Human Reliability Analysis for Fishing Vessels in Korea Using Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM)

被引:2
|
作者
Lee, Donghun [1 ]
Kim, Hyungju [1 ]
Koo, Kwiyeon [2 ]
Kwon, Sooyeon [3 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech & Ind Engn, N-7034 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Univ South Eastern Norway, Dept Microsyst, N-3184 Borre, Norway
[3] Korea Maritime Transportat Safety Author, Dept Fishing Vessel Safety Res, Sejong Si 30100, South Korea
关键词
human reliability analysis; CREAM; fishing boats; human error probability; cognitive failure probability; WEATHER CONDITIONS; FUZZY; MODEL; QUANTIFICATION; INCIDENTS; MARINE;
D O I
10.3390/su16093780
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this paper, we introduce a model designed to predict human error probability (HEP) in the context of fishing boat operations utilizing the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). We conducted an analysis of potential accidents on fishing boats and calculated the cognitive failure probability (CFP) for each identified accident. The common performance conditions (CPCs) from the original CREAM were adapted to better reflect the conditions on fishing boats, with the adapted CPCs' validity confirmed through expert consultations. To apply CREAM, data were gathered via a survey of fishermen, with the uncertainty in the collected data addressed through the application of fuzzy set theory (FST). We then established a Bayesian network (BN) model to elucidate the relationship between the fuzzy data and HEP, utilizing a weighted sum algorithm to determine conditional probabilities within the BN. Both basic and extended versions of CREAM were applied to analyze the most common accidents among fishermen, calculating the CFP for each type of accident. According to our analysis, the poorer the dynamic CPC, the higher the probability that a fall accident will occur inside the boat due to human error, necessitating a countermeasure. The paper proposes safety enhancements for small fishing boats and illustrates the increased precision of human reliability analysis (HRA) models in forecasting human error by incorporating quantitative methods. It calls for further data collection and refinement of the model for more accurate operational risk assessments.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitative developments in the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) for the assessment of human performance
    Marseguerra, Marzio
    Zio, Enrico
    Librizzi, Massimo
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2006, 33 (10) : 894 - 910
  • [2] The Support for using the Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM) for Marine Accident Investigation
    Yoshimura, Kenji
    Takemoto, Takahiro
    Mitomo, Nobuo
    2015 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATICS, ELECTRONICS & VISION ICIEV 15, 2015,
  • [3] Investigating human error in Iran's copper mines using the CREAM based on human cognitive reliability analysis
    Taheri, Mohammad Reza
    Mortazavi, Seyed Bagher
    Asilian, Hasan
    Ahmadi, Omran
    Sogandi, Fatemeh
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND ERGONOMICS, 2022, : 1423 - 1428
  • [4] Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Method (CREAM) at the International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor (ITER)
    Vladykina, Svetlana
    Thurner, Thomas Wolfgang
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 35 (06) : 1621 - 1633
  • [5] The synthesis of human-error analysis using the cognitive reliability and error analysis method and fault-tree analysis
    Zupancic, J
    Marn, J
    STROJNISKI VESTNIK-JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, 2002, 48 (08): : 418 - 437
  • [6] Comparison of Standardized Plant Analysis Risk Human Reliability Analysis (SPAR-H) and Cognitive Reliability Error Analysis Methods (CREAM) in Quantifying Human Error in Nursing Practice
    Mohammadfam, Iraj
    Movafagh, Maryam
    Bashirian, Saeid
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 45 (03) : 401 - 402
  • [7] A method of human reliability analysis and quantification for space missions based on a Bayesian network and the cognitive reliability and error analysis method
    Chen, Jiayu
    Zhou, Dong
    Lyu, Chuan
    Zhu, Xinv
    QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 34 (05) : 912 - 927
  • [8] Human reliability analysis by fuzzy "CREAM"
    Marseguerra, Marzio
    Zio, Enrico
    Librizzi, Massimo
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (01) : 137 - 154
  • [9] The Mechanism of how Design Failures cause Unsafe Behavior: The Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM)
    Liao, Pin-Chao
    Luo, Xintong
    Wang, Tao
    Su, Yusong
    ICSDEC 2016 - INTEGRATING DATA SCIENCE, CONSTRUCTION AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 145 : 715 - 722
  • [10] Screening, sensitivity, and uncertainty for the CREAM method of Human Reliability Analysis
    Bedford, Tim
    Bayley, Clare
    Revie, Matthew
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2013, 115 : 100 - 110