共 50 条
Perampanel for the treatment of epilepsy with genetic aetiology: Real-world evidence from the PERMIT Extension study
被引:2
|作者:
Delanty, Norman
[1
,11
]
Mohanraj, Rajiv
[2
]
Shankar, Rohit
[3
]
Wehner, Tim
[4
,5
,12
]
Stephen, Linda J.
[6
]
'Souza, Wendyl
[7
]
Cappucci, Sheri
[8
]
Mcmurray, Rob
[9
]
Sainz-Fuertes, Ricardo
[9
]
Villanueva, Vicente
[10
]
机构:
[1] Beaumont Hosp, Dept Neurol, Dublin, Ireland
[2] Salford Royal Hosp, Greater Manchester Neurosci Ctr, Salford, England
[3] Peninsula Sch Med, Plymouth, England
[4] UCL, Natl Hosp Neurol & Neurosurg, UCLH Fdn Trust, London, England
[5] UCL, Dept Clin & Expt Epilepsy, London, England
[6] West Glasgow Ambulatory Care Hosp, Epilepsy Unit, Glasgow City, Scotland
[7] Univ Melbourne, St Vincents Hosp Melbourne, Dept Med, Parkville, Vic, Australia
[8] Eisai Inc, Nutley, NJ USA
[9] Eisai Europe Ltd, Hatfield, England
[10] Hosp Univ & Politecn La Fe, Refractory Epilepsy Unit, Valencia, Spain
[11] Beaumont Hosp, FutureNeuro Res Ctr, Sch Pharm & Biomol Sci, RCSI, Dublin, Ireland
[12] Ruhr Univ Bochum, Ruhr Epileptol, Bochum, Germany
关键词:
Epilepsy;
Epilepsy syndrome;
Genetic etiology;
Idiopathic generalized epilepsy;
Perampanel;
Real-world;
RANDOMIZED PHASE-III;
ADJUNCTIVE PERAMPANEL;
SEIZURES;
D O I:
10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107339
中图分类号:
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Genetic factors contribute to the aetiology of epilepsy in >50% of cases, and information on the use of antiseizure medications in people with specific aetiologies will help guide treatment decisions. The PERMIT Extension study pooled data from two real -world studies (PERMIT and PROVE) to investigate the effectiveness and safety/ tolerability of perampanel (PER) when used to treat people with focal and generalised epilepsy in everyday clinical practice. This post -hoc analysis of PERMIT Extension explored the use of PER when used to treat individuals presumed to have epilepsy with a genetic aetiology. Assessments included retention rate (evaluated at 3, 6 and 12 months), effectiveness (responder and seizure freedom rates; evaluated at 3, 6, 12 months and the last visit [last observation carried forward) and tolerability (adverse events [AEs]). Of the 6822 people with epilepsy included in PERMIT Extension, 1012 were presumed to have a genetic aetiology. The most common genetic aetiologies were idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE; 58.2%), tuberous sclerosis (1.1%), Dravet syndrome (0.8%) and genetic epilepsy with febrile seizures plus (GEFS+; 0.5%). Retention rates at 3, 6 and 12 months in the total genetic aetiology population were 89.3%, 79.7% and 65.9%, respectively. In the total genetic aetiology population, responder rates at 12 months and the last visit were 74.8% and 68.3%, respectively, and corresponding seizure freedom rates were 48.9% and 46.5%, respectively. For the specific aetiology subgroups, responder rates at 12 months and the last visit were, respectively: 90.4% and 84.4% (IGE), 100% and 57.1% (tuberous sclerosis), 100% and 71.4% (Dravet syndrome), and 33.3% and 20.0% (GEFS+). Corresponding seizure freedom rates were, respectively: 73.1% and 64.6% (IGE), 33.3% and 22.2% (tuberous sclerosis), 20.0% and 28.6% (Dravet syndrome), and 0% and 0% (GEFS+). The incidence of AEs was 46.5% for the total genetic aetiology population, 48.8% for IGE, 27.3% for tuberous sclerosis, 62.5% for Dravet syndrome, and 20% for GEFS+. Tolerability findings were consistent with PER's known safety profile. PER was effective and generally well tolerated when used in individuals with a presumed genetic epilepsy aetiology in clinical practice. PER was effective across a wide range of genetic aetiologies.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文