Comparison of the efficacy and safety of ciprofol and propofol in sedating patients in the operating room and outside the operating room: a meta-analysis and systematic review

被引:4
|
作者
Yang, Yanni [1 ,2 ]
Lang, Zekun [2 ]
Wang, Xiumei [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Peining [1 ,2 ]
Meng, Ning [1 ,2 ]
Xing, Yang [2 ]
Liu, Yatao [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] First Hosp Lanzhou Univ, Dept Anesthesiol & Operating Theater, 1 Donggang West Rd, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
[2] Lanzhou Univ, Clin Med Coll 1, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu, Peoples R China
来源
BMC ANESTHESIOLOGY | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
Ciprofol; Propofol; Anesthesia; Sedation; GENERAL-ANESTHESIA; PARALLEL-GROUP; INDUCTION; MAINTENANCE; MULTICENTER; PHASE-3; BLIND;
D O I
10.1186/s12871-024-02609-3
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
BackgroundAs a new type of intravenous anesthetic, ciprofol has the advantages of fast onset of action, fast recovery and high clearance rate. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of ciprofol versus traditional propofol for anesthesia and sedation in and out of the operating room.MethodsWe searched the literature in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases from January 2021 to December 2023. All clinical studies comparing the sedative effects of propofol and ciprofol, both inside and outside the operating room, were included in our trial. The main outcome measures were induction time and incidence of injection-site pain. Data are merged using risk ratio and standardized mean difference with 95% confidence interval. Subgroup analysis, meta-regression, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias were performed. The study protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023447747).ResultsA total of 15 randomized, controlled trials involving 2002 patients were included in this study. Compared with propofol, ciprofol has a longer induction time in the operating room but a shorter induction time in non-operating room settings. Ciprofol can effectively reduce the risk of injection-site pain and respiratory depression both inside and outside the operating room. In addition, the risk of drug-related hypotension induced with ciprofol in the operating room is lower, but the awakening time is also longer. Meta-regression analysis showed that neither age nor BMI were potential sources of heterogeneity. Funnel plot, egger and begg tests showed no significant publication bias. Sensitivity analyzes indicate that our results are robust and reliable.ConclusionCiprofol has absolute advantages in reducing the risk of injection-site pain and respiratory depression, both in and outside operating room. Intraoperative use of ciprofol reduces the risk of drug-related hypotension and may also reduce the risk of intraoperative physical movements. However, ciprofol may have longer induction and awakening time than propofol.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intravenous esketamine as an adjuvant for sedation/analgesia outside the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kan, Ziheng
    Min, Weixiang
    Dai, Yuee
    Zhang, Peng
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 15
  • [2] Safety and efficacy of sugammadex use outside of the operating room
    Gartner, Hayley
    Rech, Megan
    CLINICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2023, 61 : 74 - 74
  • [3] Comparison of invasive and noninvasive blood hemoglobin measurement in the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hosein Shabaninejad
    Nashmil Ghadimi
    Kourosh Sayehmiri
    Hossein Hosseinifard
    Rasoul Azarfarin
    Hasan Abolghasem Gorji
    Journal of Anesthesia, 2019, 33 : 441 - 453
  • [4] The impact of operating room noise levels on stress and work efficiency of the operating room team A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis
    Peng, Li
    Chen, Jia
    Jiang, Hong
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (03) : E28572
  • [5] Comparison of invasive and noninvasive blood hemoglobin measurement in the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shabaninejad, Hosein
    Ghadimi, Nashmil
    Sayehmiri, Kourosh
    Hosseinifard, Hossein
    Azarfarin, Rasoul
    Gorji, Hasan Abolghasem
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA, 2019, 33 (03) : 441 - 453
  • [6] Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for emergency orotracheal intubation outside the operating room: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Arulkumaran, N.
    Lowe, J.
    Ions, R.
    Mendoza, M.
    Bennett, V.
    Dunser, M. W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 120 (04) : 712 - 724
  • [7] Are operating room distractions, interruptions and disruptions associated with performance and patient safety? A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mcmullan, Ryan D.
    Urwin, Rachel
    Gates, Peter
    Sunderland, Neroli
    Westbrook, Johanna, I
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2021, 33 (02)
  • [8] Efficacy and safety of Ciprofol for procedural sedation and anesthesia in non-operating room settings
    Zhong, Jing
    Zhang, Jinlin
    Fan, Yu
    Zhu, Min
    Zhao, Xining
    Zuo, Zhiyi
    Zhou, Xiushi
    Miao, Changhong
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2023, 85
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hudaib, Muhammad
    Malik, Hurais
    Zakir, Syeda Javeria
    Rabbani, Samra
    Gnanendran, Dhanushan
    Syed, Abdul Rehman Shah
    Suri, Noor Fatima
    Khan, Javeria
    Iqbal, Arham
    Hussain, Nowal
    Abdullah, Muhammad
    Kumar, Satesh
    Khatri, Mahima
    Varrassi, Giustino
    JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA ANALGESIA AND CRITICAL CARE, 2024, 4 (01):
  • [10] The use of video laryngoscopy outside the operating room: A systematic review
    Perkins, Emma J.
    Begley, Jonathan L.
    Brewster, Fiona M.
    Hanegbi, Nathan D.
    Ilancheran, Arun A.
    Brewster, David J.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (10):