Classification of Balance Assessment Technology: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews

被引:7
|
作者
Baker N. [1 ]
Gough C. [1 ]
Gordon S. [1 ]
机构
[1] ARC Research Hub for Digital Enhanced Living, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100, Adelaide, 5001, SA
来源
Baker, Nicky (nicky.baker@flinders.edu.au) | 1600年 / IOS Press BV卷 / 268期
关键词
Postural balance; reproducibility; systematic review; technology;
D O I
10.3233/SHTI200005
中图分类号
X9 [安全科学];
学科分类号
0837 ;
摘要
Accurate assessment of postural balance is necessary to identify and measure falls risk, inform clinical practice, determine efficacy of treatment and ultimately falls prevention. The aim of this scoping review was to identify gaps and inform practice, research and policy. There are a multitude of technologies available for assessing balance and no one that meets the requirements of every situation. Force plates had provided the gold standard technology for measuring centre of pressure variables as the cornerstone of balance assessment. Inertial measurements units are now considered as valid and reliable, however inertial sensors in smartphone require further refinement to measure with the same degree of accuracy. Fusion systems combine wearable and non-wearable technology in formal gait labs but also gaming. The flexibility provided choice of wearable, non-wearable and fusion systems meets most clinical and research requirements. © 2020 The authors and IOS Press. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 59
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Disinvestment in healthcare: a scoping review of systematic reviews
    Kamaruzaman, Hanin Farhana
    Grieve, Eleanor
    Wu, Olivia
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE, 2022, 38 (01)
  • [2] Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review
    Alex Pollock
    Pauline Campbell
    Caroline Struthers
    Anneliese Synnot
    Jack Nunn
    Sophie Hill
    Heather Goodare
    Jacqui Morris
    Chris Watts
    Richard Morley
    Systematic Reviews, 7
  • [3] Systematic Reviews in the Engineering Literature: A Scoping Review
    Phillips, Margaret
    Reed, Jason B.
    Zwicky, Dave
    van Epps, Amy S.
    Buhler, Amy G.
    Rowley, Erin M.
    Zhang, Qianjin
    Cox, James M.
    Zakharov, Wei
    IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 : 62648 - 62663
  • [4] A scoping review of engineering education systematic reviews
    Phillips, Margaret
    Reed, Jason B.
    Zwicky, Dave
    Van Epps, Amy S.
    JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2024, 113 (04) : 818 - 837
  • [5] Stakeholder involvement in systematic reviews: a scoping review
    Pollock, Alex
    Campbell, Pauline
    Struthers, Caroline
    Synnot, Anneliese
    Nunn, Jack
    Hill, Sophie
    Goodare, Heather
    Morris, Jacqui
    Watts, Chris
    Morley, Richard
    SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, 7
  • [6] Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review
    Spencer, Angela J.
    Eldredge, Jonathan D.
    JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL LIBRARY ASSOCIATION, 2018, 106 (01) : 46 - 56
  • [7] Pharmacist-led medication reviews: A scoping review of systematic reviews
    Craske, Miriam
    Hardeman, Wendy
    Steel, Nicholas
    Twigg, Michael James
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (09):
  • [8] Health promotion in schools: a scoping review of systematic reviews
    Chilton, Roy
    Pearson, Mark
    Anderson, Rob
    HEALTH EDUCATION, 2015, 115 (3-4) : 357 - 376
  • [9] Pharmacological Treatment of Dementia: A Scoping Review of Systematic Reviews
    van de Glind, Esther M. M.
    van Enst, Wynanda A.
    van Munster, Barbara C.
    Rikkert, Marcel G. M. Olde
    Scheltens, Philip
    Scholten, Rob J. P. M.
    Hooft, Lotty
    DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2013, 36 (3-4) : 211 - 228
  • [10] Reporting characteristics of systematic reviews in Psychology: A scoping review
    Steil, Andrea Valeria
    Dias, Natalia Martins
    Lopes, Fernanda Machado
    da Silva, Mariana Luiza Becker
    Bousfield, Andrea Barbara da Silva
    De Luca Canto, Graziela
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 27 (13) : 2964 - 2981