Landslide susceptibility prediction and mapping in Loess Plateau based on different machine learning algorithms by hybrid factors screening: Case study of Xunyi County, Shaanxi Province, China

被引:3
|
作者
Liu, Xiaokang [1 ,2 ]
Shao, Shuai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Shao, Shengjun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Xian Univ Technol, Inst Geoengn, POB 710048, Xian, Peoples R China
[2] Shaanxi Prov Key Laboratoty Loess Mech & Engn, POB 710048, Xian, Peoples R China
[3] Xian Univ Technol, Dept Architecture & Urban Planning, POB 710048, Xian, Peoples R China
关键词
Landslide susceptibility; Loess Plateau; Machine learning; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORK; 3 GORGES RESERVOIR; LOGISTIC-REGRESSION; RANDOM FOREST; CONDITIONING FACTORS; SPATIAL PREDICTION; FREQUENCY RATIO; DECISION TREE; MODELS; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.asr.2024.03.074
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
Machine learning models are widely used for landslide susceptibility prediction (LSP). To better develop a landslide susceptibility prediction model for the Loess Plateau, this study compared different machine-learning models (Logistic regression (LR), support vector machines (SVM), random forests (RF), Na & imath;<spacing diaeresis>ve Bayes (NB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP)). Using Xunyi County, China as the study area, 1096 landslides were collected and divided into a training set (70%) and a test set (30%). Significant influencing factors were selected from 20 landslide factors using GeoDetector. The relationships between these factors and landslides were determined by normalized frequency ratios. Five trained machine learning models calculated landslide susceptibility indices and generated landslide susceptibility maps. Additionally, the accuracy (ACC), precision (PRE), recall (REC), F1 score, AUC values, LSI distribution characteristics, and overlay analysis of historical landslides with LSM were used to evaluate the performance of the models. The results show that the LSP results of the five models are generally reasonable. The results further indicated that the use of GeoDetector was able to filter out the main factors of eolian landslides, improving the predictive performance of the model and obtaining better LSMs. The RF model had the best overall performance, followed by the SVM, and the MLP model created LSM high susceptibility zones that could contain the highest number of historical landslides. The q-values of factor contributions indicate that elevation, NDVI, rainfall, POI kernel density, and RDLS are the main factors controlling landslides, which need to be paid attention to for landslide control in the Loess Plateau region. The results of this study can provide a reference for the follow-up study of landslide prevention and control, especially landslide susceptibility modeling in the Loess Plateau. (c) 2024 COSPAR. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 210
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping Landslide Susceptibility Using Machine Learning Algorithms and GIS: A Case Study in Shexian County, Anhui Province, China
    Wang, Zitao
    Liu, Qimeng
    Liu, Yu
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2020, 12 (12): : 1 - 18
  • [2] Mapping Landslide Sensitivity Based on Machine Learning: A Case Study in Ankang City, Shaanxi Province, China
    Zhao, Baoxin
    Zhu, Jingzhong
    Hu, Youbiao
    Liu, Qimeng
    Liu, Yu
    GEOFLUIDS, 2022, 2022
  • [3] Assessment of landslide susceptibility along mountain highways based on different machine learning algorithms and mapping units by hybrid factors screening and sample optimization
    Sun, Deliang
    Gu, Qingyu
    Wen, Haijia
    Xu, Jiahui
    Zhang, Yalan
    Shi, Shuxian
    Xue, Mengmeng
    Zhou, Xinzhi
    GONDWANA RESEARCH, 2023, 123 : 89 - 106
  • [4] A Novel Hybrid Method for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping-Based GeoDetector and Machine Learning Cluster: A Case of Xiaojin County, China
    Xie, Wei
    Li, Xiaoshuang
    Jian, Wenbin
    Yang, Yang
    Liu, Hongwei
    Robledo, Luis F.
    Nie, Wen
    ISPRS INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEO-INFORMATION, 2021, 10 (02)
  • [5] Conditioning factors determination for mapping and prediction of landslide susceptibility using machine learning algorithms
    Al-Najjar, Husam A. H.
    Kalantar, Bahareh
    Pradhan, Biswjaeet
    Saeidi, Vahideh
    EARTH RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL REMOTE SENSING/GIS APPLICATIONS X, 2019, 11156
  • [6] Landslide susceptibility mapping in Badakhshan province, Afghanistan: a comparative study of machine learning algorithms
    Qasimi, Abdul Baser
    Isazade, Vahid
    Enayat, Enayatullah
    Nadry, Zabihullah
    Majidi, Abdul Hallim
    GEOCARTO INTERNATIONAL, 2023, 38 (01)
  • [7] Landslide Susceptibility Prediction Using Machine Learning Methods: A Case Study of Landslides in the Yinghu Lake Basin in Shaanxi
    Ma, Sheng
    Chen, Jian
    Wu, Saier
    Li, Yurou
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (22)
  • [8] Comparison of Different Machine Learning Methods for Debris Flow Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study in the Sichuan Province, China
    Xiong, Ke
    Adhikari, Basanta Raj
    Stamatopoulos, Constantine A.
    Zhan, Yu
    Wu, Shaolin
    Dong, Zhongtao
    Di, Baofeng
    REMOTE SENSING, 2020, 12 (02)
  • [9] Landslide Susceptibility Evaluation of Machine Learning Based on Information Volume and Frequency Ratio: A Case Study of Weixin County, China
    He, Wancai
    Chen, Guoping
    Zhao, Junsan
    Lin, Yilin
    Qin, Bingui
    Yao, Wanlu
    Cao, Qing
    SENSORS, 2023, 23 (05)
  • [10] Evaluation of Three Different Machine Learning Methods for Object-Based Artificial Terrace Mapping-A Case Study of the Loess Plateau, China
    Ding, Hu
    Na, Jiaming
    Jiang, Shangjing
    Zhu, Jie
    Liu, Kai
    Fu, Yingchun
    Li, Fayuan
    REMOTE SENSING, 2021, 13 (05) : 1 - 19