Establishing a model predicting Gleason grade group upgrading in prostate cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Chen, Jian [1 ]
Chen, Qiming [1 ]
Wang, Ze [1 ]
Yan, Xuzhi [1 ]
Wang, Yapeng [1 ]
Zhang, Yao [1 ]
Zhang, Jun [1 ]
Xu, Jing [1 ]
Ma, Qiang [2 ]
Zhong, Peng [2 ]
Zhang, Dianzheng [3 ]
Liu, Qiuli [1 ]
Lan, Weihua [1 ]
Jiang, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Army Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Inst Surg Res, Dept Urol, 10 Changjiangzhilu, Chongqing 400042, Peoples R China
[2] Army Med Univ, Daping Hosp, Inst Surg Res, Dept Pathol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Philadelphia Coll Osteopath Med, Dept Biomed Sci, Philadelphia, PA USA
关键词
Prostate cancer (PCa); Gleason grade group upgrading; systemic immune-inflammation index (SII); prediction model; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ACTIVE SURVEILLANCE; LYMPHOCYTE RATIO; SCORE; BIOPSY; RISK; CANDIDATE;
D O I
10.21037/tau-24-155
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Gleason grade group (GG) upgrading is associated with increased biochemical recurrence (BCR), local progression, and decreased cancer-specific survival (CSS) in prostate cancer (PCa). However, descriptions of the risk factors of GG upgrading are scarce. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors and establish a model to predict GG upgrading. Methods: There were 361 patients with PCa who underwent radical prostatectomy between May 2011 and February 2022 enrolled. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were identified and nomogram further narrowed down the contributing factors in GG upgrading. The correction curve and decision curve were used to assess the model. Results: In the overall cohort, 141 patients had GG upgrading. But the subgroup cohort (GG <= 2) showed that 68 patients had GG upgrading. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that in the overall cohort, total prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) >= 10 ng/mL, systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) >379.50, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) >2.13, the GG of biopsy >= 3, the number of positive cores >3 were independent risk factors in GG upgrading. In the cohort of biopsy GG <= 2, multivariate logistic regression showed that the tPSA >= 10 ng/mL, SII >379.50 and the number of positive cores >3 were independent risk factors in GG upgrading. A novel model predicting GG upgrading was established based on these three parameters. The area under the curve (AUC) of the prediction model was 0.759. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.768. The calibration curves of the model showed good predictive performance. Clinical decision curves indicated clinical benefit in the interval of 20% to 90% of threshold probability and good clinical utility. Conclusions: Combined levels of tPSA, SII and the positive biopsy cores distinguish patients with high-risk GG upgrading in the group of biopsy GG <= 2 and are helpful in the decision of treatment plans.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictors of Gleason score upgrading in patients with a biopsy diagnosis of grade group 1 prostate cancer
    Esen, Baris
    Gurses, Bengi
    Ozkan, Arif
    Kilic, Mert
    Kordan, Yakup
    Esen, Tarik
    Baydar, Dilek E. R. T. O. Y.
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2025, 55 (01)
  • [2] UPGRADE score: a new scoring system in predicting pathological upgrading after prostatectomy in patients with Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer
    Karamik, Kaan
    Anil, Hakan
    Yildiz, Ali
    Guezel, Ahmet
    Akdemir, Serkan
    Arslan, Murat
    JOURNAL OF MENS HEALTH, 2024, 20 (10) : 111 - 116
  • [3] Upgrading Gleason score 7 and tertiary grade 5 prostate cancer is warranted
    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology, 2008, 5 (2): : 69 - 69
  • [4] Predicting Prostate Cancer Upgrading of Biopsy Gleason Grade Group at Radical Prostatectomy Using Machine Learning-Assisted Decision-Support Models
    Liu, Hailang
    Tang, Kun
    Peng, Ejun
    Wang, Liang
    Xia, Ding
    Chen, Zhiqiang
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 13099 - 13110
  • [5] Factors predicting pathological upgrading after prostatectomy in patients with Gleason grade group 1 prostate cancer based on opinion-matched biopsy specimens
    Maruyama, Yuki
    Sadahira, Takuya
    Araki, Motoo
    Mitsui, Yosuke
    Wada, Koichiro
    Rodrigo, Acosta Gonzalez Herik
    Munetomo, Kazuaki
    Kobayashi, Yasuyuki
    Watanabe, Masami
    Yanai, Hiroyuki
    Watanabe, Toyohiko
    Nasu, Yasutomo
    MOLECULAR AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 12 (04) : 384 - 389
  • [6] Transcriptomic Heterogeneity of Gleason Grade Group 5 Prostate Cancer
    Kishan, Amar U.
    Romero, Tahmineh
    Alshalalfa, Mohammed
    Liu, Yang
    Tran, Phuoc T.
    Nickols, Nicholas G.
    Ye, Huihui
    Sajed, Dipti
    Rettig, Matthew B.
    Reiter, Robert E.
    Garraway, Isla P.
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Freedland, Steven J.
    Zhao, Xin
    Li, Ziwen
    Deek, Matthew
    Livingstone, Julie
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Den, Robert B.
    Schaeffer, Edward M.
    Lotan, Tamara L.
    Karnes, R. Jeffrey
    Klein, Eric A.
    Ross, Ashley E.
    Grogan, Tristan
    Davicioni, Elai
    Elashoff, David
    Boutros, Paul C.
    Weidhaas, Joanne B.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2020, 78 (03) : 327 - 332
  • [7] Consistency of prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason grade groups and nomograms for predicting upgrading and downgrading
    Yan, H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 26 : 42 - 42
  • [8] GLEASON GRADE GROUP 1 PROSTATE CANCER VOLUME AT BIOPSY IS ASSOCIATED WITH UNFAVORABLE PATHOLOGY BUT NOT UPGRADING AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY
    Kim, Tae Heon
    Hwang, Tae Ho
    Yu, Young Dong
    Lee, Seung Ryeol
    Hong, Young Kwon
    Park, Dong Soo
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E951 - E951
  • [9] Upgrading prostate cancer patients with a Gleason score of 7 and tertiary grade 5 is warranted
    Nature Clinical Practice Urology, 2008, 5 (2): : 62 - 62
  • [10] Pelvic nodal radiotherapy in Gleason grade group 5 prostate cancer
    Cook, Kiri
    Kishan, Amar U.
    TRANSLATIONAL ANDROLOGY AND UROLOGY, 2020, 9 (05) : 2326 - 2328