Crypto-asset regulatory landscape: a comparative analysis of the crypto-asset regulation in the UK and Germany

被引:2
|
作者
Wronka, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] Deloitte Wirtschaftspruefungsgesell GmbH, Dammtorstr 12, D-20354 Hamburg, Germany
关键词
Blockchain; Distributed ledger technology; Crypto-assets; Regulation; UK; Germany;
D O I
10.1057/s41260-024-00358-z
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research paper is to compare and analyse how crypto-assets are regulated in the UK and Germany. The aim is to understand and highlight the approaches taken by these two countries in terms of regulating crypto-assets and to explore the potential impact that their regulatory frameworks could have on the market for these crypto-assets. The research employs a doctrinal research design to examine the crypto-asset regulatory regimes in the UK and Germany. A comprehensive review of existing literature, official regulatory documents and relevant legal frameworks is conducted to understand the core components of each country's crypto-asset regulations. The findings of this study reveal divergences in the regulatory approaches of the UK and Germany towards crypto-assets. While the UK has embraced a principles-based regulatory framework, fostering innovation and industry growth, Germany has adopted a more prescriptive and cautious approach, focusing on investor protection and market stability. The research identifies that the UK's flexible approach has attracted a flourishing crypto-asset ecosystem, while Germany's conservative stance has offered greater investor confidence. However, certain regulatory gaps and challenges persist in both jurisdictions, such as ambiguities in classification and tax treatment, requiring further attention.
引用
收藏
页码:417 / 426
页数:10
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] A Comparative Analysis of EU Homegrown Crypto-asset Regulatory Frameworks
    Buttigieg, Christopher P.
    Cuyle, Samantha
    EUROPEAN LAW REVIEW, 2020, 45 (05) : 639 - 659
  • [2] If GPU(time) == money: Sustainable crypto-asset market? Analysis of similarity among crypto-asset financial time series
    Zieba, Damian
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2024, 89 : 863 - 912
  • [3] Active tokens and crypto-asset valuation
    Pantelidis, Konstantinos
    FINANCIAL INNOVATION, 2025, 11 (01)
  • [4] Analysis of Student Interest in Crypto-Asset Investment
    Tumangkeng, Egbert Gwino
    Kurniawan, Yohannes
    Heykal, Mohamad
    Proceedings of 2024 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, ICIMTech 2024, 2024, : 156 - 161
  • [5] Crypto-asset services under the draft MiCA Regulation
    Hobza, Martin
    CHALLENGES OF LAW IN BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2021, : 13 - 21
  • [6] An analysis of crypto-asset trade, enforcement, and estate planning
    Aliyu, Sirajo
    Abd Wahab, Norazlina
    Kamis, Nur Syaedah
    BORSA ISTANBUL REVIEW, 2025, 25 (01) : 206 - 226
  • [7] Tail risk measurement in crypto-asset markets
    Ahelegbey, Daniel Felix
    Giudici, Paolo
    Mojtahedi, Fatemeh
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2021, 73
  • [8] AN OVERVIEW OF REGULATORY STRATEGIES ON CRYPTO-ASSET REGULATION - CHALLENGES FOR FINANCIAL REGULATORS IN THE WESTERN BALKANS
    Jovanic, Tatjana
    EU FINANCIAL REGULATION AND MARKETS: BEYOND FRAGMENTATION AND DIFFERENTIATION, 2021, : 130 - 177
  • [9] Crypto-Asset Market Abuse Under EU MiCA
    Barczentewicz, Mikolaj
    Gomes, Andre de Gandara
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RISK REGULATION, 2024,
  • [10] Initial crypto-asset offerings (ICOs), tokenization and corporate governance
    Blemus, Stephane
    Guegan, Dominique
    CAPITAL MARKETS LAW JOURNAL, 2020, 15 (02) : 191 - 223