An interdisciplinary overview of levee setback benefits: Supporting spatial planning and implementation of riverine nature-based solutions

被引:4
|
作者
van Rees, Charles B. [1 ,2 ]
Chambers, Matthew L. [3 ]
Catalano, Angela J. [4 ]
Buhr, Daniel X. [3 ]
Mansur, Andressa Vianna [5 ]
Hall, Damon M. [4 ]
Nelson, Alec [6 ]
Suedel, Burton [7 ]
Hawley, Robert J. [8 ]
Bledsoe, Brian [3 ]
Nibbelink, Nate [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Odum Sch Ecol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Univ Georgia, River Basin Ctr, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Sch Environm Civil Agr & Mech Engn, Athens, GA USA
[4] Northeastern Univ Marine & Environm Sci, Sch Publ Policy & Urban Affairs, Boston, MA USA
[5] BC3 Basque Ctr Climate Change, Bilbao, Spain
[6] Univ Georgia, Warnell Sch Forestry & Nat Resources, Athens, GA USA
[7] US Army Corps Engineers, Engineer Res & Dev Ctr, Engn Nat Program, Vicksburg, MS USA
[8] Sustainable Streams LLC, Louisville, KY USA
来源
WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-WATER | 2024年 / 11卷 / 06期
关键词
biodiversity conservation; climate change; green infrastructure; natural infrastructure; rivers; MULTICRITERIA DECISION-ANALYSIS; MIDDLE MISSISSIPPI RIVER; FLOOD RISK; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; NITRATE REMOVAL; COSUMNES RIVER; ILLINOIS RIVER; SOIL-NITROGEN; WATER-QUALITY; FLOODPLAINS;
D O I
10.1002/wat2.1750
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Nature-based solutions (NbS, and related concepts like natural infrastructure, Ecosystem-based Adaptation, and green infrastructure) are increasingly recognized as multi-benefit strategies for addressing the critical sustainability challenges of the Anthropocene, including the climate emergency and biodiversity crisis. Mainstreaming NbS in professional practice requires strategic, landscape-level planning integrating multiple sources of benefits and their synergies and trade-offs. Levee setbacks (LS) are among the best-studied riverine NbS with recognized benefits for flood risk management, drought resilience, water quality management, recreational opportunities, and ecological restoration for biodiversity. Although awareness of the multifarious benefits of LS as forms of Natural Capital is growing, implementation remains ad-hoc and opportunistic. To address this critical implementation gap for one major example of NbS, we review and synthesize literature across diverse disciplines to provide an overview of the primary social, economic, and ecological mechanisms that affect the co-benefit delivery of LS projects. Next, to make this information relevant to NbS practitioners, we link these mechanisms to spatial metrics that can be used to approximate the relative magnitude of project benefits and costs across these mechanisms. Finally, we highlight examples of key synergies and trade-offs among benefits that should be considered for LS planning. This synthetic approach is intended to familiarize readers with the diverse potential benefits of LS, and provide an understanding of how to select and prioritize potential sites for further study and implementation. Synergies and trade-offs among important benefit drivers abound, and social equity concerns will be paramount in ensuring the successful implementation of LS and other NbS in the future. This article is categorized under: Engineering Water > Sustainable Engineering of Water Engineering Water > Planning Water Water and Life > Nature of Freshwater Ecosystems
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Nature in nature-based solutions in urban planning
    de Oliveira, Fabiano Lemes
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2025, 256
  • [2] The Circular Benefits of Participation in Nature-Based Solutions
    Cardenas, Macarena L.
    Wilde, Vanessa
    Hagen-Zanker, Alex
    Seifert-Dahnn, Isabel
    Hutchins, Michael G.
    Loiselle, Steven
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [3] Sustainable Spatial Planning Based on Ecosystem Services, Green Infrastructure and Nature-Based Solutions
    Lai, Sabrina
    Zoppi, Corrado
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 16 (06)
  • [4] Planning of nature-based Solutions in River Landscapes
    不详
    WASSERWIRTSCHAFT, 2022, 112 (7-8) : 77 - 77
  • [5] Complementary ideas for the implementation of nature-based solutions
    Del Pino, Diego Portugal
    Marquez, Jonatan Fredricson
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2023, 141 : 146 - 157
  • [6] A Framework for Assessing Benefits of Implemented Nature-Based Solutions
    Watkin, Linda J.
    Ruangpan, Laddaporn
    Vojinovic, Zoran
    Weesakul, Sutat
    Torres, Arlex Sanchez
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (23)
  • [7] Editorial: The Benefits of Nature-Based Solutions to Psychological Health
    Spano, Giuseppina
    Dadvand, Payam
    Sanesi, Giovanni
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [8] The science, policy and practice of nature-based solutions: An interdisciplinary perspective
    Nesshover, Carsten
    Assmuth, Timo
    Irvine, Katherine N.
    Rusch, Graciela M.
    Waylen, Kerry A.
    Delbaere, Ben
    Haase, Dagmar
    Jones-Walters, Lawrence
    Keune, Hans
    Kovacs, Eszter
    Krauze, Kinga
    Kulvik, Mart
    Rey, Freddy
    Van Dijk, Jiska
    Vistad, Odd Inge
    Wilkinson, Mark E.
    Wittmer, Heidi
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 579 : 1215 - 1227
  • [9] Supporting Nature-Based Solutions via Nature-Based Thinking across European and Latin American cities
    Geovana Mercado
    Tom Wild
    Jaime Hernandez-Garcia
    Mariana D. Baptista
    Martina van Lierop
    Olivia Bina
    Andy Inch
    Åsa Ode Sang
    Arjen Buijs
    Cynnamon Dobbs
    Alexis Vásquez
    Alexander van der Jagt
    Fabio Salbitano
    Roberto Falanga
    Juan David Amaya-Espinel
    Mafalda de Matos Pereira
    Thomas B. Randrup
    Ambio, 2024, 53 : 79 - 94
  • [10] Supporting Nature-Based Solutions via Nature-Based Thinking across European and Latin American cities
    Mercado, Geovana
    Wild, Tom
    Hernandez-Garcia, Jaime
    Baptista, Mariana D.
    van Lierop, Martina
    Bina, Olivia
    Inch, Andy
    Ode Sang, Asa
    Buijs, Arjen
    Dobbs, Cynnamon
    Vasquez, Alexis
    van der Jagt, Alexander
    Salbitano, Fabio
    Falanga, Roberto
    Amaya-Espinel, Juan David
    de Matos Pereira, Mafalda
    Randrup, Thomas B.
    AMBIO, 2024, 53 (01) : 79 - 94