Proximal humeral fractures treated with arthroplasty

被引:3
|
作者
钱齐荣
吴海山
周维江
李晓华
吴宇黎
机构
[1] Department of Joint Surgery
[2] Orthopaedic Department in Changzheng Hospital
[3] Second Military Medical University
[4] Shanghai
[5] China
[6] Second Military Medical
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R687.4 [关节手术];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To explore arthroplasty in treating 3- and 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus. Methods: A total of 132 patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated in our hospital from July 1997 to February 2003. According to Neer's classification, the fractures of 45 patients (14 males and 31 females, aged 31-78 years, 56.1 years± 7.8 years on an average) belonged to 3- or 4-part fractures (10 patients with 4-part fracture and 35 with 3-part comminuted fracture) and they were treated with shoulder joint arthroplasty. Unipolar prosthesis replacement of the head of humerus was made in 28 cases, while bipolar prosthesis replacement in 2 cases and total shoulder joint replacement in 15 cases. Results: During the follow-up period (range: 12-72 months, mean: 37.3 months± 4.1 months), among the 45 patients who suffered from fractures of the proximal humerus and underwent arthroplasty surgery, 44 patients ( 97.8%) had no postoperative pain and were satisfied with the active range of motion and with the whole treatment results. And radiography showed that the prostheses were at their good position. One patient had postoperative pain because he had so narrow medullary cavity that the humeral prosthesis could not be put deeply enough and the prosthesis head was a little higher over the anatomic level. He did not have good postoperative active range of motion, either. Then he received a review surgery and got satisfied results. Temporary shoulder stiffness was observed in one patient. Manual release of these adhesions improved the shoulder function. No evidence of nonunion of the fracture segments around the humeral prosthesis stem was found. Conclusions: Shoulder arthroplasty is a dependable method to restore the comfort and function of the should joints of the patients with 3- or 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 288
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Proximal humeral fractures treated with arthroplasty
    钱齐荣
    吴海山
    周维江
    李晓华
    吴宇黎
    中华创伤杂志(英文版), 2005, (05) : 283 - 288
  • [2] Shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures
    Bondi, R.
    Ceccarelli, E.
    Campi, S.
    Padua, R.
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2005, 6 (01) : 57 - 60
  • [3] NEERS ARTHROPLASTY IN THE TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES
    WILLEMS, WJ
    LIM, AT
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1984, 55 (04): : 487 - 487
  • [4] REVERSE SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES
    George, Michael S.
    Khazzam, Michael
    Chin, Paul
    Dumont, Guillaume
    Russell, Robert
    JBJS REVIEWS, 2014, 2 (10)
  • [5] Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty in the Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures
    Craig, Edward
    TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 16 (04): : 99 - 102
  • [6] Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures
    Wall, Bryan
    Walch, Gilles
    HAND CLINICS, 2007, 23 (04) : 425 - +
  • [7] Shoulder arthroplasty for late sequelae of proximal humeral fractures
    Mansat, P
    Guity, MR
    Bellumore, Y
    Mansat, M
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2004, 13 (03) : 305 - 312
  • [8] Shoulder arthroplasty as a treatment for sequelae of proximal humeral fractures
    Abdelhady, Amr M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2010, 20 (08): : 607 - 611
  • [9] Shoulder arthroplasty as a treatment for sequelae of proximal humeral fractures
    Amr M. Abdelhady
    European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology, 2010, 20 : 607 - 611
  • [10] Proximal humeral malunion treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Willis, Matthew
    Min, William
    Brooks, Jordan P.
    Mulieri, Philip
    Walker, Matthew
    Pupello, Derek
    Frankle, Mark
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2012, 21 (04) : 507 - 513