Multi-perspective evaluation on spent lithium iron phosphate recycling process: For next-generation technology option

被引:1
|
作者
Li, Hongkai [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xueli [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Wenjie [1 ,2 ]
Li, Peihua [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xin [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Xiaoming [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Wu, Bin [4 ]
Gao, Wenfang [5 ]
Wen, Jiawei [1 ,2 ]
Huang, Guoyong [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Shengming [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Coll New Energy & Mat, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
[2] China Univ Petr, State Key Lab Heavy Oil, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
[3] Ganfeng Lithium Grp Co Ltd, Xinyu 338000, Peoples R China
[4] Suzhou Botree Cycling Sci & Tech Co Ltd, Suzhou 215128, Peoples R China
[5] Hebei Univ Technol, Sch Energy & Environm Engn, Tianjin 300401, Peoples R China
[6] Tsinghua Univ, Inst Nucl & New Energy Technol, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[7] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing Key Lab Fine Ceram, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Lithium iron phosphate; Life cycle assessment; Environmental impacts; Multi-perspective evaluation; ION BATTERIES; RECOVERY; LIFEPO4; REGENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.121983
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The recycling of spent lithium iron phosphate batteries has recently become a focus topic. Consequently, evaluating different spent lithium iron phosphate recycling processes becomes necessary for industrial development. Here, based on multiple perspectives of environment, economy and technology, four typical spent lithium iron phosphate recovery processes (Hydro-A: hydrometallurgical total leaching recovery process; Hydro-B(H2O2/O2): hydrometallurgical selective lithium extraction process; Pyro: Pyrometallurgical recovery process; Direct: Direct regeneration process) were compared comprehensively. The comprehensive evaluation study uses environment, economy and technology as evaluation indicators, and uses the entropy weight method and analytic hierarchy process to couple the comprehensive indicator weights. Results show that the comprehensive evaluation values of Hydro-A, Hydro-B (H2O2), Hydro-B (O2), Pyro and Direct are 0.347, 0.421, 0.442, 0.099 and 0.857, respectively. Therefore, the technological maturity of Direct should be further improved to enable early industrialization. On this basis, this study conducted a quantitative evaluation of the spent lithium iron phosphate recycling process by comprehensively considering environmental, economic and technical factors, providing further guidance for the formulation of recycling processes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Comprehensive Technology for Recycling and Regenerating Materials from Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Battery
    Lei, Shuya
    Sun, Wei
    Yang, Yue
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 58 (08) : 3609 - 3628
  • [2] Toward Direct Regeneration of Spent Lithium-Ion Batteries: A Next-Generation Recycling Method
    Wang, Junxiong
    Ma, Jun
    Zhuang, Zhaofeng
    Liang, Zheng
    Jia, Kai
    Ji, Guanjun
    Zhou, Guangmin
    Cheng, Hui-Ming
    CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2024, 124 (05) : 2839 - 2887
  • [3] Selective leaching process for efficient and rapid recycling of spent lithium iron phosphate batteries
    Xiong, Yuchuan
    Guo, Zhenzhen
    Mei, Tao
    Han, Yurong
    Wang, Yueyue
    Xiong, Xin
    Tang, Yifan
    Wang, Xianbao
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2023, 41 (11) : 1613 - 1621
  • [4] Combined mechanical process recycling technology for recovering copper and aluminium components of spent lithium-iron phosphate batteries
    Bi, Haijun
    Zhu, Huabing
    Zu, Lei
    He, Shuanghua
    Gao, Yong
    Peng, Jielin
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2019, 37 (08) : 767 - 780
  • [5] Direct Recycling Strategy for Spent Lithium Iron Phosphate Powder: an Efficient and Wastewater-Free Process
    Hu, Guorong
    Gong, Yifan
    Peng, Zhongdong
    Du, Ke
    Huang, Min
    Wu, Jiahui
    Guan, Dichang
    Zeng, Jingyao
    Zhang, Baichao
    Cao, Yanbing
    ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING, 2022, 10 (35) : 11606 - 11616
  • [6] A perspective on multi-channel technology for the next-generation of GaN power devices
    Nela, Luca
    Xiao, Ming
    Zhang, Yuhao
    Matioli, Elison
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 2022, 120 (19)
  • [7] Recycling of spent lithium iron phosphate batteries: Research progress based on environmental protection and sustainable development technology
    Cui, Ke
    Zhao, Ming-Chun
    Li, Yiran
    Atrens, Andrej
    Zhang, Fuqin
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2025, 354
  • [8] Low-temperature thermal pretreatment process for recycling inner core of spent lithium iron phosphate batteries
    Bi, Haijun
    Zhu, Huabing
    Zu, Lei
    Gao, Yong
    Gao, Song
    Peng, Jielin
    Li, Huabing
    WASTE MANAGEMENT & RESEARCH, 2021, 39 (01) : 146 - 155
  • [9] Review on full-component green recycling of spent lithium iron phosphate cathode materials: From the perspective of economy and efficiency
    Jiang, Si-qi
    Li, Xi-guang
    Gao, Qiang
    Lyu, Xian-jun
    Akanyange, Stephen Nyabire
    Jiao, Tian-tian
    Zhu, Xiang-nan
    SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 324
  • [10] Research and Development Trends of Lithium Iron Phosphate for Next-Generation Lithium-Ion Batteries with Emphasis on Solid-State Electrolytes
    Bae, Joonho
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN ELECTROCHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 27 (04): : 115 - 124