Measurement of China's Provincial Ecological Welfare Performance and Its Influencing Factors

被引：0
|
作者：
Zhang Y.-B. [1 ]
Li X. [1 ]
Liu W. [1 ]
Kou P. [1 ]
机构：
[1] School of Business Administration, Northeastern University, Shenyang
来源：
Dongbei Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Northeastern University | 2022年 / 43卷 / 02期
关键词：
Ecological consumption index; Ecological welfare performance; Government supervision; Human development index; Public participation;
D O I：
10.12068/j.issn.1005-3026.2022.02.019
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
An ecological welfare performance model is constructed based on its definition. On this basis, the panel data of 30 provinces, cities and autonomous regions in China from 2007 to 2017 are used to measure the ecological welfare performance level, and the influencing factors that determine its differences are empirically analyzed. It is found that China's ecological welfare performance has experienced three stages of "rising-falling-rising" in the time trend, and the overall increase is 19.3%. In terms of regional characteristics, ecological welfare performance presents a pattern of "the highest in the east, the second in the west, and the lowest in the middle". Economic scale has improved China's ecological welfare performance, while government supervision, urbanization and industrial structure are the negative factors that inhibit the improvement of China's ecological welfare performance. Formalism and information asymmetry make it impossible for public participation to have an impact on the ecological welfare performance. © 2022, Editorial Department of Journal of Northeastern University. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：289 / 296
页数：7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Zhu Da-jian, Ecological economics:economics and management of sustainable development, Journal of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 6, pp. 520-530, (2008)
  • [2] Feng Ji-fang, Yuan Jian-hong, Ecological welfare performance-a new analysis tool for sustainable development, Science and Technology Management Research, 36, 12, pp. 240-244, (2016)
  • [3] Daly H E., Sustainable development:from concept and theory to operational principles[J], Population and Development Review, 16, 1, pp. 25-43, (1990)
  • [4] Common M., Measuring national economic performance without using prices[J], Ecological Economics, 64, 1, pp. 92-102, (2007)
  • [5] Dietz T, Rosa E A, York R., Environmentally efficient well-being:Is there a Kuznets curve?[J], Applied Geography, 32, 1, pp. 21-28, (2011)
  • [6] Knight K W, Rosa E A., The environmental efficiency of well-being:a cross-national analysis[J], Social Science Research, 40, 3, pp. 931-949, (2011)
  • [7] Xiao Li-ming, Ji Hui-ru, Spatial structure change and influencing factors of ecological well-being performance from perspective of green technological innovation in China, Science and Technology Management Research, 38, 17, pp. 243-251, (2018)
  • [8] Lin Ke-tao, Deng Xing-wei, Ye Jie, Evaluation of regional ecological well-being performance based on super-NSBM and Window DEA model, Journal of Eco-Environment, 29, 10, pp. 2110-2117, (2020)
  • [9] Yew K., Environmentally responsible happy nation index:towards an internationally acceptable national success indicator[J], Social Indicators Research, 85, 3, pp. 425-446, (2008)
  • [10] Zang Man-dan, Zhu Da-jian, Liu Guo-ping, Ecological well-being performance:concept, connotation and empirical of G20, China Population Resources and Environment, 23, 5, pp. 118-124, (2013)
123