WiCo: Win-win Cooperation of Bottom-up and Top-down Referring Image Segmentation

被引:0
|
作者
Cheng, Zesen [1 ,2 ]
Jin, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Li, Hao [1 ,2 ]
Li, Kehan [1 ,2 ]
Li, Siheng [4 ]
Ji, Xiangyang [4 ]
Liu, Chang [4 ]
Chen, Jie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch Elect & Comp Engn, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, AI Sci AI4S Preferred Program, Shenzhen Grad Sch, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peng Cheng Lab, Shenzhen, Peoples R China
[4] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The top-down and bottom-up methods are two mainstreams of referring segmentation, while both methods have their own intrinsic weaknesses. Top-down methods are chiefly disturbed by Polar Negative (PN) errors owing to the lack of fine-grained cross-modal alignment. Bottom-up methods are mainly perturbed by Inferior Positive (IP) errors due to the lack of prior object information. Nevertheless, we discover that two types of methods are highly complementary for restraining respective weaknesses but the direct average combination leads to harmful interference. In this context, we buildWin-win Cooperation (WiCo) to exploit complementary nature of two types of methods on both interaction and integration aspects for achieving a win-win improvement. For the interaction aspect, Complementary Feature Interaction (CFI) provides fine-grained information to top-down branch and introduces prior object information to bottom-up branch for complementary feature enhancement. For the integration aspect, Gaussian Scoring Integration (GSI) models the gaussian performance distributions of two branches and weighted integrates results by sampling confident scores from the distributions. With our WiCo, several prominent top-down and bottom-up combinations achieve remarkable improvements on three common datasets with reasonable extra costs, which justifies effectiveness and generality of our method.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 644
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Bottom-up Segmentation for Top-down Detection
    Fidler, Sanja
    Mottaghi, Roozbeh
    Yuille, Alan
    Urtasun, Raquel
    2013 IEEE CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR), 2013, : 3294 - 3301
  • [2] Combined Top-Down/Bottom-Up Segmentation
    Borenstein, Eran
    Ullman, Shimon
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2008, 30 (12) : 2109 - 2125
  • [3] Top-down and bottom-up image processing
    Stark, LW
    Privitera, C
    1997 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEURAL NETWORKS, VOLS 1-4, 1997, : 2294 - 2299
  • [4] Learning to Combine Bottom-Up and Top-Down Segmentation
    Levin, Anat
    Weiss, Yair
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER VISION, 2009, 81 (01) : 105 - 118
  • [5] Learning to combine bottom-up and top-down segmentation
    Levin, Anat
    Weiss, Yair
    COMPUTER VISION - ECCV 2006, PT 4, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 3954 : 581 - 594
  • [6] Learning to Combine Bottom-Up and Top-Down Segmentation
    Anat Levin
    Yair Weiss
    International Journal of Computer Vision, 2009, 81 : 105 - 118
  • [7] Cooperation between top-down and bottom-up theorem provers
    Fuchs, D
    Fuchs, M
    JOURNAL OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE RESEARCH, 1999, 10 : 169 - 198
  • [8] Cooperation between top-down and bottom-up theorem provers
    Fuchs, Dirk
    Fuchs, Marc
    Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 10 : 169 - 198
  • [9] BlendMask: Top-Down Meets Bottom-Up for Instance Segmentation
    Chen, Hao
    Sun, Kunyang
    Tian, Zhi
    Shen, Chunhua
    Huang, Yongming
    Yan, Youliang
    2020 IEEE/CVF CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION (CVPR 2020), 2020, : 8570 - 8578
  • [10] Bottom-up or top-down in dream neuroscience? A top-down critique of two bottom-up studies
    Foulkes, David
    Domhoff, G. William
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2014, 27 : 168 - 171