Exoskeleton System for Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology

被引:0
|
作者
Hosse, Clarissa [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kolck, Johannes [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Can, Elif [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Fehrenbach, Uli [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Auer, Timo A. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Pivetta, Fabio [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Collettini, Federico [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Gebauer, Bernhard [1 ,2 ,3 ]
de Bucourt, Maximilian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Charite Berlin Univ Med, Inst Radiol, Charite Univ Med Berlin, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[2] Freie Univ, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Charitepl 1, D-10117 Berlin, Germany
[4] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Berlin Inst Hlth, Berlin, Germany
[5] Albert Ludwigs Univ Freiburg, Inst Radiol, Freiburg, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF RADIATION PROTECTION AND RESEARCH | 2024年 / 49卷 / 02期
关键词
Radiation Protection; Interventional Radiology; Radiation Safety; PHYSICIANS; EXPOSURE; PAIN;
D O I
10.14407/jrpr.2023.00745
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Background: As the quantity and complexity of radiological interventions are constantly increasing, gear that offers optimal protection while maintaining mobility and a low weight burden is becoming more important. A newly developed exoskeleton radiation protection system (ERPS) (StemRad MD; StemRad Ltd.) can carry the weight of the shielding. The aim of our study was to analyze initial experience, especially in terms of advantages and disadvantages, with this new ERPS in interventional radiology. Materials and Methods: Forty-six interventions utilizing the ERPS were analyzed. The interventional radiologists completed a 15-question survey evaluating various aspects of the protective system, including weight, mobility, comfort, and radiation protection adequacy. Results and Discussion: In 98% of procedures, interventionalists reported being very satisfied (89%) or slightly satisfied (9%) and would recommend the system to colleagues. The exoskeleton system was rated as 100% comfortable, not too heavy, and did not restrict mobility in 98% of cases. Conclusion: The ERPS is a recommendable alternative to standard lead aprons, providing flexibility, comfort, and effective weight distribution without restricting mobility.
引用
收藏
页码:78 / 84
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiation protection in interventional radiology
    Johnson, DR
    Kyriou, J
    Morton, EJ
    Clifton, A
    Fitzgerald, M
    MacSweeney, E
    CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2001, 56 (02) : 99 - 106
  • [2] Radiation protection in interventional radiology
    Faulkner, K
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 1997, 70 (832): : 325 - 326
  • [3] Radiation Protection in Interventional Radiology
    Garg, Tushar
    Shrigiriwar, Apurva
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING, 2021, 31 (04): : 939 - 945
  • [4] Radiation protection in interventional radiology.
    Adamus, R.
    Loose, R.
    Wucherer, M.
    Uder, M.
    Galster, M.
    RADIOLOGE, 2016, 56 (03): : 275 - 281
  • [5] Radiation Protection Tools in Interventional Radiology
    Schueler, Beth A.
    Baiter, Stephen
    Miller, Donald L.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 9 (11) : 844 - 845
  • [6] Radiation Protection and Safety in Interventional Radiology
    Wagner, Jessyca B.
    RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 91 (05) : 431 - 444
  • [7] Effectiveness of a new radiation protection system in the interventional radiology setting
    Etzel, Robin
    Koenig, Alexander M.
    Keil, Boris
    Fiebich, Martin
    Mahnken, Andreas H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 106 : 56 - 61
  • [8] Radiation protection of patients in interventional radiology
    Roche, A.
    JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2010, 91 (11): : 1231 - 1235
  • [9] Efficiency in radiation protection of a novel exoskeleton-based interventional radiology apron and correlation with conventional aprons
    Apostolou, A.
    Leichert, H. J.
    Koenig, A. M.
    Owczarek, A. D.
    Mahnken, A. H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2025, 184
  • [10] Training and accreditation in radiation protection for interventional radiology
    Vañó, E
    Gonzalez, L
    Faulkner, K
    Padovani, R
    Malone, JF
    DOSE AND IMAGE QUALITY IN DIGITAL IMAGING AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY (DIMOND), 2001, : 137 - 142