CausalCity: Complex Simulations with Agency for Causal Discovery and Reasoning

被引:0
|
作者
McDuff, Daniel [1 ]
Song, Yale [1 ]
Lee, Jiyoung [2 ]
Vineet, Vibhav [1 ]
Vemprala, Sai [1 ]
Gyde, Nicholas [3 ]
Salman, Hadi [3 ]
Sohn, Kwanghoon [4 ]
Ma, Shuang [1 ]
Kapoor, Ashish [1 ]
机构
[1] Microsoft, Redmond, WA 98052 USA
[2] NAVER AI Lab, Kyonggi Do, South Korea
[3] MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[4] Yonsei Univ, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Causal Reasoning; Simulation; ATTENTION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The ability to perform causal and counterfactual reasoning are central properties of human intelligence. Decision-making systems that can perform these types of reasoning have the potential to be more generalizable and interpretable. Simulations have helped advance the state-of-the-art in this domain, by providing the ability to systematically vary parameters (e.g., confounders) and generate examples of the outcomes in the case of counterfactual scenarios. However, simulating complex temporal causal events in multi-agent scenarios, such as those that exist in driving and vehicle navigation, is challenging. To help address this, we present a high-fidelity simulation environment that is designed for developing algorithms for causal discovery and counterfactual reasoning in the safety-critical context. A core component of our work is to introduce agency, such that it is simple to define and create complex scenarios using high-level definitions. The vehicles then operate with agency to complete these objectives, meaning low-level behaviors need only be controlled if necessary. We perform experiments with three state-of-the-art methods to create baselines and highlight the affordances of this environment. Finally, we highlight challenges and opportunities for future work.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Causal discovery and reasoning for geotechnical risk analysis
    Liu, Wenli
    Liu, Fenghua
    Fang, Weili
    Love, Peter E. D.
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 241
  • [2] Causal Discovery with Deductive Reasoning: One Less Problem
    Kim, Jonghwan
    Hwang, Inwoo
    Lee, Sanghack
    UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 244 : 1999 - 2017
  • [3] Who is to blame? The impact of views of causal agency on reasoning and decision making
    DaCosta, MC
    Chinn, CA
    ICLS2004: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, PROCEEDINGS: EMBRACING DIVERSITY IN THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2004, : 593 - 593
  • [4] Causal discovery and counterfactual reasoning to optimize persuasive dialogue policies
    Zeng, Donghuo
    Legaspi, Roberto
    Sun, Yuewen
    Dong, Xinshuai
    Ikeda, Kazushi
    Spirtes, Peter
    Zhang, Kun
    BEHAVIOUR & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, 2025,
  • [5] A Complex Systems Approach to Causal Discovery in Psychiatry
    Saxe, Glenn N.
    Statnikov, Alexander
    Fenyo, David
    Ren, Jiwen
    Li, Zhiguo
    Prasad, Meera
    Wall, Dennis
    Bergman, Nora
    Briggs, Ernestine C.
    Aliferis, Constantin
    PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (03):
  • [6] CAUSAL REASONING ABOUT COMPLEX PHYSIOLOGICAL-MECHANISMS BY NOVICES
    PATEL, VL
    GROEN, GJ
    CHAWLA, AS
    BULLETIN OF THE PSYCHONOMIC SOCIETY, 1988, 26 (06) : 491 - 491
  • [7] Causal reasoning
    Christoph Hoerl
    Philosophical Studies, 2011, 152 : 167 - 179
  • [8] Causal reasoning
    Hoerl, Christoph
    PHILOSOPHICAL STUDIES, 2011, 152 (02) : 167 - 179
  • [9] Data-Driven Decision Support for Business Processes: Causal Reasoning and Discovery
    Alaee, Ali J.
    Weidlich, Matthias
    Senderovich, Arik
    BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT FORUM, BPM 2024, 2024, 526 : 90 - 106
  • [10] Simulations evaluating resampling methods for causal discovery: ensemble performance and calibration
    Kummerfeld, Erich
    Rix, Alexander
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BIOINFORMATICS AND BIOMEDICINE (BIBM), 2019, : 2586 - 2593