作者
Huang, Eng-Yen [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Ho, Meng Wei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wang, Yu-Ming [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 129 Dapi Rd, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[3] Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Proton & Radiat Therapy Ctr, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[4] Natl Sun Yat Sen Univ, Coll Med, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Sch Med,Dept Radiat Oncol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Univ, Sch Tradit Chinese Med, Taoyuan, Taiwan
关键词
Breast Neoplasms; Proton Therapy; Radiation Dose Hypofractionation; Radiodermatitis; Radiotherapy Dosage; INITIAL REPORT; RADIOTHERAPY; IRRADIATION; TOXICITY; OUTCOMES; SKIN;
D O I
10.4048/jbc.2024.0012
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Pencil-beam scanning (PBS) is a modern delivery technique used in proton beam therapy (PBT) to reduce normal tissue reactions. No dosimetric correlation between dermatitis and PBS has been reported for breast cancer. The current study aimed to investigate the factors associated with grade 2 or higher dermatitis in patients with breast cancer undergoing PBT using PBS. Methods: The medical data of 42 patients with breast cancer who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy between December 2019 and September 2023 were reviewed. All patients received hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT), either 26 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE])/five fractions or 40.05 or 43.5 Gy (RBE)/15 fractions, for the whole breast/chest wall with or without nodal irradiation. The duration of acute radiation dermatitis was defined as within 90 days from the start of radiotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used for univariate and multivariate analyses of the actuarial rates of grade 2-3 dermatitis. Results: Twenty-two (52.4%) and 20 (47.6%) patients were diagnosed with grade 1 and 2 dermatitis, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed a clinical target volume (CTV) >= of 320 cc (p = 0.035) and a skin dose of D10cc >= 38.3 Gy (RBE) (p = 0.009) as independent factors of grade 2 dermatitis. The 10-week cumulative grade 2 dermatitis rates were 88.2%, 39.4%, and 8.3% (p < 0.001) for patients with both high, either high, and neither high CTV and D10cc, respectively. Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on dosimetric correlations for dermatitis in patients with breast cancer who underwent hypofractionated PBT using PBS. In the era of HFRT, skin dose modulation using PBS may reduce the incidence of dermatitis.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 200
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Dosimetric uncertainties in pencil beam proton therapy for breast cancer
    Tommasino, F.
    Lorentini, S.
    Schwarz, M.
    Fellin, F.
    Farace, P.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S68 - S68
  • [2] Proton Pencil Beam Scanning for Rectal Cancer Radiation Therapy
    Kiely, J. P. Blanco
    White, B. M.
    Plastaras, J. P.
    Ben-Josef, E.
    Varman, C.
    Tang, S.
    Tochner, Z. A.
    Metz, J. M.
    Both, S.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 93 (03): : E159 - E159
  • [3] Breast cancer irradiation using proton pencil beam scanning
    Pasztorova, A.
    Kubes, J.
    Andrlik, M.
    Ondrova, B.
    Kasacova, G.
    Dedeckova, K.
    Slavikova, S.
    Vitek, P.
    Vinakurau, S.
    Kvech, J.
    Vondracek, V.
    Navratil, M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2018, 127 : S699 - S700
  • [4] Toxicity outcomes of hypofractionated pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy for spinal Chordomas
    Burela, N.
    Chilukuri, S.
    Nangia, S.
    Patro, K.
    Mp, N.
    Gaikwad, U.
    Sundar, S.
    Thimma, R.
    Rajendran, A.
    Sulaiman, A.
    Sharma, D.
    Panda, P. K.
    Jalali, R.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : S1166 - S1166
  • [5] Impact of Interfractional Motion On Hypofractionated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Moteabbed, M.
    Trofimov, A.
    Sharp, G.
    Wang, Y.
    Zietman, A.
    Efstathiou, J.
    Lu, H.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (06) : 3683 - 3683
  • [6] Hearing in cancer patients with skull base tumors undergoing pencil beam scanning proton therapy
    Bachtiary, B.
    Veraguth, D.
    Roos, N.
    von Felten, S.
    Weber, D.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2022, 170 : S744 - S745
  • [7] Correlation between dosimetric parameters and acute dermatitis of hypofractionated breast radiation
    Bohli, M.
    Fessi, Z.
    Jaffel, H.
    Tbessi, S.
    Yahyaoui, J.
    Moujahed, R.
    Hamdoun, A.
    Kochbati, L.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2020, 152 : S1074 - S1074
  • [8] Dosimetric Comparison of Patient Alignment Techniques in Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer
    Remick, J.
    Snider, J. W., III
    Diwanji, T.
    Houser, T.
    Langner, U.
    Zhu, M.
    Bentzen, S. M.
    Feigenberg, S. J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2017, 99 (02): : E714 - E714
  • [9] Toxicity Outcomes of Hypofractionated Image Guided Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Beam Therapy for Spinal Chordomas
    Chilukuri, S.
    Burela, N.
    Nangia, S.
    Adhityan, R.
    Gaikwad, U. S.
    Sundar, S.
    Thimma, R.
    Mathew, A.
    Sulaiman, A.
    Jalali, R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E312 - E313
  • [10] Collimating individual beamlets in pencil beam scanning proton therapy, a dosimetric investigation
    Holmes, Jason
    Shen, Jiajian
    Patel, Samir H.
    Wong, William W.
    Foote, Robert L.
    Bues, Martin
    Liu, Wei
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12