A likelihood-free approach towards Bayesian modeling of degradation growths using mixed-effects regression

被引:0
|
作者
Hazra, Indranil [1 ]
Pandey, Mahesh D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo,ON,N2L 3G1, Canada
来源
Computers and Structures | 2021年 / 244卷
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Analytical formulation - Approximate Bayesian - Likelihood functions - Parameter uncertainty - Posterior distributions - Regression parameters - Rejection mechanisms - Structural component;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mixed-effects regression models are widely applicable for predicting degradation growths in structural components. The Bayesian inference method is used to estimate the regression parameters when the degradation data are confounded by measurement and parameter uncertainties. The Gibbs sampler (GS), commonly used for this purpose, works when the regression errors are assumed as normally distributed that allows for the analytical formulation of the likelihood function. In case of a more general regression error distribution (e.g., mixture models), the likelihood becomes analytically intractable and computationally expensive to a degree that any likelihood-based Bayesian inference scheme (e.g., GS, Metropolis-Hastings sampler) can no longer be used for solving a practical problem. This paper proposes a practical likelihood-free approach for parameter estimation based on the approximate Bayesian computation (ABC) method. The ABC method implements forward simulation coupled with a rejection mechanism to sample from a target posterior distribution thereby eliminating the need to evaluate the likelihood function. The advantages of the proposed method are illustrated by analyzing degradation data obtained from a Canadian nuclear power plant. © 2020 Elsevier Ltd
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A likelihood-free approach towards Bayesian modeling of degradation growths using mixed-effects regression
    Hazra, Indranil
    Pandey, Mahesh D.
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 2021, 244
  • [2] A Mixed-Effects Regression Modeling Approach for Evaluating Paddy Soil Productivity
    Zou, Ganghua
    Li, Yong
    Huang, Tieping
    Liu, De Li
    Herridge, David
    Wu, Jinshui
    AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2017, 109 (05) : 2302 - 2311
  • [3] Likelihood-free Hamiltonian Monte Carlo for modeling piping degradation and remaining useful life prediction using the mixed gamma process
    Hazra, Indranil
    Bhadra, Rituraj
    Pandey, Mahesh D.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING, 2022, 200
  • [4] A likelihood-free Bayesian approach for characterisation of multiple delaminations in laminated composite beams
    Zeng, Zijie
    Feng, Yuan
    Ng, Ching Tai
    Sheikh, Abdul Hamid
    STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [5] A Bayesian approach to functional mixed-effects modeling for longitudinal data with binomial outcomes
    Kliethermes, Stephanie
    Oleson, Jacob
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (18) : 3130 - 3146
  • [6] Bayesian quantile semiparametric mixed-effects double regression models
    Zhang, Duo
    Wu, Liucang
    Ye, Keying
    Wang, Min
    STATISTICAL THEORY AND RELATED FIELDS, 2021, 5 (04) : 303 - 315
  • [7] Benefits of Bayesian Model Averaging for Mixed-Effects Modeling
    Heck D.W.
    Bockting F.
    Computational Brain & Behavior, 2023, 6 (1) : 35 - 49
  • [8] Bayesian composite quantile regression for linear mixed-effects models
    Tian, Yuzhu
    Lian, Heng
    Tian, Maozai
    COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 2017, 46 (15) : 7717 - 7731
  • [9] Bayesian analysis for semiparametric mixed-effects double regression models
    Xu, Dengke
    Zhang, Zhongzhan
    Wu, Liucang
    HACETTEPE JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS, 2016, 45 (01): : 279 - 296
  • [10] Estimating anatomical trajectories with Bayesian mixed-effects modeling
    Ziegler, G.
    Penny, W. D.
    Ridgway, G. R.
    Ourselin, S.
    Friston, K. J.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2015, 121 : 51 - 68