Does Ecological Planting-Breeding Mix Pattern Improve Farmers' Subjective Well-Being? Evidence from the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Xinyao [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Xicong [1 ,2 ]
Zhu, Yangyang [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Zhe [1 ,2 ]
Qi, Zhenhong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[2] Hubei Rural Dev Res Ctr, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2024年 / 14卷 / 04期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
ecological planting-breeding mix pattern; subjective well-being; sustainable development; HAPPINESS; ADOPTION;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture14040528
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The Chinese government is making vigorous efforts to control agricultural pollution. The promotion of an ecological planting-breeding mix pattern is one of them. Farmers' mode of production will affect their subjective well-being. Thus, this paper aims to analyze the impact of adopting the ecological planting-breeding mix pattern on farmers' subjective well-being based on 895 pieces of survey data from the provinces of Hubei, Hunan, and Jiangxi in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Using the endogenous switching regression model, we find that the adoption of the ecological planting-breeding mix pattern has a significant positive effect on farmers' subjective well-being. Based on this counterfactual hypothesis, if the farmers who actually adopted the ecological planting-breeding mix pattern did not adopt it, their subjective well-being would decrease from 4.006 to 3.669. Further examination indicates that self-worth identification, income increase, and neighborhood communication could be potential mechanisms. Additionally, the effect of the ecological planting-breeding mix pattern on subjective well-being is stronger in the group with low financial support. The technical support provided by the government does not have a significant regulatory effect on the adoption of the ecological planting-breeding mix pattern on subjective well-being. Our results suggest that farmers' ecological production behavior can affect their subjective well-being. This may be relevant to many developing countries today that are attempting to adopt ecological agriculture patterns.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Spatial Differentiation and Influencing Factors in the Ecological Well-Being Performance of Urban Agglomerations in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River: A Hierarchical Perspective
    Zhu, Yuanyuan
    Zhang, Rui
    Cui, Jiaxing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (19)
  • [2] Does experience with agricultural loans improve farmers' well-being? Evidence from Benin
    Sagbo, Nicaise Sheila M.
    Kusunose, Yoko
    AGRICULTURAL FINANCE REVIEW, 2021, 81 (04) : 503 - 519
  • [3] New-type urbanization and ecological well-being performance: A coupling coordination analysis in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River urban agglomerations, China
    Zhang, Qiufeng
    Kong, Qingshen
    Zhang, Mingyue
    Huang, Huan
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 159
  • [4] Does land renting-out increase farmers' subjective well-being? Evidence from rural China
    Qiu, Tongwei
    He, Qinying
    Luo, Biliang
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2021, 53 (18) : 2080 - 2092
  • [5] Does climate-smart agriculture technology improve farmers' subjective well-being? Micro-level evidence from Odisha, India
    Sahoo, Dukhabandhu
    Mohanty, Pritisudha
    Mishra, Surbhi
    Behera, Manash Kumar
    Mohapatra, Souryabrata
    FARMING SYSTEM, 2025, 3 (01):
  • [6] Does government environmental governance information disclosure improve residents' subjective well-being? Evidence from China
    Chen, Jiusong
    Wang, Shanyong
    Wan, Liang
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2023, 66 (08) : 1720 - 1742
  • [7] Ecological well-being and its equity in various economic contexts: Evidence from 130 cities in the yangtze river economic belt
    Shi, Jianru
    Li, Shixiang
    Liu, Mengru
    Li, Xianmin
    Yan, Haoran
    Dong, Chengkun
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2023, 156
  • [8] Does Agroforestry Adoption Affect Subjective Well-Being? Empirical Evidence from Smallholder Farmers in East Java']Java, Indonesia
    Wijayanto, Hari Wahyu
    Lo, Kai-An
    Toiba, Hery
    Rahman, Moh Shadiqur
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (16)
  • [9] Are fishermen happier? Evidence from a large-scale subjective well-being survey in a lower-middle-income country
    Anna, Zuzy
    Yusuf, Arief A.
    Alisjahbana, Armida S.
    Ghina, Aisyah A.
    Rahma
    MARINE POLICY, 2019, 106
  • [10] Does morphological polycentric spatial structure improve subjective well-being? Evidence from China based on the moderating perspective of the urban-rural income inequality
    Li, Yuetong
    Lyu, Songyang
    Gao, Qizheng
    Lee, Seungil
    JOURNAL OF URBAN MANAGEMENT, 2025, 14 (01) : 132 - 146