Generalized Energy Storage Control Strategies on User Side in Power Ancillary Service Market

被引：0
|
作者：
Sun W. [1 ]
Xiang W. [1 ]
Pei L. [1 ]
Li H. [2 ]
Xi P. [3 ]
机构：
[1] School of Mechanical Engineering, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai
[2] Department of Electrical Engineering, Shanghai University of Electric Power, Shanghai
[3] Shanghai Key Laboratory of Smart Grid Demand Response, Shanghai Electrical Apparatus Research Institute (Group) Co., Ltd., Shanghai
来源：
Xiang, Wei (xw2013_usst@163.com) | 2020年 / Automation of Electric Power Systems Press卷 / 44期
基金：
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词：
Ancillary service market; Control strategy; Generalized energy storage; Load aggregator;
D O I：
10.7500/AEPS20190522003
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Load aggregators (LAs) can provide high-quality ancillary service for power system and receive benefits by aggregating distributed user-side resources. However, the uncertainty of user-side response will exert negative effects on both ancillary service quality and economic benefits of LAs. To overcome such a problem, the controllable load resources are considered as virtual energy storage (VES), and combined with narrow sense energy storage (NSES). Then an uncertain response model of generalized energy storage (GES) is established. Furthermore, two control strategies of LAs, namely NSES priority response and VES priority response, are proposed, and the characteristics of both strategies are discussed. Finally, a revenue model of LAs participating in the ancillary service market using the two control strategies is presented, which is verified for the effectiveness using the operation data of PJM electricity market of America. Case studies show that the LAs can get considerable economic benefits by configuring relatively small amount of NSES equipment and adopting the control strategy of VES priority response. © 2020 Automation of Electric Power Systems Press.
引用
收藏
页码：68 / 76
页数：8
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Chen Y., Zhang X., Luo G., Et al., Demand response mechanism and approach of electricity spot market in bidding mode without price on user side, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 43, 9, pp. 179-186, (2019)
  • [2] Chathurika P.M., Edward R.S., David B.S., Competitive energy trading framework for demand-side management in neighborhood area networks, IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 5, 9, pp. 4313-4322, (2017)
  • [3] Tang Y., Lu Z., Fu X., Demand response strategies for promoting consumption of distributed power generation with residential active load, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 39, 24, pp. 49-55, (2015)
  • [4] Nan S., Li G., Zhou M., Et al., Real-time demand response of curtailable flexible load in smart residential community, Power System Protection and Control, 47, 10, pp. 42-50, (2019)
  • [5] Zhu L., Liu S., Tang L., Et al., Modeling of charging and discharging uncertainty and research on day-ahead dispatching strategy of electric vehicle agents, Power System Technology, 42, 10, pp. 3305-3317, (2018)
  • [6] Liu G., Tomsovi K., Robust unit commitment considering uncertain demand response, Electric Power Systems Research, 119, 119, pp. 126-137, (2015)
  • [7] Sun L., Gao C., Tan J., Et al., Load aggregation technology and its application, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 41, 6, pp. 159-167, (2017)
  • [8] Li J.L., Xue Y.S., Tian L.T., Et al., Research on optimal configuration strategy of energy storage capacity in grid-connected microgrid, Protection and Control of Modern Power Systems, 2, 2, pp. 389-396, (2017)
  • [9] Xue J., Ye J., Tao Q., Et al., Economic feasibility of user-side battery energy storage based on whole-life-cycle cost model, Power System Technology, 40, 8, pp. 2471-2476, (2016)
  • [10] Yan Z., Wang C., Lian H., Et al., Capacity plan of battery energy storage system in user side considering power outage cost, Automation of Electric Power Systems, 36, 11, pp. 50-54, (2012)
123