Association between delayed ambulation and increased risk of adverse events after lumbar fusion surgery in elderly patients

被引:0
|
作者
Wang, Shuai-Kang [1 ,2 ]
Chai, Xin-Yi [3 ]
Wang, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Kong, Chao [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Shi-Bao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Capital Med Univ, Xuanwu Hosp, Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Dis, Dept Orthoped & Elderly Spinal Surg, 45 Changchun St, Beijing 100053, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Clin Res Ctr Geriatr Dis, Beijing 10053, Peoples R China
[3] Capital Med Univ, Beijing 10053, Peoples R China
关键词
Lumbar degenerative disease; Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion; Delayed ambulation; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Adverse events; ENHANCED RECOVERY; COLORECTAL SURGERY; OUTCOMES; MOBILIZATION; PROTOCOL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-024-07606-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose The relationship between delayed ambulation (DA) and postoperative adverse events (AEs) following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) in elderly patients remains elusive. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of DA on the postoperative AEs including complications, readmission and prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS). Methods This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively established database of elderly patients (aged 65 years and older) who underwent TLIF surgery. The early ambulation (EA) group was defined as patients ambulated within 48 h after surgery, whereas the delayed ambulation (DA) group was patients ambulated at a minimum of 48 h postoperatively. The DA patients were 1:1 propensity-score matched to the EA patients based on age, gender and the number of fused segments. Univariate analysis was used to compare postoperative outcomes between the two groups, and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify risk factors for adverse events and DA. Results After excluding 125 patients for various reasons, 1025 patients (<= 48 h: N = 659 and > 48 h: N = 366) were included in the final analysis. After propensity score matching, there were 326 matched patients in each group. There were no significant differences in the baseline data and the surgery-related variables between the two groups (p > 0.05). The patients in the DA group had a significant higher incidence of postoperative AEs (46.0% vs. 34.0%, p = 0.002) and longer LOS (p = 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression identified that age, operative time, diabetes, and DA were independently associated with postoperative AEs, whereas greater age, higher international normalized ratio, and intraoperative estimated blood loss were identified as independent risk factors for DA. Conclusions Delayed ambulation was an independent risk factor for postoperative AEs after TLIF in elderly patients. Older age, increased intraoperative blood loss and worse coagulation function were associated with delayed ambulation.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comprehensive geriatric assessment to predict adverse events in elderly patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgery
    Peng Cui
    Ting Liu
    Zheng Wang
    Shuaikang Wang
    Peng Wang
    Chao Kong
    Shibao Lu
    European Spine Journal, 2024, 33 : 274 - 281
  • [2] Comprehensive geriatric assessment to predict adverse events in elderly patients undergoing posterior lumbar fusion surgery
    Cui, Peng
    Liu, Ting
    Wang, Zheng
    Wang, Shuaikang
    Wang, Peng
    Kong, Chao
    Lu, Shibao
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024, 33 (01) : 274 - 281
  • [3] Risk Factors for Adverse Cardiac Events After Lumbar Spine Fusion
    Kaye, I. David
    Wagner, Scott C.
    Butler, Joseph S.
    Sebastian, Arjun
    Morrissey, Patrick B.
    Kepler, Christopher
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPINE SURGERY, 2018, 12 (05): : 638 - 643
  • [4] Risk Factors Analysis and Nomogram Conduction for Major Adverse Events After Lumbar Fusion Surgery in Older Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Wang, Shuaikang
    Wang, Qijun
    Wang, Peng
    Zhou, Yaru
    Lu, Shibao
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 193
  • [5] Benefits of Early Ambulation in Elderly Patients Undergoing Lumbar Decompression and Fusion Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study
    Huang, Jie
    Shi, Zhan
    Duan, Fang-fang
    Fan, Ming-xing
    Yan, Shuo
    Wei, Yi
    Han, Bing
    Lu, Xue-mei
    Tian, Wei
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2021, 13 (04) : 1319 - 1326
  • [6] Rheumatoid arthritis patients are at increased risk for adverse events following lumbar discectomy
    Ratnasamy, Philip P.
    Rudisill, Katelyn E.
    Gouzoulis, Michael J.
    Kammien, Alexander J.
    Grauer, Jonathan N.
    SPINE JOURNAL, 2023, 23 (07): : 990 - 996
  • [7] Outcomes and Complications After Elective Thoracic and Lumbar Spinal Fusion in Elderly Patients: A Comparison of Methods to Predict Adverse Events
    Ramos, Omar
    Mueller, Benjamin
    Mehbod, Amir
    Carlson, Bayard
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [8] Early identification of patients at risk for delayed recovery of ambulation after elective abdominal surgery
    Kovar, Alexandra
    Carmichael, Heather
    Jones, Teresa S.
    Hosokawa, Patrick
    Goode, Christina M.
    Overbey, Douglas M.
    Jones, Edward L.
    Robinson, Thomas N.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (07): : 4828 - 4833
  • [9] Risk factors for delirium in elderly patients after lumbar spinal fusion
    Gold, Colin
    Ray, Emanuel
    Christianson, David
    Park, Brian
    Kournoutas, Ioannis A.
    Kahn, Taimur A.
    Perez, Eli A.
    Berger, Joel I.
    Sander, Katie
    Igram, Cassim A.
    Pugely, Andrew
    Olinger, Catherine R.
    Carnahan, Ryan
    Chen, Pei-fu
    Mueller, Rashmi
    Hitchon, Patrick
    Howard, Matthew A.
    Banks, Matthew
    Sanders, Robert D.
    Woodroffe, Royce W.
    CLINICAL NEUROLOGY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 219
  • [10] Early identification of patients at risk for delayed recovery of ambulation after elective abdominal surgery
    Alexandra Kovar
    Heather Carmichael
    Teresa S. Jones
    Patrick Hosokawa
    Christina M. Goode
    Douglas M. Overbey
    Edward L. Jones
    Thomas N. Robinson
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2022, 36 : 4828 - 4833