共 50 条
Second-line treatment outcomes after first-line chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in Extensive-Stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients: A large French multicenter study
被引:3
|作者:
Pons-Tostivint, Elvire
[1
,2
]
Ezzedine, Remy
[3
]
Goronflot, Thomas
[4
]
Crequit, Perrine
[5
]
Chatellier, Thierry
[6
]
Raimbourg, Judith
[7
]
Bennouna, Jaafar
[5
]
Leprieur, Etienne Giroux
[3
]
Porte, Marie
[1
]
机构:
[1] Nantes Univ, Ctr Hosp Univ Nantes, Med oncol, F-44000 Nantes, France
[2] Nantes Univ, Univ Angers, Inserm UMR 1307, CNRS UMR 6075,CRCI2NA Nantes, Nantes, France
[3] CHU Ambroise Pare, Serv Pneumol & Oncol Thorac, Boulogne Billancourt, France
[4] Nantes Univ, CHU Nantes, Clin donnees, INSERM,Pole Hosp Univ St Publ 11,CIC 1413, F-44000 Nantes, France
[5] Foch Hosp, Med Oncol Dept, F-92150 Suresnes, France
[6] Clin Mutualiste Estuaire, Med Oncol Unit, St Nazaire, France
[7] Inst Cancerol Ouest, Comprehens Canc Ctr, Dept Med Oncol, St Herblain, France
来源:
关键词:
OPEN-LABEL;
RESPONSE RATES;
ETOPOSIDE;
TOPOTECAN;
LURBINECTEDIN;
CARBOPLATIN;
INHIBITORS;
TRIAL;
CARE;
D O I:
10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107887
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Introduction: Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (CT-IO) is the standard treatment for patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC). This study evaluates the effectiveness of second-line (2L) following CT-IO.<br /> Patients and Methods: All patients from 10 centers who received a 2L after a first-line CT-IO were included. They were divided into 3 groups: platinum-based, lurbinectedin or others (topotecan, CAV, taxanes). We assessed overall survival (OS) and 2L progression-free survival (2L-PFS) according to treatment and platinum freeinterval (PFI) < or >= 90 days. Results: Among 82 patients included, median age was 67.0 years, 29.3 % had a Performans Status >= 2, 36.6 % had brain progression, 69.5 % were considered "platine-sensitive" and 30.5 % "platine-resistant" (PFI >= or < 90 days, respectively). As 2L, 37/82 patients (45.1 %) received platinum-doublet, 21/82 (25.6 %) lurbinectedin and 24/82 (29.3 %) others. Patients with a PFI >= 90 days received mainly platinum-based rechallenge (34/57, 59.6 %). With a median follow-up of 18.5 months, the median OS was 5.0 months (95 %CI, 1.5-7.9) / 6.8 months (95 %CI, 5.5-8.7) for platinum-resistant / sensitive, respectively (log rank p = 0.017). The median 2L-PFS was 1.9 months (95 %CI, 1.2-4.7) / 3.9 months (95 %CI, 2.9-6.0) for platinum-resistant / sensitive, respectively. Median OS was 8.1 (95 %CI, 6.3-12.9) / 4.9 (95 %CI, 3.7-6.8) / 5.1 months (95 %CI, 2.5-7.8) with platinum rechallenge / lurbinectedin / others, respectively (p = 0.017). Median 2L-PFS was 4.6 (95 %CI, 3.9-7.2) / 2.7 (95 %CI, 1.6-3.9) / 2.2 months (95 %CI, 1.5-4.1) with platinum rechallenge / lurbinectedin / others, respectively (p = 0.025).<br /> Discussion: Platinum-based rechallenge after a first-line CT-IO showed promising results despite particularly unfavorable characteristics within our real-word population. Lurbinectedin when used after IO demonstrated as low efficacy as other platinum-free regimens.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文