The driving factors and transmission mechanism of equity premium: Evidence from China’s stock market

被引:0
|
作者
Min F. [1 ]
Wu B. [2 ]
Wen F. [2 ]
机构
[1] School of Finance, Zhejiang University of Finance & Economics, Hangzhou
[2] School of Business, Central South University, Changsha
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
economic fundamentals; equity premium; investor sentiment; monetary policy; transmission mechanism;
D O I
10.12011/STEP2021-2399
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Understanding the main driving factors and transmission mechanism of equity premium is of great importance to improve the forecasting performance of equity premium. This paper studies the dynamic effect of the main driving factors of equity premium on equity premium by using data on China’s stock market. Our findings are as follows: 1) output gap, CPI and investor sentiment shocks have a significant impact on equity premium, while interest rate shocks have a limited impact; 2) State dependent effects of driving factor shocks on equity premium are found. The impact of output gap shocks is greater in the periods of economic recession, while CPI, sentiment and monetary policy shocks have a greater impact in the periods of economic expansion; 3) The explanatory power of these factors to the equity premium mainly comes from the explanatory power to the expected return, and relatively small from the explanatory power to cash flow and discount rate news; 4) Market sentiment shock has the greatest explanatory power to explain the fluctuation of equity premium. Therefore, fully exploring the information about the change of investor sentiment is more likely to improve short-term forecasting performance of equity premium. Our research reveals the dynamic effects and transmission mechanism of economic fundamentals, market sentiment and monetary policy shocks on equity premium, which can provide valuable guidance for the construction of prediction model and investment decision-making. © 2023 Systems Engineering Society of China. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1044 / 1067
页数:23
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Rapach D E, Strauss J K, Zhou G., Out-of-sample equity premium prediction: Combination forecasts and links to the real economy[J], The Review of Financial Studies, 23, 2, pp. 821-862, (2010)
  • [2] Timmermann A., Forecasting methods in finance[J], Annual Review of Financial Economics, 10, pp. 449-479, (2018)
  • [3] Karolyi G A, Van Nieuwerburgh S., New methods for the cross-section of returns[J], The Review of Financial Studies, 33, 5, pp. 1879-1890, (2020)
  • [4] Phillips P C B, Yu J., Dating the timeline of financial bubbles during the subprime crisis[J], Quantitative Economics, 2, 3, pp. 455-491, (2011)
  • [5] Homm U, Breitung J., Testing for speculative bubbles in stock markets: A comparison of alternative methods[J], Journal of Financial Econometrics, 10, 1, pp. 198-231, (2012)
  • [6] Acharya V, Naqvi H., On reaching for yield and the coexistence of bubbles and negative bubbles[J], Journal of Financial Intermediation, 38, pp. 1-10, (2019)
  • [7] Lee J H, Phillips P C B., Asset pricing with financial bubble risk[J], Journal of Empirical Finance, 38, pp. 590-622, (2016)
  • [8] Laopodis N T., Dynamic interactions among the stock market, federal funds rate, inflation, and economic activity[J], Financial Review, 41, 4, pp. 513-545, (2006)
  • [9] Min F, Wen F, Xu J, Et al., Credit supply, house prices, and financial stability[J], International Journal of Finance & Economics, (2021)
  • [10] Sibley S E, Wang Y, Xing Y, Et al., The information content of the sentiment index[J], Journal of Banking & Finance, 62, pp. 164-179, (2016)