Pancreaticobiliary Cytology Practice in 2021: Results of a College of American Pathologists Survey

被引:2
|
作者
Li, Zaibo [1 ]
Tabbara, Sana O. [2 ]
Nwosu, Ann [3 ]
Souers, Rhona J. [3 ]
Goyal, Abha [4 ]
Kurian, Elizabeth M. [5 ]
Lin, Xiaoqi [6 ]
Vandenbussche, Christopher [7 ]
Nguyen, Lananh N. [8 ]
机构
[1] Ohio State Univ, Dept Pathol, 410 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[2] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Dept Pathol, Tampa, FL USA
[3] Coll Amer Pathologists, Biostat, Northfield, IL USA
[4] Weill Cornell Med, Dept Pathol, New York, NY USA
[5] Univ Texas Southwestern Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Dallas, TX USA
[6] Northwestern Univ, Dept Pathol, Chicago, IL USA
[7] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Baltimore, MD USA
[8] Univ Toronto, Dept Lab Med & Pathobiol, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
FINE-NEEDLE-ASPIRATION; EUS-GUIDED FNA; BILIARY BRUSH CYTOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PAPANICOLAOU SOCIETY; BIOPSY; CHOLANGIOCARCINOMA; YIELD; UTILITY; CANCER;
D O I
10.5858/arpa.2023-0167-CP
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Context.-The College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys provide national benchmarks of pathology practice. Objective.-To investigate pancreaticobiliary cytology practice in domestic and international laboratories in 2021. Design.-We analyzed data from the CAP Pancreaticobiliary Cytology Practice Supplemental Questionnaire that was distributed to laboratories participating in the 2021 CAP Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program. Results.-Ninety-three percent (567 of 612) of respondent laboratories routinely evaluated pancreaticobiliary cytology specimens. Biliary brushing (85%) was the most common pancreaticobiliary cytology specimen evaluated, followed by pancreatic fine -needle aspiration (79%). The most used sampling methods reported by 235 laboratories were 22 -gauge needle for fine -needle aspiration (62%) and SharkCore needle for fine -needle biopsy (27%). Cell block was the most used slide preparation method (76%), followed by liquid -based cytology (59%) for pancreatic cystic lesions. Up to 95% (303 of 320) of laboratories performed rapid on -site evaluation (ROSE) on pancreatic solid lesions, while 56% (180 of 320) performed ROSE for cystic lesions. Thirty-six percent (193 of 530) of laboratories used the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology System for Reporting Pancreaticobiliary Cytology in 2021. Among all institution types, significant differences in specimen volume, specimen type, ROSE practice, and case sign -out were identified. Additionally, significant differences in specimen type, slide preparation, and ROSE practice were found. Conclusions.-This is the first survey from the CAP to investigate pancreaticobiliary cytology practice. The findings reveal significant differences among institution types and between domestic and international laboratories. These data provide a baseline for future studies in a variety of practice settings. (Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2024;148:677-685; doi: 10.5858/ arpa.2023-0167-CP)
引用
收藏
页码:677 / 685
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Strong Job Market for Pathologists: Results From the 2021 College of American Pathologists Practice Leader Survey
    Gross, David J.
    Robboy, Stanley J.
    Cohen, Michael B.
    Vernon, Lori
    Park, Jason Y.
    Crawford, James M.
    Karcher, Donald S.
    Wheeler, Thomas M.
    Black-Schaffer, Stephen
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2023, 147 (04) : 434 - 441
  • [2] Trends in Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology Practices Results From a College of American Pathologists 2016 Practice Survey
    Mais, Daniel D.
    Crothers, Barbara A.
    Davey, Diane Davis
    Natale, Kristen E.
    Nayar, Ritu
    Souers, Rhona J.
    Blond, Barbara J.
    Hackman, Sarah
    Tworek, Joseph A.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2019, 143 (11) : 1364 - 1372
  • [3] A Survey of Practice Patterns of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology (NGC)
    Moriarty, A. T.
    Nayar, R.
    Auger, M.
    Kurtycz, D. F. I.
    Thomas, N.
    Laucirica, R.
    Padmanabhan, V.
    Souers, R.
    Schwartz, M. R.
    Fraig, M.
    LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2013, 93 : 99A - 99A
  • [4] A Survey of Practice Patterns of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology (NGC)
    Moriarty, A. T.
    Nayar, R.
    Auger, M.
    Kurtyez, D. F. I.
    Thomas, N.
    Laucirica, R.
    Padmanabhan, V.
    Souers, R.
    Schwartz, M. R.
    Fraig, M.
    MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2013, 26 : 99A - 99A
  • [5] Human Papillomavirus Genotyping Testing Practice in 2014 Results of a College of American Pathologists National Survey
    Zhao, Chengquan
    Crothers, Barbara A.
    Ghofrani, Mohiedean
    Li, Zaibo
    Souers, Rhona J.
    Hussain, Mujtaba
    Fan, Fang
    Ocal, Idris Tolgay
    Goodrich, Kelly
    Shen, Rulong
    Davey, Diane D.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 140 (12) : 1364 - 1370
  • [6] Nongynecologic Cytology Practice Patterns A Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytopathology
    Moriarty, Ann T.
    Nayar, Ritu
    Auger, Manon
    Kurtycz, Daniel F. I.
    Thomas, Nicole
    Laucirica, Rodolfo
    Padmanabhan, Vijayalakshmi
    Souers, Rhona J.
    Schwartz, Mary R.
    Fraig, Mostafa M.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 138 (07) : 885 - 889
  • [7] The State of the Job Market for Pathologists Evidence From the College of American Pathologists Practice Leader Survey
    Gross, David J.
    Black-Schaffer, W. Stephen
    Hoffman, Robert D.
    Karcher, Donald S.
    Estrada, Edith Lopez
    Robboy, Stanley J.
    Cohen, Michael B.
    ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2020, 144 (04) : 420 - 426
  • [8] COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS SURVEY - INTRODUCTION
    KING, JW
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1974, 61 (06) : 899 - 899
  • [9] COLLEGE-OF-AMERICAN-PATHOLOGISTS SURVEY
    不详
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1976, 66 (01) : 159 - &
  • [10] INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON OF GLYCOHEMOGLOBIN RESULTS - COLLEGE OF AMERICAN PATHOLOGISTS SURVEY DATA
    LITTLE, RR
    WIEDMEYER, HM
    ENGLAND, JD
    NAITO, HK
    GOLDSTEIN, DE
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 1991, 37 (10) : 1725 - 1729