Application of uncertainty quantification techniques in the framework of process safety studies: Advanced dispersion simulations

被引:0
|
作者
Bellegoni, Marco [1 ]
Marroni, Giulia [1 ]
Mariotti, Alessandro [1 ]
Salvetti, Maria Vittoria [1 ]
Landucci, Gabriele [1 ]
Galletti, Chiara [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pisa, Dept Civil & Ind Engn, Pisa, Italy
来源
关键词
computational fluid dynamics; gas dispersion; process safety; uncertainty quantification; RISK-ASSESSMENT; GAS DISPERSION; URBAN-ENVIRONMENT; CFD; REPRESENTATION; PROPAGATION;
D O I
10.1002/cjce.25410
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
In the framework of process safety studies, consequence assessment of accidental scenarios is a crucial step affecting the eventual risk profile associated with the facilities under analysis. Conventional models used for consequence assessment are based on integral models, and may not be adequate to cope with the dynamic evolution of accidental scenarios and their three-dimensional features. On the other hand, consequence assessment models based on computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approaches are promising to cope with complex scenarios and environments, but setting the simulation introduces relevant uncertainties associated with both the input data, assumptions, and with the modelling of physical effects involved. In the present study, uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques are applied to support advanced safety studies based on CFD simulations of hazardous gas dispersion. Firstly, the accidental scenarios are characterized by defining release scenarios and conditions and quantifying source terms using integral models. At the same time, input meteorological data are gathered. This enables the development of high-fidelity CFD simulations of gas dispersion based on different input sets and eventually the implementation of UQ techniques. The generalized polynomial chaos (gPC) expansion is employed to obtain hazardous gas concentration based on the variation of wind direction and speed. The present method is applied for the analysis of a real plant featuring a complex layout. The results show the advantages of the present approach by quantifying the influence of meteorological conditions and providing indications for supporting the development of protection systems and emergency measures.
引用
收藏
页码:4072 / 4084
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] An overview of uncertainty quantification techniques with application to oceanic and oil-spill simulations
    Iskandarani, Mohamed
    Wang, Shitao
    Srinivasan, Ashwanth
    Thacker, W. Carlisle
    Winokur, Justin
    Knio, Omar M.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, 2016, 121 (04) : 2789 - 2808
  • [2] Combining simulations and data with deep learning and uncertainty quantification for advanced energy modeling
    Radaideh, Majdi I.
    Kozlowski, Tomasz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2019, 43 (14) : 7866 - 7890
  • [3] Batch simulations and uncertainty quantification in Gaussian process surrogate approximate Bayesian computation
    Jarvenpaa, Marko
    Vehtari, Aki
    Marttinen, Pekka
    CONFERENCE ON UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (UAI 2020), 2020, 124 : 779 - 788
  • [4] APPLICATION OF NOISE FILTERING TECHNIQUES FOR THE QUANTIFICATION OF UNCERTAINTY IN DENT STRAIN CALCULATIONS
    Ergezinger, Noah
    Virk, Amandeep Singh
    Woo, Janine
    Kainat, Muntaseer
    Adeeb, Samer
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME 2020 13TH INTERNATIONAL PIPELINE CONFERENCE (IPC2020), VOL 1, 2020,
  • [5] Bayesian uncertainty quantification and propagation in molecular dynamics simulations: A high performance computing framework
    Angelikopoulos, Panagiotis
    Papadimitriou, Costas
    Koumoutsakos, Petros
    JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 137 (14):
  • [6] Prediction using numerical simulations, a Bayesian framework for uncertainty quantification and its statistical challenge
    Glimm, J
    Lee, Y
    Ye, KQ
    Sharp, DH
    ISUMA 2003: FOURTH INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON UNCERTAINTY MODELING AND ANALYSIS, 2003, : 380 - 385
  • [7] Uncertainty quantification on advanced fuel cycle scenario simulations applying local and global methods
    Skarbeli, A. V.
    Alvarez-Velarde, F.
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 124 : 349 - 356
  • [8] Techniques for effective simulation, optimization, and uncertainty quantification of the in-situ upgrading process
    Alpak, Faruk O.
    Vink, Jeroen C.
    Gao, Guohua
    Mo, Weijian
    JOURNAL OF UNCONVENTIONAL OIL AND GAS RESOURCES, 2013, 3-4 (3-4) : 1 - 14
  • [9] A Bayesian framework for uncertainty quantification of perturbed gamma process based on simulated likelihood
    Chen, Long
    Huang, Tianli
    Zhou, Hao
    Chen, Huapeng
    PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2023, 72
  • [10] Application of a Verification, Validation and Uncertainty Quantification Framework to a Turbulent Buoyant Helium Plume
    Anchal Jatale
    Philip J. Smith
    Jeremy N. Thornock
    Sean T. Smith
    Jennifer P. Spinti
    Michal Hradisky
    Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 2015, 95 : 143 - 168