Environmental, social, and governance tools and investment fund portfolio characteristics: a practical-question-oriented review

被引:2
|
作者
Gao, Xiang [1 ]
Koedijk, Kees [2 ,3 ]
Ryu, Sunghan [4 ]
Wetzels, Stan [5 ]
Zhou, Zhenfei [6 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Business Sch, Res Ctr Finance, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Ctr Econ Policy Res, London, England
[3] Univ Utrecht, Sch Econ, Utrecht, Netherlands
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, USC SJTU Inst Cultural & Creat Ind, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[5] Maastricht Univ, Dept Finance, Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Guangxi Univ Foreign Languages, Sch Business & Publ Adm, Nanning, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
environment; social; governance; responsible investment; sustainable development; RESPONSIBLE FUNDS; SHAREHOLDER ACTIVISM; ENERGY LABELS; PERFORMANCE; MARKET; SUSTAINABILITY; INVESTORS; RETURNS; IMPACT; DEBT;
D O I
10.3389/frsus.2023.1323304
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper presents a literature review with the aim of facilitating investment funds to understand the practical question of whether investing responsibly can make a fund's portfolios more sustainable without compromising their return/risk profiles. The study contains most of the leading ESG research from the past two decades. We conclude from this research that the relationship between ESG and return/risk profile is predominantly neutral or even positive. Many scholars have found evidence on the performance of stocks, bonds, and real estate. The findings apply to Environmental, Social, and Governance criteria separately and in different regions. We contribute to the body of knowledge accessible to ESG-asset-seeking funds by complementing the impact investment theory and by linking ESG investment to portfolio-level characteristics and investor preferences. Looking into the future, we identify recent trends and developments in this niche field of ESG at the end of the paper.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 7 条