A comprehensive overview of barriers and strategies for AI implementation in healthcare: Mixed-method design

被引:5
|
作者
Nair, Monika [1 ]
Svedberg, Petra [1 ]
Larsson, Ingrid [1 ]
Nygren, Jens M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Halmstad Univ, Sch Hlth & Welf, Halmstad, Sweden
来源
PLOS ONE | 2024年 / 19卷 / 08期
关键词
CLINICAL DECISION-SUPPORT; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; SYSTEM; ADOPTION; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0305949
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Implementation of artificial intelligence systems for healthcare is challenging. Understanding the barriers and implementation strategies can impact their adoption and allows for better anticipation and planning. This study's objective was to create a detailed inventory of barriers to and strategies for AI implementation in healthcare to support advancements in methods and implementation processes in healthcare. A sequential explanatory mixed method design was used. Firstly, scoping reviews and systematic literature reviews were identified using PubMed. Selected studies included empirical cases of AI implementation and use in clinical practice. As the reviews were deemed insufficient to fulfil the aim of the study, data collection shifted to the primary studies included in those reviews. The primary studies were screened by title and abstract, and thereafter read in full text. Then, data on barriers to and strategies for AI implementation were extracted from the included articles, thematically coded by inductive analysis, and summarized. Subsequently, a direct qualitative content analysis of 69 interviews with healthcare leaders and healthcare professionals confirmed and added results from the literature review. Thirty-eight empirical cases from the six identified scoping and literature reviews met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Barriers to and strategies for AI implementation were grouped under three phases of implementation (planning, implementing, and sustaining the use) and were categorized into eleven concepts; Leadership, Buy-in, Change management, Engagement, Workflow, Finance and human resources, Legal, Training, Data, Evaluation and monitoring, Maintenance. Ethics emerged as a twelfth concept through qualitative analysis of the interviews. This study illustrates the inherent challenges and useful strategies in implementing AI in healthcare practice. Future research should explore various aspects of leadership, collaboration and contracts among key stakeholders, legal strategies surrounding clinicians' liability, solutions to ethical dilemmas, infrastructure for efficient integration of AI in workflows, and define decision points in the implementation process.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Facilitators and barriers to policy implementation: A mixed-method study on the plurilingual policy in Luxembourg
    Simoes Loureiro, Kevin
    Hadjar, Andreas
    EUROPEAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [2] Barriers and enablers for the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in China: a mixed-method study
    Jin, Yinghui
    Li, Zimeng
    Han, Fei
    Huang, Di
    Huang, Qiao
    Cao, Yue
    Weng, Hong
    Zeng, Xian-Tao
    Wang, Xinghuan
    Shang, Hong-Cai
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (09):
  • [3] Promoters and Barriers to Implementation of Tracheal Intubation Airway Safety Bundle: A Mixed-Method Analysis
    Davis, Katherine Finn
    Napolitano, Natalie
    Li, Simon
    Buffman, Hayley
    Rehder, Kyle
    Pinto, Matthew
    Nett, Sholeen
    Jarvis, J. Dean
    Kamat, Pradip
    Sanders, Ronald C., Jr.
    Turner, David A.
    Sullivan, Janice E.
    Bysani, Kris
    Lee, Anthony
    Parker, Margaret
    Adu-Darko, Michelle
    Giuliano, John, Jr.
    Biagas, Katherine
    Nadkarni, Vinay
    Nishisaki, Akira
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 18 (10) : 965 - 972
  • [4] A comprehensive overview of barriers and facilitators in the design and implementation of bundled payment contracts.
    Steenhuis, Sander
    Struijs, Jeroen
    van der Hijden, Eric
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTEGRATED CARE, 2018, 18
  • [5] Moving beyond barriers: a mixed-method study to develop evidence-based strategies to improve implementation of PROMs in clinical oncology care
    Boomstra, Eva
    Walraven, Iris
    van der Ploeg, Iris M. C.
    Wouters, Michel W. J. M.
    van de Kamp, Maaike W.
    Dirven, Richard
    Albers, Elaine
    Fraterman, Itske
    Poulissen, Marit
    van de Poll-franse, Lonneke V.
    de Ligt, Kelly M.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2025, 34 (01) : 173 - 188
  • [6] Current Use and Barriers to Healthcare Service Utilization Among Afghan Women Refugees: A Mixed-Method Study
    Moudi, Zahra
    Mollashahi, Sedighe S.
    Nouri, Narges
    Zaboli, Maryam
    Arabnezhad, Leyla
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF NURSING AND MIDWIFERY RESEARCH, 2025, 30 (02) : 182 - 191
  • [7] Identifying barriers and strategies for achieving competency in removable prosthodontics in undergraduate dental students: a mixed-method study
    Watcharapong Mongkolrattanasit
    Veerit Tanvarasethee
    Kittapob Thangjantaraprapab
    Supachai Chuenjitwongsa
    Nareudee Limpuangthip
    BMC Oral Health, 24
  • [8] What Determines AI Adoption in Companies? Mixed-Method Evidence
    Polisetty, Aruna
    Chakraborty, Debarun
    Sowmya, G.
    Kar, Arpan Kumar
    Pahari, Subhajit
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2024, 64 (03) : 370 - 387
  • [9] Identifying barriers and strategies for achieving competency in removable prosthodontics in undergraduate dental students: a mixed-method study
    Mongkolrattanasit, Watcharapong
    Tanvarasethee, Veerit
    Thangjantaraprapab, Kittapob
    Chuenjitwongsa, Supachai
    Limpuangthip, Nareudee
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [10] Factors affecting implementation of digital lean in healthcare in the post-COVID world - mixed-method approach
    Mishra, Vinaytosh
    Sharma, Mohita G.
    TQM JOURNAL, 2024, 36 (06): : 1651 - 1664