Organizational responses to institutional complexity stemming from emerging logics: The role of individuals

被引:46
|
作者
Bertels, Stephanie [1 ]
Lawrence, Thomas B. [2 ]
机构
[1] Simon Fraser Univ, Beedie Sch Business, 500 Granville St, Vancouver, BC V6C 1W6, Canada
[2] Univ Oxford, Said Business Sch, Pk End St, Oxford OX1 1HP, England
关键词
institutional change; institutional theory; organizational change; qualitative methods; research methods; strategy as practice; topics and perspectives; INHABITED INSTITUTIONS; STRATEGIC RESPONSES; WORK; MULTICULTURALISM; RESPONSIVENESS; EDUCATION; DYNAMICS; CANADA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1177/1476127016641726
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article, we address two important gaps in the study of organizational responses to institutional complexity. First, we examine how organizations respond to institutional complexity associated with newly emerging logics that lack well-defined sets of practices; although previous research has examined logics new to a field, those logics have tended to be well-established in other domains. Based on the responses of 10 Canadian public schools to the emerging logic of Aboriginal distinctiveness, we identify four organizational responses (reinterpretation, advocacy, isolation, and integration) that we argue are distinctive of emerging logics. Second, we explore how individuals in organizations shape organizational responses to institutional complexity. We show how individuals' sensemaking and institutional biographies combine to affect the kinds of action in which organizations engage (discursive or practical) and the scope of that action (expansive across the organization or confined to a subset of actors).
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 372
页数:37
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses
    Greenwood, Royston
    Raynard, Mia
    Kodeih, Farah
    Micelotta, Evelyn R.
    Lounsbury, Michael
    ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT ANNALS, 2011, 5 : 317 - 371
  • [2] The Multiplicity of Institutional Logics and the Heterogeneity of Organizational Responses
    Greenwood, Royston
    Magan Diaz, Amalia
    Li, Stan Xiao
    Cespedes Lorente, Jose
    ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2010, 21 (02) : 521 - 539
  • [3] Individual responses to competing institutional logics in emerging markets
    Minbaeva, Dana
    Muratbekova-Touron, Maral
    Nayir, Dilek Zamantili
    Moreira, Solon
    INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2021, 30 (04)
  • [4] Institutional logics and organizational green transformation: Evidence from the agricultural industry in emerging economies
    Yang, Yang
    Jiang, Yan
    Yang, Ying
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2024, 370
  • [5] Institutional logics and organizational change: the role of place and time
    Diego Ponte
    Caterina Pesci
    Journal of Management and Governance, 2022, 26 : 891 - 924
  • [6] Institutional logics and organizational change: the role of place and time
    Ponte, Diego
    Pesci, Caterina
    JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT AND GOVERNANCE, 2022, 26 (03): : 891 - 924
  • [7] Navigating institutional demands: Organizational responses to institutional complexity in megaproject delivery
    Fu, Yafan
    Leiringer, Roine
    Gottlieb, Stefan Christoffer
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROJECT MANAGEMENT, 2024, 42 (04)
  • [8] Firms? responses to corporate governance reform in an emerging economy from the perspective of institutional logics
    Min, Byung-Seong
    Chen, Chien-Nan
    Tien, Chengli
    JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2022, 147 : 278 - 289
  • [9] Organizational Responses to Contending Institutional Logics: The Moderating Effect of Group Dynamics
    Bjerregaard, Toke
    Jonasson, Charlotte
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 25 (04) : 651 - 666
  • [10] Filtering Institutional Logics: Community Logic Variation and Differential Responses to the Institutional Complexity of Toxic Waste
    Lee, Min-Dong Paul
    Lounsbury, Michael
    ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (03) : 847 - 866