Axiomatic effect propagation in structural causal models

被引:0
|
作者
Singal, Raghav [1 ]
Michailidis, George [2 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Tuck Sch Business, Operat & Management Sci, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Stat & Data Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Structural causal model; attribution; effect decomposition; Shapley value; Monte-Carlo estimation; SHAPLEY VALUE; DECOMPOSITION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We study effect propagation in a causal directed acyclic graph (DAG), with the goal of providing a flow-based decomposition of the effect (i.e., change in the outcome variable) as a result of changes in the source variables. We first compare various ideas on causality to quantify effect propagation, such as direct and indirect effects, path-specific effects, and degree of responsibility. We discuss the shortcomings of such approaches and propose a flow-based methodology, which we call recursive Shapley value (RSV). By considering a broader set of counterfactuals than existing methods, RSV obeys a unique adherence to four desirable flow-based axioms. Further, we provide a general path-based characterization of RSV for an arbitrary non-parametric structural equations model (SEM) defined on the underlying DAG. Interestingly, for the special class of linear SEMs, RSV exhibits a simple and tractable characterization (and hence, computation), which recovers the classical method of path coefficients and is equivalent to path-specific effects. For non-parametric SEMs, we use our general characterization to develop an unbiased Monte-Carlo estimation procedure with an exponentially decaying sample complexity. We showcase the application of RSV on two challenging problems on causality (causal overdetermination and causal unfairness).
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 71
页数:71
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Beyond Structural Causal Models: Causal Constraints Models
    Blom, Tineke
    Bongers, Stephan
    Mooij, Joris M.
    35TH UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE CONFERENCE (UAI 2019), 2020, 115 : 585 - 594
  • [2] Evaluating effect, composite, and causal indicators in structural equation models
    Bollen K.A.
    MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 2011, 35 (02): : 359 - 372
  • [3] EVALUATING EFFECT, COMPOSITE, AND CAUSAL INDICATORS IN STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS
    Bollen, Kenneth A.
    MIS QUARTERLY, 2011, 35 (02) : 359 - 372
  • [4] An axiomatic characterization of causal counterfactuals
    Galles D.
    Pearl J.
    Foundations of Science, 1998, 3 (1) : 151 - 182
  • [5] Axiomatic Causal Interventions for Reverse Engineering Relevance Computation in Neural Retrieval Models
    Chen, Catherine
    Merullo, Jack
    Eickhoff, Carsten
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 47TH INTERNATIONAL ACM SIGIR CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL, SIGIR 2024, 2024, : 1401 - 1410
  • [6] Marginal structural models to estimate the joint causal effect of nonrandomized treatments
    Hernán, MA
    Brumback, B
    Robins, JM
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 96 (454) : 440 - 448
  • [7] Distinguishing Cause and Effect in Bivariate Structural Causal Models: A Systematic Investigation
    Kaeding, Christoph
    Runge, Jakob
    JOURNAL OF MACHINE LEARNING RESEARCH, 2023, 24
  • [8] Distinguishing Cause and Effect in Bivariate Structural Causal Models: A Systematic Investigation
    Käding, Christoph
    Runge, Jakob
    Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2023, 24
  • [9] Causal Consistency of Structural Equation Models
    Rubenstein, Paul K.
    Weichwald, Sebastian
    Bongers, Stephan
    Mooij, Joris M.
    Janzing, Dominik
    Grosse-Wentrup, Moritz
    Scholkopf, Bernhard
    CONFERENCE ON UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (UAI2017), 2017,
  • [10] Causal Discovery in Linear Structural Causal Models with Deterministic Relations
    Yang, Yuqin
    Nafea, Mohamed
    Ghassami, AmirEmad
    Kiyavash, Negar
    CONFERENCE ON CAUSAL LEARNING AND REASONING, VOL 177, 2022, 177