Comparison of Occupational Noise Exposure Assessment Methods: A Systematic Review

被引:0
|
作者
Makaruse, Nyasha [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Maslin, Mike [1 ,2 ]
Shai-Campbell, Ziva [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Sch Psychol Speech & Hearing, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
[2] Eisdell Moore Ctr Hearing & Balance Res, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Braun Sch Publ Hlth, Jerusalem, Israel
来源
EAR AND HEARING | 2024年 / 45卷 / 04期
关键词
Dosimetry; Exposure assessment; Hearing conservation; Noise assessment; Noise-induced hearing loss; Occupational hazards; Occupational noise; Overall accuracy; HEARING-LOSS; ACCURACY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000001479
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives:The purpose of this systematic review of publications was to evaluate existing evidence on the accuracy and precision of alternative occupational noise assessment methods, with personal noise dosimetry as the reference.Design:A structured literature search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Embase in July 2021 and 2022. The Covidence software was used for importing articles, screening titles and abstracts, full-text review, and study selection. Two reviewers independently conducted the title, abstract, and full-text screening of eligible studies. The reporting of this systematic review was guided by the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The quality of selected articles was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies.Results:In total, 11 studies consistent with the study selection criteria were identified out of 327 articles from the initial search. The noise-measurement methods identified in the selected studies included subjective rating through a questionnaire, expert opinion, smartwatch, sound level meter, sound level meter combined with a radio-frequency identification system, smart devices, workgroup dosimetry sampling, task-based measurement (TBM), and hybrid TBM. The hybrid method (a combination of task-based, subjective rating, and trade mean measurements) was the best alternative to full-shift personal noise-dosimetry with a negligible bias of 0.1 dB, precision of 2.4 dBA, and accuracy of 2.4 dBA.Conclusion:A variety of lower-cost TBM methods had relatively high accuracy and precision levels comparable to personal dosimetry. These findings are particularly relevant for low-income countries where occupational noise measurements should be obtained with minimal work disruptions and costs. However, it should also be noted that TBMs are greatly affected by job variation, multiple tasks, or mobile tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 815
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Occupational noise exposure and hearing: a systematic review
    Arve Lie
    Marit Skogstad
    Håkon A. Johannessen
    Tore Tynes
    Ingrid Sivesind Mehlum
    Karl-Christian Nordby
    Bo Engdahl
    Kristian Tambs
    International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 2016, 89 : 351 - 372
  • [2] Occupational noise exposure and hearing: a systematic review
    Lie, Arve
    Skogstad, Marit
    Johannessen, Hakon A.
    Tynes, Tore
    Mehlum, Ingrid Sivesind
    Nordby, Karl-Christian
    Engdahl, Bo
    Tambs, Kristian
    INTERNATIONAL ARCHIVES OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH, 2016, 89 (03) : 351 - 372
  • [3] Neurobehavioral Alterations in Occupational Noise Exposure: A Systematic Review
    Mucci, Nicola
    Traversini, Veronica
    Lulli, Lucrezia Ginevra
    Vimercati, Luigi
    Rapisarda, Venerando
    Galea, Raymond Paul
    De Sio, Simone
    Arcangeli, Giulio
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (21)
  • [4] Exposure to occupational noise in police-a systematic review
    Reis, A. C.
    Vaz, M.
    OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HYGIENE VI, 2018, : 53 - 59
  • [5] Occupational noise exposure during pregnancy: A systematic review
    Bastos, M. A.
    Duarte, S. C. A.
    Araujo, R. M. S.
    Ramalho, C.
    Torres da Costa, J.
    OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HYGIENE II, 2014, : 793 - 799
  • [6] Retrospective Exposure Assessment Methods Used in Occupational Human Health Risk Assessment: A Systematic Review
    Borghi, Francesca
    Mazzucchelli, Libero Andrea
    Campagnolo, Davide
    Rovelli, Sabrina
    Fanti, Giacomo
    Keller, Marta
    Cattaneo, Andrea
    Spinazze, Andrea
    Cavallo, Domenico Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (17) : 1 - 17
  • [7] Disorders Induced by Direct Occupational Exposure to Noise: Systematic Review
    Domingo-Pueyo, Andrea
    Sanz-Valero, Javier
    Wanden-Berghe, Carmina
    NOISE & HEALTH, 2016, 18 (84): : 229 - 239
  • [8] Occupational scenarios and exposure assessment to formaldehyde: A systematic review
    Cammalleri, Vittoria
    Pocino, Roberta Noemi
    Marotta, Daniela
    Protano, Carmela
    Sinibaldi, Federica
    Simonazzi, Stefano
    Petyx, Marta
    Iavicoli, Sergio
    Vitali, Matteo
    INDOOR AIR, 2022, 32 (01)
  • [9] Effect of occupational noise exposure on cortisol hormone level: A systematic review
    Naderyan Fe'li, Shadi
    Monazzam Esmaielpour, Mohammad Reza
    Hokmabadi, Rajabali
    Rezaei-Hachesu, Vida
    Noise and Vibration Worldwide, 2022, 53 (11): : 579 - 588
  • [10] Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Organic Flame Retardants: A Systematic Review
    Gravel, Sabrina
    Aubin, Simon
    Labreche, France
    ANNALS OF WORK EXPOSURES AND HEALTH, 2019, 63 (04) : 386 - 406