Study on tubing string safety during perforation detonation in ultra-deep wells

被引:1
|
作者
Guo, Ruifeng [1 ]
机构
[1] JHOSC Downhole Engn Serv Co, Downhole Testing Co, Sinopec Jianghan Oilfield Serv Corp, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Perforation detonation; Wellbore safety; Ultra-deep well; string mechanics; PRESSURE; OIL;
D O I
10.1080/12269328.2024.2350716
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
To address the challenge of quantitatively predicting the wellbore pressure and the force of the tubing string below the packer during the perforation detonation, a prediction model for the wellbore pressure and the axial force of the tubing string is established. The evolution laws of the wellbore pressure and the axial force of the tubing are analyzed. The sensitivity analysis of four primary controlling factors is further studied. The obtained results indicate that the peak pressure of the wellbore at the bottom of the perforating gun is the cause of the tubing string failure. The relative error of the predicted peak pressure of the wellbore is 2.22%. The major sensitive parameters affecting the peak pressure of the wellbore at the bottom of the perforating gun and the peak axial force at the bottom of the tubing are ranked as follows: the initial wellbore pressure, the shot density, the explosive mass, and the perforating fluid density. The work presented can provide a theoretical foundation and technological basis for the quantification of the wellbore pressure and the force of the tubing string during the perforation detonation, which is critical for well completion design and wellbore safety evaluation.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 170
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shock vibration response characteristic of perforating tubing string in ultra-deep wells
    Liu, Jun
    Jian, Yilin
    Chen, Yili
    Tang, Kai
    Ren, Guohui
    Chen, Jianbo
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2023, 228
  • [2] Study on transient prediction method of dynamic underbalanced pressure after perforation detonation in ultra-deep wells
    Ding, Liangliang
    Chen, Wenkang
    Han, Chuanjun
    Xue, Yongzhi
    Lei, Qisong
    GEOENERGY SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 241
  • [3] The study on erosion of buckling tubing string in HTHP ultra-deep wells considering fluid-solid coupling
    Xu, Jiangwen
    Mou, Yisheng
    Xue, Chengwen
    Ding, Liangliang
    Wang, Ruyan
    Ma, Dudu
    ENERGY REPORTS, 2021, 7 (07) : 3011 - 3022
  • [4] Response analysis and safety control of tubing vibration in HPHT and ultra-deep gas wells
    Zhang, Zhi
    Yang, Kun
    Zheng, Yushan
    Ding, Jian
    Huo, Hongbo
    Xu, Jie
    Zhang, Xiaocheng
    Xie, Tao
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 219
  • [5] Safety Analysis of Tieback String during Fracturing in Ultra-deep Well
    Gao, Bao-Kui
    Wang, Wei
    Yuan, Jie
    Li, Yun-Zhe
    Ren, Jing-Wei
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT ENGINEERING (ICEEE 2015), 2015, : 490 - 495
  • [6] Stress and deformation characteristics of completion and testing tubing string with expansion joints for ultra-deep HTHP gas wells
    Xiangtong, Yang
    Xinpu, Shen
    Xiaohu, Cui
    Kelin, Wang
    Guoyang, Shen
    Zhaobing, Wang
    Tao, Qin
    NATURAL GAS INDUSTRY B, 2020, 7 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [7] Stress and deformation characteristics of completion and testing tubing string with expansion joints for ultra-deep HTHP gas wells
    Yang X.
    Shen X.
    Cui X.
    Wang K.
    Shen G.
    Wang Z.
    Qin T.
    Natural Gas Industry, 2019, 39 (06) : 99 - 106
  • [8] STIMULATION OF ULTRA-DEEP WELLS
    GIBBS, MA
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1968, 20 (08): : 844 - &
  • [9] Numerical Simulation Study on the Damage Mechanism of the Combined Perforating Well Testing Tubing in Ultra-Deep Wells
    Jiang, Jiadong
    Deng, Qiao
    Yang, Dong
    Qi, Guilin
    Zhang, Fan
    Tan, Leichuan
    PROCESSES, 2024, 12 (02)
  • [10] Failure analysis of P110 tubing string in the ultra-deep oil well
    Zhu, S. D.
    Wei, J. F.
    Bai, Z. Q.
    Zhou, G. S.
    Miao, J.
    Cai, R.
    ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2011, 18 (03) : 950 - 962