A roadmap for model-based bioprocess development

被引:2
|
作者
Mu'azzam, Khadija [1 ,2 ]
da Silva, Francisco Vitor Santos [1 ]
Murtagh, Jason [2 ]
Gallagher, Maria Jose Sousa [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coll Cork, Sch Engn & Architecture, Proc & Chem Engn, Cork, Ireland
[2] DPS Grp Cork, Arcadis, Netherlands
关键词
Quality by design; Design space; Industry; 4.0; 5.0; Digital twins; Process modelling; Process simulation; Biopharmaceutical manufacturing; DIGITAL TWINS; BIG DATA; OPPORTUNITIES; QUALITY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.biotechadv.2024.108378
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The bioprocessing industry is undergoing a significant transformation in its approach to quality assurance, shifting from the traditional Quality by Testing (QbT) to Quality by Design (QbD). QbD, a systematic approach to quality in process development, integrates quality into process design and control, guided by regulatory frameworks. This paradigm shift enables increased operational efficiencies, reduced market time, and ensures product consistency. The implementation of QbD is framed around key elements such as defining the Quality Target Product Profile (QTPPs), identifying Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs), developing Design Spaces (DS), establishing Control Strategies (CS), and maintaining continual improvement. The present critical analysis delves into the intricacies of each element, emphasizing their role in ensuring consistent product quality and regulatory compliance. The integration of Industry 4.0 and 5.0 technologies, including Artificial Intelligence (AI), Machine Learning (ML), Internet of Things (IoT), and Digital Twins (DTs), is significantly transforming the bioprocessing industry. These innovations enable real-time data analysis, predictive modelling, and process optimization, which are crucial elements in QbD implementation. Among these, the concept of DTs is notable for its ability to facilitate bidirectional data communication and enable real-time adjustments and therefore optimize processes. DTs, however, face implementation challenges such as system integration, data security, and hardware -software compatibility. These challenges are being addressed through advancements in AI, Virtual Reality/ Augmented Reality (VR/AR), and improved communication technologies. Central to the functioning of DTs is the development and application of various models of differing types - mechanistic, empirical, and hybrid. These models serve as the intellectual backbone of DTs, providing a framework for interpreting and predicting the behaviour of their physical counterparts. The choice and development of these models are vital for the accuracy and efficacy of DTs, enabling them to mirror and predict the real-time dynamics of bioprocessing systems. Complementing these models, advancements in data collection technologies, such as free-floating wireless sensors and spectroscopic sensors, enhance the monitoring and control capabilities of DTs, providing a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the bioprocessing environment. This review offers a critical analysis of the prevailing trends in model -based bioprocessing development within the sector.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-throughput strategies for model-based bioprocess development
    Cai L.
    Kemmer A.
    Krausch N.
    Neubauer P.
    Bournazou M.N.C.
    BIOspektrum, 2024, 30 (2) : 177 - 179
  • [2] BIOPROCESS APPLICATIONS OF MODEL-BASED ESTIMATION TECHNIQUES
    DIMASSIMO, C
    LANT, PA
    SAUNDERS, A
    MONTAGUE, GA
    THAM, MT
    MORRIS, AJ
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1992, 53 (03) : 265 - 277
  • [3] YOLOx model-based object detection for microalgal bioprocess
    Yan, Huchao
    Peng, Xinggan
    Chen, Cheng
    Xia, Ao
    Huang, Yun
    Zhu, Xianqing
    Zhu, Xun
    Liao, Qiang
    ALGAL RESEARCH-BIOMASS BIOFUELS AND BIOPRODUCTS, 2023, 74
  • [4] Model-based tools for optimal experiments in bioprocess engineering
    Abt, Vinzenz
    Barz, Tilman
    Cruz-Bournazou, Mariano Nicolas
    Herwig, Christoph
    Kroll, Paul
    Moeller, Johannes
    Poertner, Ralf
    Schenkendorf, Rene
    CURRENT OPINION IN CHEMICAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 22 : 244 - 252
  • [5] Model-based development
    Robert France
    Bernhard Rumpe
    Software & Systems Modeling, 2008, 7 : 1 - 2
  • [6] Model-based development
    France, Robert
    Rumpe, Bernhard
    SOFTWARE AND SYSTEMS MODELING, 2008, 7 (01): : 1 - 2
  • [7] Comparison of strategies for iterative model-based upstream bioprocess development with single and parallel reactor set-ups
    De Luca, Riccardo
    Costa, Goncalo
    Narayanan, Harini
    Wirnsperger, Claus
    Bournazou, Mariano N. Cruz
    Butte, Alessandro
    von Stosch, Moritz
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2023, 191
  • [8] Model-based operational optimisation of a microbial bioprocess converting terephthalic acid to biomass
    Beagan, Niall
    O'Connor, Kevin E.
    Del Val, Ioscani Jimenez
    BIOCHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2020, 158
  • [9] Distributed Computing and Model-Based Estimation for Integrated Communications and Sensing: A Roadmap
    Semper, Sebastian
    Naviliat, Joeel
    Gedschold, Jonas
    Doebereiner, Michael
    Schieler, Steffen
    Thomae, Reiner S.
    IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF THE COMMUNICATIONS SOCIETY, 2024, 5 : 6279 - 6290
  • [10] Consistency in model-based development
    Schätz, B
    Braun, P
    Huber, F
    Wisspeintner, A
    ECBS 2003: 10TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND WORKSHOP ON THE ENGINEERING OF COMPUTER-BASED SYSTEMS, PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 287 - 296