A hybrid decision support framework for planning a risk-based audit engagement

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Yan [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xiong [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Xiaozhuang Univ, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Celanese China Holding Co Ltd, Nanjing Branch, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[4] Celanese China Holding Co Ltd, Internal Audit Dept Asia, Nanjing Branch, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Audit engagement planning; risk analysis; resource allocation; best worst method; weighted multi-choice goal programming; CONSTRUCTION; SELECTION; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1080/01605682.2024.2368615
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Internal audit engagement planning is a fundamental component of internal audit activities, and a poor plan can impair the audit quality. However, studies on internal audit engagement planning have limited exposure in the literature. To the best of our knowledge, a comprehensive and robust model has not been established to address the decision-making problems associated with the audit engagement planning process. To fill these gaps, an integrated multi-stage framework is presented for developing a risk-based audit engagement plan. The designed framework includes three stages to carry out the decision procedure. First, a combined method of best worst method and weighted probability-impact score is used to evaluate the risk exposure. Second, risk assessment results are integrated into the weighted multi-choice goal programming (WMCGP) model for selecting the audit scope and allocating budgeted audit hours. Third, WMCGP model assigns audit staff to the selected audit scope to satisfy auditor preference and fitness. Two real-life case studies illustrate that the proposed framework is a useful tool for selecting the critical audit scope and deploying appropriate resources. The research results outperform the manual procedures, enabling the audit team to use constrained resources more effectively and efficiently.
引用
收藏
页码:498 / 513
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Framework of Risk-based Decision Support System in Crime Investigation
    Noor, Noor Maizura Mohamad
    Ghazali, Ahmad Faiz
    Saman, Md Yazid Mohd
    Nor, Mohd Nazli Mohd
    DSS 2.0 - SUPPORTING DECISION MAKING WITH NEW TECHNOLOGIES, 2014, 261 : 447 - 458
  • [2] RISK-BASED AUDIT-PLANNING MODEL
    Zuca, Stefan
    METALURGIA INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 15 (10): : 141 - 147
  • [3] LIVING PSA programme - A support framework for a risk-based decision making
    Patrik, M
    PSAM 5: PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1-4, 2000, (34): : 2473 - 2478
  • [4] Framework for Risk-Based Decision Support on Infiltration and Inflow to Wastewater Systems
    Saletti, Anna Ohlin
    Rosen, Lars
    Lindhe, Andreas
    WATER, 2021, 13 (17)
  • [5] Risk-based emergency decision support
    Körte, J
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2003, 82 (03) : 235 - 246
  • [6] Multiplicative criteria aggregation technique for risk-based audit planning
    Goman, Maksim
    Koch, Stefan
    2019 14TH IBERIAN CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGIES (CISTI), 2019,
  • [7] A FRAMEWORK FOR CONDITION MONITORING AND RISK-BASED DECISION SUPPORT INVOLVING A VESSEL STATE OBSERVER
    Han, Xu
    Leira, Bernt J.
    Saevik, Svein
    Radhakrishnan, Gowtham
    Skjong, Stian
    Kyllingstad, Lars T.
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2021 40TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE AND ARCTIC ENGINEERING (OMAE2021), VOL 2, 2021,
  • [8] A proposed framework for implementing risk-based Shari'ah audit
    Sani, Suleiman Dalhatu
    Abubakar, Mustapha
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND ACCOUNTING, 2021, 19 (03) : 349 - 368
  • [9] Risk-Based Decision Support for Seismic Rehabilitation of Structures
    Park, Joonam
    Lee, Do-Hyung
    Choi, Eunsoo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF STEEL STRUCTURES, 2009, 9 (02) : 107 - 114
  • [10] Risk-Based Decision Framework for Resilient Highway Bridges
    Lounis, Z.
    Almansour, H.
    LIFE-CYCLE OF ENGINEERING SYSTEMS: EMPHASIS ON SUSTAINABLE CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE, 2017, : 1414 - 1419