Multi‑scenario Simulation of Land Use Change and Its Effects Under Requisition‑Compensation Balance of Arable Land

被引：0
|
作者：
Wang Y. [1 ]
Liu D. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] School of Resource and Environmental Sciences, Wuhan University, Wuhan
[2] Key Laboratory of Digital Cartography and Land Information Application Engineering, Ministry of Natural Resources, Wuhan
[3] Hubei Luojia Laboratory, Wuhan
来源：
Wuhan Daxue Xuebao (Xinxi Kexue Ban)/Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University | 2023年 / 48卷 / 09期
关键词：
ecological effect; land use change; multi-scenario simulation; requisition‑compensation balance of arable land; system dynamics;
D O I：
10.13203/j.whugis20210144
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Objectives: The requisition-compensation balance is one of the important measures for farmland protection in China. During the development of cultivated land protection policies from traditional quantity protection to quantity-quality-ecology integration protection, few studies have examined future potential impacts of different requisition-compensation balance policies. Methods: We take Zhaoyuan City, Shandong Province as an example to construct a multi - scenario simulation model of land use change incorporating requisition - compensation balance of arable land，design five simulation scenarios, namely, baseline scenario, quantity protection of cultivated land, quantity-quality protection, quantity-ecological protection and quantity-quality-ecological protection. Then we analyze the changes in quantity, productivity and habitat quality of arable land in 2030 under different protection strategies. Results: The results show that the requisition-compensation balance policies will increase the quantity, grain yield and habitat quality of cultivated land by 7.2%, 0.63% and 0.70% on average compared with the baseline scenario. In the quantity-quality-ecological protection scenario, grain yield and habitat quality are likely to be higher than those in other scenarios, and their trade-off relationships will be better reconciled. Conclusions: This work will provide solid support for evaluation of various requisition-compensation balance strategies and adjustment of farmland protection policies. © 2023 Wuhan University. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码：1499 / 1511
页数：12
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Xiaoli Zhao, Zengxiang Zhang, Xiao Wang, Et al., Analysis of Chinese Cultivated Land’s Spatial-Tem - poral Changes and Causes in Recent 30 Years［J］, Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 30, 3, pp. 1-11, (2014)
  • [2] Jiyuan Liu, Jia Ning, Wenhui Kuang, Et al., Spatio-Temporal Patterns and Characteristics of Land-Use Change in China During 2010—2015［J］, Acta Geo⁃ graphica Sinica, 73, 5, pp. 789-802, (2018)
  • [3] Monitoring Cropland Transition and Its Impact on Ecosystem Services Value in Developed Regions of China： A Case Study of Jiangsu Province［J］, Land Use Policy, 69, pp. 25-40, (2017)
  • [4] Bailin Zhang, Jiangbo Gao, Yang Gao, Et al., Land Use Transition of Mountainous Rural Areas in China ［J］, Acta Geographica Sinica, 73, 3, pp. 503-517, (2018)
  • [5] Daniels T L., Assessing the Performance of Farm - land Preservation in America’s Farmland Preservation Heartland： A Policy Review［J］, Society & Natural Resources, 33, 6, pp. 758-768, (2020)
  • [6] Lichtenberg E，, Ding C., Assessing Farmland Protection Policy in China［J］, Land Use Policy, 25, 1, pp. 59-68, (2008)
  • [7] Taiyang Zhong, Xianjin Huang, Yi Chen, Arable Land Conversion Effects of Basic Farmland Protection Policy［J］, China Population，Resources and Environment, 22, 1, pp. 90-95, (2012)
  • [8] Alterman R., The Challenge of Farmland Preservation：Lessons from a Six-Nation Comparison［J］, Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, 2, pp. 220-243, (1997)
  • [9] Castro P，, Pedroso R，, Lautenbach S，, Et al., Farmland Abandonment in Rio de Janeiro：Underlying and Contributory Causes of an Announced Development ［J］, Land Use Policy, 95, (2020)
  • [10] Munnangi A K，, Lohani B，, Misra S C., A Review of Land Consolidation in the State of Uttar Pradesh，India：Qualitative Approach［J］, Land Use Policy, 90, (2020)
12345