Monogamy of k-entanglement

被引:1
|
作者
Guo, Yu [1 ]
机构
[1] Inner Mongolia Univ, Sch Math Sci, Hohhot 010021, Inner Mongolia, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Compendex;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.110.012405
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
Multipartite entanglement includes not only the genuine entanglement but also the k-entanglement (k ? 2). It is known that the most bipartite entanglement measures have been shown to be monogamous, but the monogamy relation is involved in the bipartite entanglement measures rather than the multipartite ones. So how we can explore the monogamy relation for k-entanglement becomes a basic open problem. In this paper we establish an axiomatic definition of the monogamy relation for the k-entanglement measure based on the coarser relation of the system partition. We also present the axiomatic definition of the complete k-entanglement measure and the associated complete monogamy relation according to the framework of the complete multipartite entanglement measure we established in [Phys. Rev. A 101, 032301 (2020)], which is shown to be an efficient tool for characterizing the multipartite quantum correlation as complementary to the monogamy relation associated with the bipartite measure. Consequently, the relation and the difference between monogamy, complete monogamy, and tightly complete monogamy are clearly depicted in light of the three types of coarser relation of the system partition. We then illustrate our approach with two classes of k-entanglement measures in detail. We find that all these k-entanglement measures are monogamous if the reduced function is strictly concave, they are not completely monogamous, and they are not complete generally.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluating the robustness of k-coherence and k-entanglement
    Johnston, Nathaniel
    Li, Chi-Kwong
    Plosker, Sarah
    Poon, Yiu-Tung
    Regula, Bartosz
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2018, 98 (02)
  • [2] Mapping cone of k-entanglement breaking maps
    Devendra, Repana
    Mallick, Nirupama
    Sumesh, K.
    POSITIVITY, 2023, 27 (01)
  • [3] Mapping cone of k-entanglement breaking maps
    Repana Devendra
    Nirupama Mallick
    K. Sumesh
    Positivity, 2023, 27
  • [4] Monogamy of correlations versus monogamy of entanglement
    Seevinck, M. P.
    QUANTUM INFORMATION PROCESSING, 2010, 9 (02) : 273 - 294
  • [5] Monogamy of correlations versus monogamy of entanglement
    M. P. Seevinck
    Quantum Information Processing, 2010, 9 : 273 - 294
  • [6] Monogamy of entanglement of formation
    de Oliveira, Thiago R.
    Cornelio, Marcio F.
    Fanchini, Felipe F.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2014, 89 (03):
  • [7] Monogamy of Quantum Entanglement
    Zong, Xiao-Lan
    Yin, Hao-Hao
    Song, Wei
    Cao, Zhuo-Liang
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2022, 10
  • [8] Monogamy of the entanglement of formation
    Guo, Yu
    Gour, Gilad
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2019, 99 (04)
  • [9] Entanglement monogamy and entanglement evolution in multipartite systems
    Bai, Yan-Kui
    Ye, Ming-Yong
    Wang, Z. D.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2009, 80 (04):
  • [10] Dual monogamy inequality for entanglement
    Gour, Gilad
    Bandyopadhyay, Somshubhro
    Sanders, Barry C.
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 48 (01)