Moral Minefields. How Sociologists Debate Good Science

被引：0

|

作者：

Larsen, Hakon ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Oslo Metropolitan Univ, Oslo, Norway

来源：

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CULTURAL SOCIOLOGY | 2024年

关键词：

D O I：

10.1057/s41290-024-00226-8

中图分类号：

C91 [社会学];

学科分类号：

030301 ; 1204 ;

摘要：

引用

收藏

页数：9

相关论文

共 50 条

[1] Moral Minefields: How Sociologists Debate Good Science
Pan, Qixin
INTERNATIONAL SOCIOLOGY, 2024, 39 (05) : 532 - 534
[2] Moral Minefields: How Sociologists Debate Good Science
Pfohl, Stephen
Dromi, Shai M.
Stabler, Samuel D.
CONTEMPORARY SOCIOLOGY-A JOURNAL OF REVIEWS, 2025, 54 (02) : 129 - 131
[3] Review of "Moral Minefields: How Sociologists Debate Good Science"
Miles, Corey J.
SOCIAL FORCES, 2024, 103 (01)
[4] Public debate is good for science
Thorp, H. Holden
SCIENCE, 2021, 371 (6526) : 213 - 213
[5] How Good Is Science?
Sarewitz, Daniel
ISSUES IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 37 (04) : 13 - 15
[6] How to be good: The possibility of moral enhancement
Miller, Lantz Fleming
THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOETHICS, 2018, 39 (02) : 157 - 164
[7] How to be Good: The Possibility of Moral Enhancement
Hopster, Jeroen
ETHICAL PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 23 (04) : 757 - 759
[8] How to Be Good: The Possibility of Moral Enhancement
Hauskeller, Michael
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 2016, 46 (06) : 45 - 46
[9] How to Be Good: The Possibility of Moral Enhancement
Coggon, John
CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 2016, 25 (04) : 733 - 737
[10] Science in Congress: Good-faith debate
Conrad, James W., Jr.
SCIENCE, 2015, 349 (6247) : 486 - 486

← 1 2 3 4 5 →