Estimating survival scenarios in advanced or metastatic gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials

被引:0
|
作者
Naher, Sayeda K. [1 ,2 ]
Mercieca-Bebber, Rebecca [1 ]
Siu, Derrick [1 ]
Stockler, Martin R. [1 ]
Kiely, Belinda E. [1 ]
Grimison, Peter [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, NHMRC CTC, Level 4-6 Med Fdn Bldg,92-94 Parramatta Rd, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Hlth Dist, Warrawong, NSW, Australia
[3] Chris OBrien Lifehouse, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
关键词
Prognosis; gastric adenocarcinoma; advanced; metastatic; communication; CHEMOTHERAPY-NAIVE PATIENTS; S-1 PLUS CISPLATIN; PHASE-III TRIAL; 1ST-LINE THERAPY; DOUBLE-BLIND; GASTROESOPHAGEAL JUNCTION; OPEN-LABEL; COMPARING IRINOTECAN; PERITONEAL METASTASIS; LIFE EXPECTANCY;
D O I
10.1080/03007995.2024.2376129
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundWe aimed to summarize survival data from RCTs in patients with GO adenocarcinoma; estimate and explain worst-, typical-, and best-case-scenarios of survival time; and determine if simple multiples of median overall survival (mOS) could estimate these percentiles.MethodsWe systematically searched RCTs of systemic therapies for GO adenocarcinoma published 2000-2022. The following key percentiles were extracted from overall survival curves: 90th (worst-case), 75th (lower-typical), 25th (upper-typical), and 10th (best-case). We tested if these percentiles could be estimated by simple multiples of mOS: 0.25 of the median for the 90th percentile, 0.5 for the 75th, 2 for the 25th, and 3 for the 10th.ResultsWe identified 44 trials (22,447 participants). For first line chemotherapy and immunotherapy combined (CI) trials (n = 3) worst-to-best case survival time ranged from 4 months to not reached, compared to 3-30 months for other trials (n = 27) and 1-23 months for subsequent lines (n = 14). Simple multiples of mOS accurately estimated the following survival percentiles: 90th (n = 3/3 trials), 75th (n = 3/3), and 25th (n = 2/3) in first line CI trials. In other first line trials, the mOS accurately estimated the 90th survival percentile in n = 22/27 trials, 75th percentile in n = 26/27, 25th percentile in 27/27 trials, and 10th percentile in 22/27 trials. Simple multiples of the mOS accurately predicted the 90th, 75th, 25th, and 10th survival percentiles in the majority of trials of second and subsequent lines apart from chemotherapy and immunotherapy only trials.ConclusionWe provide realistic, evidence-based prognostic information as scenarios for survival time which can inform clinical decision-making. Simple multiples of the mOS accurately estimated the percentiles for most groups.
引用
收藏
页码:1357 / 1367
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prehabilitation programs for individuals with cancer: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials
    Jose F. Meneses-Echavez
    Andrés F. Loaiza-Betancur
    Víctor Díaz-López
    Andrés M. Echavarría-Rodríguez
    Héctor Reynaldo Triana-Reina
    Systematic Reviews, 12
  • [2] Prehabilitation Programs For Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review Of Randomized-controlled Trials
    Meneses-Echavez, Jose F.
    Loaiza-Betancur, Andres F.
    Triana-Reina, Hector R.
    Diaz-Lopez, Victor A.
    Echavarria-Rodriguez, Andres M.
    MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 2021, 53 (08): : 471 - 471
  • [3] Prehabilitation programs for individuals with cancer: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials
    Meneses-Echavez, Jose F.
    Loaiza-Betancur, Andres F.
    Diaz-Lopez, Victor
    Echavarria-Rodriguez, Andres M.
    Triana-Reina, Hector Reynaldo
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2023, 12 (01)
  • [4] Interventions to improve hemodialysis adherence: A systematic review of randomized-controlled trials
    Matteson, Michelle L.
    Russell, Cynthia
    HEMODIALYSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 14 (04) : 370 - 382
  • [5] Exercise and lung cancer surgery: A systematic review of randomized-controlled trials
    Himbert, Caroline
    Klossner, Nicole
    Coletta, Adriana M.
    Barnes, Christopher A.
    Wiskemann, Joachim
    LaStayo, Paul C.
    Varghese, Thomas K., Jr.
    Ulrich, Cornelia M.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2020, 156
  • [6] Nivolumab monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab for metastatic melanoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials
    Menshawy, Amr
    Eltonob, Abdelrahman A.
    Barkat, Sarah A.
    Ghanem, Ahmed
    Mniesy, Mahmoud M.
    Mohamed, Ishak
    Abdel-Maboud, Mohamed
    Mattar, Omar M.
    Elfil, Mohamed
    Bahbah, Eshak I.
    Elgebaly, Ahmed
    MELANOMA RESEARCH, 2018, 28 (05) : 371 - 379
  • [7] Therapeutic Use of LSD in Psychiatry: A Systematic Review of Randomized-Controlled Clinical Trials
    Jose Fuentes, Juan
    Fonseca, Francina
    Elices, Matilde
    Farr, Magi
    Torrens, Marta
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 10
  • [8] Ultrasound-guided peripheral venous access: a systematic review of randomized-controlled trials
    Liu, Yiju Teresa
    Alsaawi, Abdulmohsen
    Bjornsson, Hjalti M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2014, 21 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [9] The current landscape of systemic therapy for recurrent glioblastoma: A systematic review of randomized-controlled trials
    Fazzari, Francesco G. T.
    Rose, Foster
    Pauls, Mehrnoosh
    Guay, Evelyne
    Ibrahim, Mohammed F. K.
    Basulaiman, Bassam
    Tu, Megan
    Hutton, Brian
    Nicholas, Garth
    Ng, Terry L.
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2022, 169
  • [10] Psychological interventions for interoception in mental health disorders: A systematic review of randomized-controlled trials
    Heim, Nikolas
    Bobou, Marina
    Tanzer, Michal
    Jenkinson, Paul M.
    Steinert, Christiane
    Fotopoulou, Aikaterini
    PSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2023, 77 (10) : 530 - 540