Model Forecasting of Hydrogen Yield and Lower Heating Value in Waste Mahua Wood Gasification with Machine Learning

被引:2
|
作者
Paramasivam, Prabhu [1 ,2 ]
Alruqi, Mansoor [3 ,4 ]
Hanafi, H. A. [4 ,5 ,6 ]
Sharma, P. [7 ]
机构
[1] SIMATS, Saveetha Sch Engn, Dept Res & Innovat, Chennai 602105, Tamil Nadu, India
[2] Mattu Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Mettu 318, Ethiopia
[3] Shaqra Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Shaqra 11911, Saudi Arabia
[4] Shaqra Univ, Coll Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Energy & Mat Res Grp, Shaqra 11911, Saudi Arabia
[5] Shaqra Univ, Coll Sci & Humanities, Chem Dept, Shaqra 11911, Saudi Arabia
[6] Egyptian Atom Energy Author, Nucl Res Ctr, Cyclotron Project, Cairo 13759, Egypt
[7] Delhi Skill & Entrepreneurship Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Delhi, India
关键词
BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1155/2024/1635337
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Biomass is an excellent source of green energy with numerous benefits such as abundant availability, net carbon zero, and renewable nature. However, the conventional methods of biomass combustion are polluting and poor efficiency processes. Biomass gasification overcomes these challenges and provides a sustainable method for the supply of greener fuel in the form of producer gas. The producer gas can be employed as a gaseous fuel in compression ignition engines in dual-fuel systems. The biomass gasification process is a complex as well as a nonlinear process that is highly dependent on the ambient environment, type of biomass, and biomass composition as well as the gasification medium. This makes the modeling of such systems quite difficult and time-consuming. Modern machine learning (ML) techniques offer the use of experimental data as a convenient approach to modeling and forecasting such systems. In the present study, two modern and highly efficient ML techniques, random forest (RF) and AdaBoost, were employed for this purpose. The outcomes were employed with results of a baseline method, i.e., linear regression. The RF could forecast the hydrogen yield with R2 as 0.978 during model training and 0.998 during the model test phase. AdaBoost ML was close behind with R2 at 0.948 during model training and 0.842 during the model test phase. The mean squared error was as low as 0.17 and 0.181 during model training and testing, respectively. In the case of the low heating value model, during model testing, the R2 was 0.971 and RF and AdaBoost, respectively, during model training and 0.842 during the model test phase. Both ML techniques provided excellent results compared to linear regression, but RFt was the best among all three.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Machine learning based modelling for lower heating value prediction of municipal solid waste
    Birgen, Cansu
    Magnanelli, Elisa
    Carlsson, Per
    Skreiberg, Oyvind
    Mosby, Jostein
    Becidan, Michael
    FUEL, 2021, 283
  • [2] Interpretable machine learning to model biomass and waste gasification
    Ascher, Simon
    Wang, Xiaonan
    Watson, Ian
    Sloan, William
    You, Siming
    BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2022, 364
  • [3] A thermal control methodology based on a machine learning forecasting model for indoor heating
    Abdellatif, Makram
    Chamoin, Julien
    Nianga, Jean-Marie
    Defer, Didier
    ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2022, 255
  • [4] Machine learning modeling of supercritical water gasification for predictive hydrogen production from waste biomass
    Khandelwal, Kapil
    Nanda, Sonil
    Dalai, Ajay K.
    BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2025, 197
  • [5] Process modelling integrated with interpretable machine learning for predicting hydrogen and char yield during chemical looping gasification
    Sison, Arnold E.
    Etchieson, Sydney A.
    Gulec, Fatih
    Epelle, Emmanuel I.
    Okolie, Jude A.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2023, 414
  • [6] Hydrogen production and pollution mitigation: Enhanced gasification of plastic waste and biomass with machine learning & storage for a sustainable future
    Bin Abu Sofian, Abu Danish Aiman
    Lim, Hooi Ren
    Chew, Kit Wayne
    Khoo, Kuan Shiong
    Tan, Inn Shi
    Ma, Zengling
    Show, Pau Loke
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2024, 342
  • [7] Machine learning models for prediction the Higher Heating Value (HHV) of Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) for waste-to-energy evaluation
    Taki, Morteza
    Rohani, Abbas
    CASE STUDIES IN THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 31
  • [8] Machine-Learning-Based Model for Hurricane Storm Surge Forecasting in the Lower Laguna Madre
    Hernandez, Cesar Davila
    Ho, Jungseok
    Kim, Dongchul
    Oubeidillah, Abdoul
    ALGORITHMS, 2023, 16 (05)
  • [9] Investment risk forecasting model using extreme value theory approach combined with machine learning
    Melina, Melina
    Sukono
    Napitupulu, Herlina
    Mohamed, Norizan
    AIMS MATHEMATICS, 2024, 9 (11): : 33314 - 33352
  • [10] Effects of waste-based pyrolysis as heating source: Meta-analyze of char yield and machine learning analysis
    Huang, Zhenhua
    Manzo, Maurizio
    Xia, Changlei
    Cai, Liping
    Zhang, Yaoli
    Liu, Zhijia
    Nadda, Ashok Kumar
    Quyet Van Le
    Sonne, Christian
    Lam, Su Shiung
    FUEL, 2022, 318