Characteristics of mountain vs. lowland dairy products

被引:1
|
作者
Ungureanu-Iuga, Madalina [1 ,2 ]
Surdu, Ioan [1 ]
Necula, Doru [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Romanian Acad, Mt Econ Ctr CE MONT, Costin C Kiritescu Natl Inst Econ Res INCE, 49th Petreni St, Vatra Dornei 725700, Romania
[2] Stefan cel Mare Univ Suceava, Integrated Ctr Res Dev & Innovat Adv Mat, Nanotechnol & Distributed Syst Fabricat & Control, 13th Univ St, Suceava 720229, Romania
[3] Univ Agr Sci & Vet Med Cluj Napoca, Dept Physiol, 3-5th Manastur St, Cluj Napoca 400037, Romania
关键词
Biodiversity; fatty acids; microflora; mountain dairy products; sensory profile; terpene; FATTY-ACID PROFILE; VOLATILE ORGANIC-COMPOUNDS; NUTRITIONAL QUALITY; SENSORY PROPERTIES; HUMAN HEALTH; MILK; SHEEP; PASTURE; CHEESE; GRASSLANDS;
D O I
10.1111/ijfs.17150
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
Besides the clean environment, mountain pastures are important sources of bioactive compounds that contribute to the quality of dairy products resulting from animals grazing there. This review aimed to compare the main differences among mountain and lowland dairies in terms of chemical composition, physical and sensory properties and microflora. The most important factors influencing final product properties are the biodiversity of pastures and the abundance of plants in terpenes and fatty acids, farm practices, animal breeds and climatic conditions. Differences between dairies from lowland and mountain products were observed regarding the sensory profile, microflora and nutritional and functional value. The comparisons of the results presented in the literature concluded that some mountain dairies presented more than 50% higher content of terpenes compared to lowland products. Furthermore, the amounts of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) were more than 15% greater in mountain products compared to lowland ones, conjugated linoleic acids more than 35%, n-6 and n-3 PUFA more than 10%, while the saturated fatty acids content was reported to be more than 3% lower in mountain dairies. In conclusion, mountain dairy products can be distinguished from lowland ones, especially by their content of terpenes and fatty acid profile, along with the microflora which are influenced by livestock management. This review aimed to compare the main differences among mountain and lowland dairies in terms of chemical composition, physical and sensory properties and microflora. Mountain products have superior fatty acids, terpenes and sensory profiles. image
引用
收藏
页码:4359 / 4373
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Man vs. Mountain
    Brown, Jessica Wambach
    AMERICAN HISTORY, 2019, 54 (02) : 40 - 48
  • [2] Consumer Personality Traits vs. their Preferences for the Characteristics of Wood Furniture Products
    Yu, Shulan
    Zheng, Qun
    Chen, Tianyue
    Zhang, Hongli
    Chen, Xinran
    BIORESOURCES, 2023, 18 (04) : 7443 - 7459
  • [3] Feed-food and land use competition of lowland and mountain dairy cow farms
    Ineichen, S. M.
    Zumwald, J.
    Reidy, B.
    Nemecek, T.
    ANIMAL, 2023, 17 (12)
  • [4] Comparison of arthritis characteristics in lowland Gorilla gorilla and mountain Gorilla beringei
    Rothschild, BM
    Rühli, FJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PRIMATOLOGY, 2005, 66 (03) : 205 - 218
  • [5] On Characteristics of Production and Destruction Processes in Lowland and Mountain Tundras of the Extreme North
    N. I. Andreyashkina
    N. V. Peshkova
    Russian Journal of Ecology, 2003, 34 : 98 - 103
  • [6] On characteristics of production and destruction processes in lowland and mountain tundras of the extreme North
    Andreyashkina, NI
    Peshkova, NV
    RUSSIAN JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 2003, 34 (02) : 98 - 103
  • [7] Habitat Characteristics of Lowland Leopard Frogs in Mountain Canyons of Southeastern Arizona
    Wallace, J. Eric
    Steidl, Robert J.
    Swann, Don E.
    JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2010, 74 (04): : 808 - 815
  • [8] The Modifications of Haemoglobin, Erythropoietin Values and Running Performance While Training at Mountain vs. Hilltop vs. Seaside
    Man, Maria Cristina
    Ganera, Catalin
    Barbulet, Gabriel Dan
    Krzysztofik, Michal
    Panaet, Adelina Elena
    Cucui, Alina Ionela
    Tohanean, Dragos Ioan
    Alexe, Dan Iulian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (18)
  • [9] GRASS SILAGE VS. HAY FOR LACTATING DAIRY COWS
    BROWN, LD
    HILLMAN, D
    HUFFMAN, CF
    LASSITER, CA
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1963, 46 (05) : 407 - &
  • [10] PUR RIM vs. Wood in building products
    Sherman, Lilli Manolis
    Plastics Technology, 2006, 52 (02)