Land Property Rights, Spatial Form, and Land Performance: A Framework of Policy Performance Evaluation on Collective-Owned Construction Land and Evidence from Rural China

被引:3
|
作者
Xu, Gaofeng [1 ]
Liu, Jian [2 ]
Zhang, Min [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Architecture & Design, Beijing 100044, Peoples R China
[2] Tsinghua Univ, Sch Architecture, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
关键词
rural land system; collective-owned construction land; land policy performance evaluation; Southern Jiangsu; China; USE TRANSITIONS; URBANIZATION; EMERGENCE;
D O I
10.3390/land13070956
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Alongside the proceeding of rural land system reform in China, it becomes more and more critical to conduct policy performance evaluations on collective-owned construction land for profitable use to reflect the achievements and deficiencies of the reform. Traditionally, land policy performance evaluation is based on the theory of "policy-performance", which fails to explain the mechanism of transaction costs. From the perspective of spatial planning, land use and the spatial form shaped by land development management and control are a representation of land property rights, as well as an expression of land policy performance. Thus, a correct understanding of the role of spatial form in the relationship between land policy and land performance is of great significance in accurately evaluating land policy performance and further improving land policies. Focusing on the interrelation among the three factors, this article highlights and elaborates on the intermediary role of spatial form between land property rights and land policy performance and puts forward the analytical framework of "land property right-spatial form-land policy performance". It then takes the case of Wujiang District of Suzhou in southern Jiangsu Province to prove the effectiveness of this analytical framework. The outcome of this study can serve as a supplement to "policy-performance" theory, which refines and deepens the analysis of transaction costs from the perspective of spatial planning. It may also help deepen the recognition of land policy performance through visualized presentations, providing a new perspective for performance evaluation in quantitative and qualitative ways.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Marketization of Collective-owned Rural Land: A Breakthrough in Shenzhen, China
    Zou, Yonghua
    Zhao, Wanxia
    Mason, Robert
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (12): : 9114 - 9123
  • [2] Will Rural Collective-Owned Commercial Construction Land Marketization Impact Local Governments' Interest Distribution? Evidence from Mainland China
    Zhang, Mingyu
    Chen, Qiuxiao
    Zhang, Kewei
    Yang, Dongye
    LAND, 2021, 10 (02) : 1 - 20
  • [3] What Is Farmers' Level of Satisfaction under China's Policy of Collective-Owned Commercial Construction Land Marketisation?
    Liu, Jiali
    Wang, Hengwei
    LAND, 2022, 11 (08)
  • [4] Land property rights and rural enterprise growth: Evidence from land titling reform in China
    Bu, Di
    Liao, Yin
    JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2022, 157
  • [5] Rural collective construction land use in China: Policy issues and options
    GUO Yi-qiang
    JIANG Guang-hui
    LI Hong-tao
    WANG Jun
    Ecological Economy, 2015, 11 (01) : 62 - 71
  • [6] Performance Evaluation of Industrial Land Policy in China
    Zheng, Xinqi
    Geng, Bing
    Wu, Xiang
    Lv, Lina
    Hu, Yecui
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2014, 6 (08): : 4823 - 4838
  • [7] How Do Farmers Realize Their Rights on the Collective Land in Rural China? An Explanatory Framework for Deconstructing the Subject of Collective Land Ownership
    Chen, Yixiang
    Jin, Xiangmu
    LAND, 2023, 12 (09)
  • [8] Are private property rights better? evidence from the marketization of land rentals in rural China
    Tongwei Qiu
    Xianlei Ma
    Biliang Luo
    Economic Change and Restructuring, 2022, 55 : 875 - 902
  • [9] Are private property rights better? evidence from the marketization of land rentals in rural China
    Qiu, Tongwei
    Ma, Xianlei
    Luo, Biliang
    ECONOMIC CHANGE AND RESTRUCTURING, 2022, 55 (02) : 875 - 902
  • [10] Common property rights and land reallocations in rural China: Evidence from a village survey
    Kung, JKS
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2000, 28 (04) : 701 - 719