Machine learning for aircraft approach time prediction

被引:0
|
作者
Ye B. [1 ]
Bao X. [2 ]
Liu B. [1 ]
Tian Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] College of Civil Aviation, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing
[2] Jiangsu Branch of East China Air Traffic Control Bureau of CAAC, Nanjing
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Air traffic management; Approach time prediction; Feature importance; Machine learning; Random forest;
D O I
10.7527/S1000-6893.2020.24136
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To improve the prediction accuracy of aircraft landing time, we propose a machine learning method to establish an approach time prediction model. Based on the actual operational situation, the primary reasons for different flying time in approach control are analyzed, including eight major factors with 17 important characteristics. Taking the aircraft flying time in approach airspace as labels, we use the proposed characteristics to build machine learning models with four popular machine learning algorithms: the ridge regression, random forest, support vector machine, and neural network. In the case of Nanjing Approach in China, four machine learning models are trained, validated and tested with practical operational data. The results show that the random forest based model exhibits the best prediction performance with good generalization ability, high accuracy and obvious regression effect. The initial arrival state of aircraft is the most important factor for approach time prediction, while the arrival point and initial altitude are two major characteristics for the prediction results. © 2020, Beihang University Aerospace Knowledge Press. All right reserved.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Chinese civil aviation developed statistical bulletin, (2018)
  • [2] WANG H Y, ZHAO Y F, CUI W G., Optimization of terminal airspace structure based on network complexity, Journal of Civil Aviation University of China, 32, 1, pp. 5-9, (2014)
  • [3] WANG X L, PAN W H, ZHAO M., Vulnerability of air traffic interdependent network, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 39, 12, (2018)
  • [4] ZHANG H H, YANG L, BIE Y H, Et al., Analysis on generalized following behavior and complex phase-transition law of approaching traffic flow in terminal airspace, Acta Aeronautic et Astronautica Sinica, 36, 3, pp. 949-961, (2015)
  • [5] WAN L L, HU M H, TIAN Y, Et al., Optimization model of arrival and departure resource allocation in terminal area, Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, 16, 2, pp. 109-117, (2016)
  • [6] WANG L L, WANG H C., Combined optimization method for large-scale air traffic flow management under emergencies, Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica, 40, 8, (2019)
  • [7] ROY K, LEVY B, TOMLIN C J., Target tracking and estimated time of arrival (ETA) prediction for arrival aircraft, 2006 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, (2006)
  • [8] KONYAK M A, DOUCETT S, GALLO E, Et al., Improving ground-based trajectory prediction through communication of aircraft intent, 2009 AIAA Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, (2009)
  • [9] YEPES J L, HWANG I, ROTEA M., New algorithms for aircraft intent inference and trajectory prediction, Journal of Guidance Control & Dynamics, 30, 2, pp. 370-382, (2007)
  • [10] ZHANG J, LIU J, HU R, Et al., Online four dimensional trajectory prediction method based on aircraft intent updating, Aerospace Science & Technology, 77, pp. 774-787, (2018)