The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 prophylaxis and clinical assessment: an updated meta-analysis of randomized trials

被引:0
|
作者
Han, Xudong [1 ]
Shi, Wei [1 ]
Yang, Ya [1 ]
机构
[1] Dahua Hosp, Nursing Dept, 901 Laohumin Rd, Shanghai 200237, Peoples R China
关键词
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); hydroxychloroquine (HCQ); efficacy; adverse events; prophylaxis; CORONAVIRUS; CHLOROQUINE; BIAS;
D O I
10.21037/jtd-24-144
中图分类号
R56 [呼吸系及胸部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), a disease that affected tens of millions of people, upended the lives of countless individuals around the globe. The chloroquine (CQ) and its analogue hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were the most frequently cited as potential treatments and preventatives against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). The primary aim of this investigation was to scrutinize the effectiveness and safety of HCQ for COVID-19 prevention and to present powerful evidence and reference for clinical practice. Methods: PubMed, Ovid and the Cochrane COVID-19 Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were systematically searched from inception to January 31, 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) trials that included participants who were SARS-CoV-2 negative at the time of registration were enrolled in this metaanalysis. The intervention group took HCQ or CQ orally. The control group was not blinded by quinine or placebo. Pooled relative risk (RR) of SARS-CoV-2 infection, mortality, hospitalization, adverse events, and compliance were calculated. The software tools utilized for statistical analyses were Stata 14 and Review Manager 5.3. Results: A total of 9 studies including 7,825 participants were enrolled. Bias of individual studies were assessed as low risk. The pooled RR for SARS-CoV-2 infection was 0.75 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.83] (z=-4.01, P<0.0001; I-2=11%). The pooled RR for hospitalization was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.35-1.50) (z=0.87, P=0.39; I-2=0.0%). The pooled RR for mortality and adverse events were 3.26 (95% CI: 0.13-79.74) (z=0.72, P=0.47; I-2=0.0%) and 1.90 (95% CI: 1.20-3.02) (z=2.73, P=0.0063; I-2=94%). Conclusions: Results of this meta-analysis indicated significant impact of HCQ on SARS-CoV-2 infection with higher risk of adverse events. These findings must be considered with caution, and further research is necessary to delineate the specific circumstances where HCQ may be effective for COVID-19 prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:2983 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine for COVID-19 prophylaxis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials
    Lewis, Kimberley
    Chaudhuri, Dipayan
    Alshamsi, Fayez
    Carayannopoulos, Laiya
    Dearness, Karin
    Chagla, Zain
    Alhazzani, Waleed
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (01):
  • [2] Use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine in patients with COVID-19: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Bignardi, Paulo Roberto
    Vengrus, Carolina Santos
    Aquino, Bruno Matos
    Cerci Neto, Alcindo
    PATHOGENS AND GLOBAL HEALTH, 2021, 115 (03) : 139 - 150
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Pormohammad, Ali
    Zarei, Mohammad
    Ghorbani, Saied
    Mohammadi, Mehdi
    Razizadeh, Mohammad Hossein
    Turner, Diana L.
    Turner, Raymond J.
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (05)
  • [4] Safety and efficacy of hydroxychloroquine as prophylactic against COVID-19 in healthcare workers: a meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials
    Hong, Hwanhee
    Friedland, Anne
    Hu, Mengyi
    Anstrom, Kevin J.
    Halabi, Susan
    McKinnon, John E.
    Amaravadi, Ravi
    Rojas-Serrano, Jorge
    Abella, Benjamin S.
    Margarita Portillo-Vazquez, Angelica
    Woods, Christopher W.
    Hernandez, Adrian F.
    Boulware, David R.
    Naggie, Susanna
    Rajasingham, Radha
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (06):
  • [5] Safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled and randomized clinical trials
    Beladiya, Jayesh
    Kumar, Anup
    Vasava, Yogesh
    Parmar, Krupanshu
    Patel, Dipanshi
    Patel, Sandip
    Dholakia, Sandip
    Sheth, Devang
    Boddu, Sai H. S.
    Patel, Chirag
    REVIEWS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2024, 34 (01)
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of azithromycin in Covid-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Kamel, Ahmed M.
    Monem, Mona S. A.
    Sharaf, Nour A.
    Magdy, Nada
    Farid, Samar F.
    REVIEWS IN MEDICAL VIROLOGY, 2022, 32 (01)
  • [7] Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials of hydroxychloroquine for the prevention of COVID-19
    Garcia-Albeniz, Xabier
    del Amo, Julia
    Polo, Rosa
    Morales-Asencio, Jose Miguel
    Hernan, Miguel A.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2022, 37 (08) : 789 - 796
  • [8] Safety of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 and other diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 53 randomized trials
    Chen, Can
    Pan, Kunming
    Wu, Bingjie
    Li, Xiaoye
    Chen, Zhangzhang
    Xu, Qing
    Li, Xiaoyu
    Lv, Qianzhou
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2021, 77 (01) : 13 - 24
  • [9] Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials of hydroxychloroquine for the prevention of COVID-19
    Xabier García-Albéniz
    Julia del Amo
    Rosa Polo
    José Miguel Morales-Asencio
    Miguel A Hernán
    European Journal of Epidemiology, 2022, 37 : 789 - 796
  • [10] Safety of hydroxychloroquine in COVID-19 and other diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 53 randomized trials
    Can Chen
    Kunming Pan
    Bingjie Wu
    Xiaoye Li
    Zhangzhang Chen
    Qing Xu
    Xiaoyu Li
    Qianzhou Lv
    European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2021, 77 : 13 - 24