The Structure of Identity Dysfunction in Self-Report Measures

被引:2
|
作者
Nielsen, Sienna R. [1 ]
Wright, Aidan G. C. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Psychol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Eisenberg Family Depress Ctr, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
关键词
BORDERLINE-PERSONALITY-DISORDER; MCLEAN SCREENING INSTRUMENT; INTERPERSONAL PROBLEMS; INCREMENTAL VALIDITY; EMOTION REGULATION; CIRCUMPLEX SCALES; VALIDATION; DISTURBANCE; CONSTRUCTION; RELIABILITY;
D O I
10.1080/00223891.2024.2362982
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Identity dysfunction is considered core to psychopathology, contributing to emotional and interpersonal problems across psychiatric diagnoses. Despite its centrality in theories of personality and psychopathology, the empirical research on the structure of identity dysfunction is fragmented by a plethora of self-report measures assessing varied domains of identity dysfunction. This project examines conceptual domains of identity dysfunction in self-report assessments, with the goal of elucidating a clear structure of identity dysfunction to advance both theory and measurement. Toward this aim, we a) investigate the factor structure of identity dysfunction in existing self-report measures, using exploratory factor analysis and b) examine relationships between identity dysfunction and closely related constructs, using exploratory structural equation modeling. We assess responses from 632 young adults to 17 commonly used identity functioning self-report measures. In a series of exploratory factor analyses, we identified four content-domains of Identity Dysfunction (Self-Alienation, Susceptibility to External Influence, Self-Dysregulation, and Contingent Self-Esteem) and three content domains of Identity Clarity (Self-Consistency, Reflective Functioning, and Authentic Living). These content domains were largely well-represented by a single factor. In a series of exploratory structural equation models, emergent factors related similarly to personality, emotion dysregulation, and values and problems in interpersonal relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 27
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Uncovering the structure of agreeableness from self-report measures
    Crowe, Michael L.
    Lynam, Donald R.
    Miller, Joshua D.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY, 2018, 86 (05) : 771 - 787
  • [2] Self-report Measures of Mobility
    Andrews, A. Williams
    TOPICS IN GERIATRIC REHABILITATION, 2012, 28 (01) : 2 - 10
  • [3] Assessing the component structure of four self-report measures of impulsivity
    Miller, E
    Joseph, S
    Tudway, J
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2004, 37 (02) : 349 - 358
  • [4] Self-Report Measures of Physical Activity
    Healey, Emma L.
    Allen, Kelli D.
    Bennell, Kim
    Bowden, Jocelyn L.
    Quicke, Jonathan G.
    Smith, Robert
    ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2020, 72 : 717 - 730
  • [5] SELF-REPORT MEASURES OF FAMILY COMPETENCE
    GREEN, RG
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF FAMILY THERAPY, 1987, 15 (02): : 163 - 168
  • [6] READABILITY OF DIABETES SELF-REPORT MEASURES
    WYSOCKI, T
    TARNOWSKI, KJ
    ALLEN, DM
    DIABETES CARE, 1989, 12 (10) : 752 - 753
  • [7] Validity of self-report and observation measures
    Jensen, MP
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 8TH WORLD CONGRESS ON PAIN, 1997, 8 : 637 - 661
  • [8] Self-report measures in athletic preparation
    Saw, Anna E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2017, 51 (18) : 1377 - 1378
  • [9] Depression: The complexity of self-report measures
    Endler, NS
    Macrodimitris, SD
    Kocovski, NL
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BIOBEHAVIORAL RESEARCH, 2000, 5 (01) : 26 - 46
  • [10] Can People Self-Report Security Accurately? Agreement Between Self-Report and Behavioral Measures
    Wash, Rick
    Rader, Emilee
    Fennell, Chris
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 ACM SIGCHI CONFERENCE ON HUMAN FACTORS IN COMPUTING SYSTEMS (CHI'17), 2017, : 2228 - 2232