Enhancing Robustness in Precast Modular Frame Optimization: Integrating NSGA-II, NSGA-III, and RVEA for Sustainable Infrastructure

被引:3
|
作者
Ruiz-Velez, Andres [1 ]
Garcia, Jose [2 ]
Alcala, Julian [1 ]
Yepes, Victor [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Valencia, Inst Concrete Sci & Technol ICITECH, Valencia 46022, Spain
[2] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Sch Construct & Transportat Engn, Valparaiso 2362804, Chile
关键词
multi-objective optimization; multi-criteria decision-making; NSGA-II; NSGA-III; RVEA; SAW; FUCA; TOPSIS; PROMETHEE; VIKOR;
D O I
10.3390/math12101478
中图分类号
O1 [数学];
学科分类号
0701 ; 070101 ;
摘要
The advancement toward sustainable infrastructure presents complex multi-objective optimization (MOO) challenges. This paper expands the current understanding of design frameworks that balance cost, environmental impacts, social factors, and structural integrity. Integrating MOO with multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM), the study targets enhancements in life cycle sustainability for complex engineering projects using precast modular road frames. Three advanced evolutionary algorithms-NSGA-II, NSGA-III, and RVEA-are optimized and deployed to address sustainability objectives under performance constraints. The efficacy of these algorithms is gauged through a comparative analysis, and a robust MCDM approach is applied to nine non-dominated solutions, employing SAW, FUCA, TOPSIS, PROMETHEE, and VIKOR decision-making techniques. An entropy theory-based method ensures systematic, unbiased criteria weighting, augmenting the framework's capacity to pinpoint designs balancing life cycle sustainability. The results reveal that NSGA-III is the algorithm converging towards the most cost-effective solutions, surpassing NSGA-II and RVEA by 21.11% and 10.07%, respectively, while maintaining balanced environmental and social impacts. The RVEA achieves up to 15.94% greater environmental efficiency than its counterparts. The analysis of non-dominated solutions identifies the A4 design, utilizing 35 MPa concrete and B500S steel, as the most sustainable alternative across 80% of decision-making algorithms. The ranking correlation coefficients above 0.94 demonstrate consistency among decision-making techniques, underscoring the robustness of the integrated MOO and MCDM framework. The results in this paper expand the understanding of the applicability of novel techniques for enhancing engineering practices and advocate for a comprehensive strategy that employs advanced MOO algorithms and MCDM to enhance sustainable infrastructure development.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] On NSGA-II and NSGA-III in Portfolio Management
    Awad, Mahmoud
    Abouhawwash, Mohamed
    Agiza, H. N.
    INTELLIGENT AUTOMATION AND SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 32 (03): : 1893 - 1904
  • [2] Comparison of NSGA-III with NSGA-II for multi objective optimization of adiabatic styrene reactor
    Chaudhari, Pranava
    Thakur, Amit K.
    Kumar, Rahul
    Banerjee, Nilanjana
    Kumar, Amit
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 57 : 1509 - 1514
  • [3] A Comparative Analysis of NSGA-II and NSGA-III for Autoscaling Parameter Sweep Experiments in the Cloud
    Yannibelli, Virginia
    Pacini, Elina
    Monge, David
    Mateos, Cristian
    Rodriguez, Guillermo
    SCIENTIFIC PROGRAMMING, 2020, 2020
  • [4] NSGA-II vs NSGA-III for the Sustainable Multi-Objective Process Plan Generation in a Reconfigurable Manufacturing Environment
    Khettabi, I
    Boutiche, M. A.
    Benyoucef, L.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2021, 54 (01): : 683 - 688
  • [5] A NSGA-II and NSGA-III comparison for solving an open shop scheduling problem with resource constraints
    Ciro, Guillermo Campos
    Dugardin, Frederic
    Yalaoui, Farouk
    Kelly, Russell
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2016, 49 (12): : 1272 - 1277
  • [6] Performance Comparison of NSGA-II and NSGA-III on Various Many-Objective Test Problems
    Ishibuchi, Hisao
    Imada, Ryo
    Setoguchi, Yu
    Nojima, Yusuke
    2016 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION (CEC), 2016, : 3045 - 3052
  • [7] Performance Comparison of NSGA-II and NSGA-III on Bi-objective Job Shop Scheduling Problems
    dos Santos, Francisco
    Costa, Lino A.
    Varela, Leonilde
    OPTIMIZATION, LEARNING ALGORITHMS AND APPLICATIONS, PT I, OL2A 2023, 2024, 1981 : 531 - 543
  • [8] Sustainable multi-objective process planning in reconfigurable manufacturing environment: adapted new dynamic NSGA-II vs New NSGA-III
    Khettabi, Imen
    Benyoucef, Lyes
    Boutiche, Mohamed Amine
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2022, 60 (20) : 6329 - 6349
  • [9] A multi-objective selective maintenance optimization method for series-parallel systems using NSGA-III and NSGA-II evolutionary algorithms
    Xu, E. B.
    Yang, M. S.
    Li, Y.
    Gao, X. Q.
    Wang, Z. Y.
    Ren, L. J.
    ADVANCES IN PRODUCTION ENGINEERING & MANAGEMENT, 2021, 16 (03): : 372 - 384
  • [10] A comparative analysis of "controlled elitism" in the NSGA-II applied to frame optimization
    Greiner, D
    Winter, G
    Emperador, JM
    Galván, B
    IUTAM SYMPOSIUM ON EVOLUTIONARY METHODS IN MECHANICS, 2004, 117 : 101 - 110