The Assessment of a Gradeless Residency Model for Software Engineering Education

被引:0
|
作者
Amer, Adan [1 ,2 ]
Sidhu, Gaganpreet
Srinivasan, Seshasai [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] McMaster Univ, W Booth Sch Engn Practice & Technol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
来源
关键词
write gradeless learning; software engineering; engineering pedagogy; STUDENTS; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.3991/ijep.v14i6.47187
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The traditional practice of assessing academic performance through conventional letter and numerical grades has faced criticism for its limitations in promoting active engagement and curiosity among students. In response, the concept of gradeless education has gained traction, with the aim of fostering a more holistic learning experience. This work explores the implementation of the residency model, a form of gradeless education, in the context of engineering education. The model focuses on skill acquisition and competency demonstration while enhancing student wellness by minimizing assessment-related anxiety that students often face in graded assessments. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the residency model through a comprehensive survey conducted in a software engineering technology program at McMaster University. The survey investigates student perspectives on the model's impact on motivation, learning experience, and attitudes towards learning. The results reveal a complex interplay of attitudes, with students acknowledging the importance of grades while appreciating the model's rigorous assignments. The findings suggest that the residency model can encourage transformative learning experiences while warranting ongoing attention to optimize both learning outcomes and student well-being. Further research is recommended to assess the long-term impact and effectiveness of gradeless education models, emphasizing both their benefits and challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:139 / 154
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The Impact of the Model-Driven Approach to Software Engineering on Software Engineering Education
    Hamou-Lhadj, Abdelwahab
    Gherbi, Abdelouahed
    Nandigam, Jagadeesh
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2009 SIXTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: NEW GENERATIONS, VOLS 1-3, 2009, : 719 - +
  • [2] Competence Assessment and Competence Reflection in Software Engineering Education
    Henschel, Lisa
    5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HIGHER EDUCATION ADVANCES (HEAD'19), 2019, : 29 - 36
  • [3] PBL-SEE: An Authentic Assessment Model for PBL-Based Software Engineering Education
    dos Santos, Simone C.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EDUCATION, 2017, 60 (02) : 120 - 126
  • [4] Studios in Software Engineering Education: Towards an Evaluable Model
    Bull, Christopher N.
    Whittle, Jon
    Cruickshank, Leon
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 35TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING (ICSE 2013), 2013, : 1063 - 1072
  • [5] The gradeless paradox: Emancipatory promises but ambivalent effects of gradeless learning in business and management education
    Kjaergaard, Annemette
    Mikkelsen, Elisabeth Naima
    Buhl-Wiggers, Julie
    MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2023, 54 (04) : 556 - 575
  • [6] Software engineering education
    Moore, MM
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 2002, 19 (05) : 103 - 103
  • [7] The software studio in software engineering education
    Kuhn, S
    Hazzan, O
    Tomayko, JE
    Corson, B
    15TH CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND TRAINING, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, : 256 - 258
  • [8] A software factory for education in software engineering
    Siqueira, Fabio Levy
    Barbaran, Gabriela M. Cabel
    Becerra, Jorge Luis Risco
    21ST CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND TRAINING, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 215 - +
  • [9] Software Engineering Education for Technical Engineering Degrees: A Comparison With the Needs of Robotics Software Engineering Education
    Daun, Marian
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 2023, 40 (06) : 40 - 46
  • [10] Trends in Software Engineering for Engineering Education
    Angel Conde-Gonzalez, Miguel
    Sarasa-Cabezuelo, Antonio
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2016, 32 (02) : 869 - 872